let P be Subset of (TOP-REAL 2); :: thesis: for p1, p2, q1, q2 being Point of (TOP-REAL 2)
for g being Function of I[01] ,((TOP-REAL 2) | P)
for s1, s2 being Real st P is_an_arc_of p1,p2 & g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = p1 & g . 1 = p2 & g . s1 = q1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = q2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 & s1 <= s2 holds
LE q1,q2,P,p1,p2

let p1, p2, q1, q2 be Point of (TOP-REAL 2); :: thesis: for g being Function of I[01] ,((TOP-REAL 2) | P)
for s1, s2 being Real st P is_an_arc_of p1,p2 & g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = p1 & g . 1 = p2 & g . s1 = q1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = q2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 & s1 <= s2 holds
LE q1,q2,P,p1,p2

let g be Function of I[01] ,((TOP-REAL 2) | P); :: thesis: for s1, s2 being Real st P is_an_arc_of p1,p2 & g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = p1 & g . 1 = p2 & g . s1 = q1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = q2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 & s1 <= s2 holds
LE q1,q2,P,p1,p2

let s1, s2 be Real; :: thesis: ( P is_an_arc_of p1,p2 & g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = p1 & g . 1 = p2 & g . s1 = q1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = q2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 & s1 <= s2 implies LE q1,q2,P,p1,p2 )
assume A1: ( P is_an_arc_of p1,p2 & g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = p1 & g . 1 = p2 & g . s1 = q1 & 0 <= s1 & s1 <= 1 & g . s2 = q2 & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 & s1 <= s2 ) ; :: thesis: LE q1,q2,P,p1,p2
then reconsider P' = P as non empty Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) by TOPREAL1:4;
reconsider g = g as Function of I[01] ,((TOP-REAL 2) | P') ;
A2: s1 in the carrier of I[01] by A1, BORSUK_1:86;
then A3: q1 in [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | P') by A1, FUNCT_2:7;
A4: s2 in the carrier of I[01] by A1, BORSUK_1:86;
then g . s2 in the carrier of ((TOP-REAL 2) | P') by FUNCT_2:7;
then A5: ( q1 in P & q2 in P ) by A1, A3, PRE_TOPC:def 10;
now
let h be Function of I[01] ,((TOP-REAL 2) | P'); :: thesis: for t1, t2 being Real st h is being_homeomorphism & h . 0 = p1 & h . 1 = p2 & h . t1 = q1 & 0 <= t1 & t1 <= 1 & h . t2 = q2 & 0 <= t2 & t2 <= 1 holds
b4 <= b5

let t1, t2 be Real; :: thesis: ( h is being_homeomorphism & h . 0 = p1 & h . 1 = p2 & h . t1 = q1 & 0 <= t1 & t1 <= 1 & h . t2 = q2 & 0 <= t2 & t2 <= 1 implies b2 <= b3 )
assume A6: ( h is being_homeomorphism & h . 0 = p1 & h . 1 = p2 & h . t1 = q1 & 0 <= t1 & t1 <= 1 & h . t2 = q2 & 0 <= t2 & t2 <= 1 ) ; :: thesis: b2 <= b3
set hg = (h " ) * g;
h " is being_homeomorphism by A6, TOPS_2:70;
then A7: (h " ) * g is being_homeomorphism by A1, TOPS_2:71;
A8: ( dom h = [#] I[01] & rng h = [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | P) ) by A6, TOPS_2:def 5;
then A9: ( 0 in dom h & 1 in dom h ) by BORSUK_1:86;
A10: h is one-to-one by A6, TOPS_2:def 5;
A11: ( (h " ) * g is continuous & (h " ) * g is one-to-one ) by A7, TOPS_2:def 5;
A12: (h " ) . p1 = (h " ) . p1 by A8, A10, TOPS_2:def 4
.= 0 by A6, A9, A10, FUNCT_1:54 ;
A13: (h " ) . p2 = (h " ) . p2 by A8, A10, TOPS_2:def 4
.= 1 by A6, A9, A10, FUNCT_1:54 ;
A14: ( dom g = [#] I[01] & rng g = [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | P) ) by A1, TOPS_2:def 5;
then 0 in dom g by BORSUK_1:86;
then A15: ((h " ) * g) . 0 = 0 by A1, A12, FUNCT_1:23;
1 in dom g by A14, BORSUK_1:86;
then A16: ((h " ) * g) . 1 = 1 by A1, A13, FUNCT_1:23;
A17: t1 in dom h by A6, A8, BORSUK_1:86;
s1 in dom g by A1, A14, BORSUK_1:86;
then A18: ((h " ) * g) . s1 = (h " ) . q1 by A1, FUNCT_1:23
.= (h " ) . q1 by A8, A10, TOPS_2:def 4
.= t1 by A6, A10, A17, FUNCT_1:54 ;
A19: t2 in dom h by A6, A8, BORSUK_1:86;
s2 in dom g by A1, A14, BORSUK_1:86;
then A20: ((h " ) * g) . s2 = (h " ) . q2 by A1, FUNCT_1:23
.= (h " ) . q2 by A8, A10, TOPS_2:def 4
.= t2 by A6, A10, A19, FUNCT_1:54 ;
reconsider s1' = s1, s2' = s2 as Point of I[01] by A1, BORSUK_1:86;
( ((h " ) * g) . s1 in the carrier of I[01] & ((h " ) * g) . s2 in the carrier of I[01] ) by A2, A4, FUNCT_2:7;
then reconsider hg1 = ((h " ) * g) . s1', hg2 = ((h " ) * g) . s2' as Real by BORSUK_1:83;
per cases ( s1 < s2 or s1 = s2 ) by A1, XXREAL_0:1;
suppose s1 = s2 ; :: thesis: b2 <= b3
hence t1 <= t2 by A18, A20; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence LE q1,q2,P,p1,p2 by A5, Def3; :: thesis: verum