let C be compact Subset of (TOP-REAL 2); :: thesis: ( BDD C <> {} implies E-bound C >= E-bound (BDD C) )
set WC = E-bound (BDD C);
set WB = E-bound C;
set hal = ((E-bound C) + (E-bound (BDD C))) / 2;
assume that
A1:
BDD C <> {}
and
A2:
E-bound (BDD C) > E-bound C
; :: thesis: contradiction
A3:
( ((E-bound C) + (E-bound (BDD C))) / 2 > E-bound C & ((E-bound C) + (E-bound (BDD C))) / 2 < E-bound (BDD C) )
by A2, XREAL_1:228;
now per cases
( for q1 being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) st q1 in BDD C holds
q1 `1 <= ((E-bound C) + (E-bound (BDD C))) / 2 or ex q1 being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) st
( q1 in BDD C & q1 `1 > ((E-bound C) + (E-bound (BDD C))) / 2 ) )
;
suppose
ex
q1 being
Point of
(TOP-REAL 2) st
(
q1 in BDD C &
q1 `1 > ((E-bound C) + (E-bound (BDD C))) / 2 )
;
:: thesis: contradictionthen consider q1 being
Point of
(TOP-REAL 2) such that A4:
(
q1 in BDD C &
q1 `1 > ((E-bound C) + (E-bound (BDD C))) / 2 )
;
A5:
q1 `1 > E-bound C
by A3, A4, XXREAL_0:2;
set Q =
|[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]|;
set WH =
east_halfline |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]|;
A6:
|[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]| `1 = ((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2
by EUCLID:56;
then
(
q1 `2 = |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]| `2 &
q1 `1 > |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]| `1 )
by A5, EUCLID:56, XREAL_1:228;
then A7:
q1 in east_halfline |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]|
by TOPREAL1:def 13;
east_halfline |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]| misses C
proof
assume
(east_halfline |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]|) /\ C <> {}
;
:: according to XBOOLE_0:def 7 :: thesis: contradiction
then consider y being
set such that A8:
y in (east_halfline |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]|) /\ C
by XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A9:
(
y in east_halfline |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]| &
y in C )
by A8, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
reconsider y =
y as
Point of
(TOP-REAL 2) by A8;
A10:
(
y `1 >= |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]| `1 &
y `2 = |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]| `2 )
by A9, TOPREAL1:def 13;
|[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]| `1 > E-bound C
by A5, A6, XREAL_1:228;
then
y `1 > E-bound C
by A10, XXREAL_0:2;
hence
contradiction
by A9, PSCOMP_1:71;
:: thesis: verum
end; then
east_halfline |[(((E-bound C) + (q1 `1 )) / 2),(q1 `2 )]| c= UBD C
by JORDAN2C:135;
then
q1 in (BDD C) /\ (UBD C)
by A4, A7, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
BDD C meets UBD C
by XBOOLE_0:4;
hence
contradiction
by JORDAN2C:28;
:: thesis: verum end; end; end;
hence
contradiction
; :: thesis: verum