let p1, p2 be Point of (TOP-REAL 2); :: thesis: for P being non empty compact Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) st P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.p.| = 1 } & LE p1,p2,P & p1 <> p2 & p1 `2 <= 0 & p2 `2 <= 0 & p1 <> W-min P holds
p1 `1 > p2 `1

let P be non empty compact Subset of (TOP-REAL 2); :: thesis: ( P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.p.| = 1 } & LE p1,p2,P & p1 <> p2 & p1 `2 <= 0 & p2 `2 <= 0 & p1 <> W-min P implies p1 `1 > p2 `1 )
assume A1: ( P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.p.| = 1 } & LE p1,p2,P & p1 <> p2 & p1 `2 <= 0 & p2 `2 <= 0 & p1 <> W-min P ) ; :: thesis: p1 `1 > p2 `1
then A2: P is being_simple_closed_curve by JGRAPH_3:36;
then A3: ( P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.p.| = 1 } & p1 in P & p2 in P & LE p1,p2,P & p1 <> p2 & p1 `2 <= 0 & p2 `2 <= 0 & p1 <> W-min P ) by A1, JORDAN7:5;
set P4 = Lower_Arc P;
A4: ( Lower_Arc P is_an_arc_of E-max P, W-min P & (Upper_Arc P) /\ (Lower_Arc P) = {(W-min P),(E-max P)} & (Upper_Arc P) \/ (Lower_Arc P) = P & (First_Point (Upper_Arc P),(W-min P),(E-max P),(Vertical_Line (((W-bound P) + (E-bound P)) / 2))) `2 > (Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line (((W-bound P) + (E-bound P)) / 2))) `2 ) by A2, JORDAN6:def 9;
A5: Lower_Arc P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) } by A1, Th38;
now
assume A6: p1 in Upper_Arc P ; :: thesis: p1 `1 > p2 `1
p1 in Lower_Arc P by A3, A5;
then p1 in {(W-min P),(E-max P)} by A4, A6, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then A7: ( p1 = W-min P or p1 = E-max P ) by TARSKI:def 2;
consider p9 being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A8: ( p9 = p2 & |.p9.| = 1 ) by A3;
A9: p1 = |[1,0 ]| by A1, A7, Th33;
then A10: p1 `1 = 1 by EUCLID:56;
A11: now
assume A12: p2 `1 = 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
1 ^2 = ((p2 `1 ) ^2 ) + ((p2 `2 ) ^2 ) by A8, JGRAPH_3:10;
then p2 `2 = 0 by A12, XCMPLX_1:6;
hence contradiction by A1, A9, A12, EUCLID:57; :: thesis: verum
end;
p2 `1 <= 1 by A8, Th3;
hence p1 `1 > p2 `1 by A10, A11, XXREAL_0:1; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A13: ( ( p1 in Lower_Arc P & p2 in Lower_Arc P & not p2 = W-min P & LE p1,p2, Lower_Arc P, E-max P, W-min P ) or p1 `1 > p2 `1 ) by A1, JORDAN6:def 10;
consider f being Function of I[01] ,((TOP-REAL 2) | (Lower_Arc P)) such that
A14: ( f is being_homeomorphism & ( for q1, q2 being Point of (TOP-REAL 2)
for r1, r2 being Real st f . r1 = q1 & f . r2 = q2 & r1 in [.0 ,1.] & r2 in [.0 ,1.] holds
( r1 < r2 iff q1 `1 > q2 `1 ) ) & f . 0 = E-max P & f . 1 = W-min P ) by A1, Th45;
A15: rng f = [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | (Lower_Arc P)) by A14, TOPS_2:def 5
.= Lower_Arc P by PRE_TOPC:def 10 ;
now
per cases ( not p1 `1 > p2 `1 or p1 `1 > p2 `1 ) ;
case A16: not p1 `1 > p2 `1 ; :: thesis: p1 `1 > p2 `1
then consider x1 being set such that
A17: ( x1 in dom f & p1 = f . x1 ) by A13, A15, FUNCT_1:def 5;
consider x2 being set such that
A18: ( x2 in dom f & p2 = f . x2 ) by A13, A15, A16, FUNCT_1:def 5;
A19: dom f = [#] I[01] by A14, TOPS_2:def 5
.= [.0 ,1.] by BORSUK_1:83 ;
then reconsider r11 = x1 as Real by A17;
reconsider r22 = x2 as Real by A18, A19;
A20: ( 0 <= r11 & r11 <= 1 ) by A17, A19, XXREAL_1:1;
A21: ( 0 <= r22 & r22 <= 1 ) by A18, A19, XXREAL_1:1;
A22: ( r11 < r22 iff p1 `1 > p2 `1 ) by A14, A17, A18, A19;
( r11 <= r22 or p1 `1 > p2 `1 ) by A13, A14, A17, A18, A20, A21, JORDAN5C:def 3;
hence p1 `1 > p2 `1 by A1, A17, A18, A22, XXREAL_0:1; :: thesis: verum
end;
case p1 `1 > p2 `1 ; :: thesis: p1 `1 > p2 `1
hence p1 `1 > p2 `1 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence p1 `1 > p2 `1 ; :: thesis: verum