let P be non empty compact Subset of (TOP-REAL 2); :: thesis: ( P = { q where q is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.q.| = 1 } implies Lower_Arc P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) } )
assume A1: P = { q where q is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.q.| = 1 } ; :: thesis: Lower_Arc P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) }
then A2: P is being_simple_closed_curve by JGRAPH_3:36;
then A3: Upper_Arc P is_an_arc_of W-min P, E-max P by JORDAN6:def 8;
A4: Lower_Arc P is_an_arc_of E-max P, W-min P by A2, JORDAN6:def 9;
set P4 = Lower_Arc P;
A5: ( Lower_Arc P is_an_arc_of E-max P, W-min P & (Upper_Arc P) /\ (Lower_Arc P) = {(W-min P),(E-max P)} & (Upper_Arc P) \/ (Lower_Arc P) = P & (First_Point (Upper_Arc P),(W-min P),(E-max P),(Vertical_Line (((W-bound P) + (E-bound P)) / 2))) `2 > (Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line (((W-bound P) + (E-bound P)) / 2))) `2 ) by A2, JORDAN6:def 9;
A6: W-bound P = - 1 by A1, Th31;
A7: E-bound P = 1 by A1, Th31;
reconsider P1 = Lower_Arc P as Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) ;
reconsider P2 = Upper_Arc P as Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) ;
reconsider Q = Vertical_Line 0 as Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) ;
set p11 = W-min P;
set p22 = E-max P;
set pj = First_Point (Upper_Arc P),(W-min P),(E-max P),(Vertical_Line 0 );
set p8 = Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line 0 );
A8: W-bound P = - 1 by A1, Th31;
A9: E-bound P = 1 by A1, Th31;
A10: S-bound P = - 1 by A1, Th31;
A11: N-bound P = 1 by A1, Th31;
A12: LSeg |[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]| c= Q
proof
let x be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in LSeg |[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]| or x in Q )
assume x in LSeg |[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]| ; :: thesis: x in Q
then x in { (((1 - l) * |[0 ,(- 1)]|) + (l * |[0 ,1]|)) where l is Real : ( 0 <= l & l <= 1 ) } ;
then consider l being Real such that
A13: ( x = ((1 - l) * |[0 ,(- 1)]|) + (l * |[0 ,1]|) & 0 <= l & l <= 1 ) ;
(((1 - l) * |[0 ,(- 1)]|) + (l * |[0 ,1]|)) `1 = (((1 - l) * |[0 ,(- 1)]|) `1 ) + ((l * |[0 ,1]|) `1 ) by TOPREAL3:7
.= ((1 - l) * (|[0 ,(- 1)]| `1 )) + ((l * |[0 ,1]|) `1 ) by TOPREAL3:9
.= ((1 - l) * (|[0 ,(- 1)]| `1 )) + (l * (|[0 ,1]| `1 )) by TOPREAL3:9
.= ((1 - l) * 0 ) + (l * (|[0 ,1]| `1 )) by EUCLID:56
.= ((1 - l) * 0 ) + (l * 0 ) by EUCLID:56
.= 0 ;
hence x in Q by A13; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A14: P1 meets Q by A2, A8, A9, A10, A11, JORDAN6:85, XBOOLE_1:64;
A15: Lower_Arc P is closed by A4, JORDAN6:12;
Vertical_Line 0 is closed by JORDAN6:33;
then P1 /\ Q is closed by A15, TOPS_1:35;
then A16: ( Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line 0 ) in P1 /\ Q & ( for g being Function of I[01] ,((TOP-REAL 2) | P1)
for s2 being Real st g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = E-max P & g . 1 = W-min P & g . s2 = Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line 0 ) & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 holds
for t being Real st 1 >= t & t > s2 holds
not g . t in Q ) ) by A4, A14, JORDAN5C:def 2;
P1 /\ Q c= {|[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]|}
proof
let x be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in P1 /\ Q or x in {|[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]|} )
assume x in P1 /\ Q ; :: thesis: x in {|[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]|}
then A17: ( x in P1 & x in Q ) by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then consider p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A18: ( p = x & p `1 = 0 ) ;
x in P by A5, A17, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then consider q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A19: ( q = x & |.q.| = 1 ) by A1;
(0 ^2 ) + ((q `2 ) ^2 ) = 1 ^2 by A18, A19, JGRAPH_3:10;
then ( q `2 = 1 or q `2 = - 1 ) by SQUARE_1:110;
then ( x = |[0 ,(- 1)]| or x = |[0 ,1]| ) by A18, A19, EUCLID:57;
hence x in {|[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]|} by TARSKI:def 2; :: thesis: verum
end;
then ( Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line 0 ) = |[0 ,(- 1)]| or Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line 0 ) = |[0 ,1]| ) by A16, TARSKI:def 2;
then A20: ( (Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line 0 )) `2 = - 1 or (Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line 0 )) `2 = 1 ) by EUCLID:56;
A21: P2 meets Q by A2, A8, A9, A10, A11, A12, JORDAN6:84, XBOOLE_1:64;
A22: Upper_Arc P is closed by A3, JORDAN6:12;
Vertical_Line 0 is closed by JORDAN6:33;
then P2 /\ Q is closed by A22, TOPS_1:35;
then A23: ( First_Point (Upper_Arc P),(W-min P),(E-max P),(Vertical_Line 0 ) in P2 /\ Q & ( for g being Function of I[01] ,((TOP-REAL 2) | P2)
for s2 being Real st g is being_homeomorphism & g . 0 = W-min P & g . 1 = E-max P & g . s2 = First_Point (Upper_Arc P),(W-min P),(E-max P),(Vertical_Line 0 ) & 0 <= s2 & s2 <= 1 holds
for t being Real st 0 <= t & t < s2 holds
not g . t in Q ) ) by A3, A21, JORDAN5C:def 1;
P2 /\ Q c= {|[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]|}
proof
let x be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in P2 /\ Q or x in {|[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]|} )
assume x in P2 /\ Q ; :: thesis: x in {|[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]|}
then A24: ( x in P2 & x in Q ) by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then consider p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A25: ( p = x & p `1 = 0 ) ;
x in P by A5, A24, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then consider q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A26: ( q = x & |.q.| = 1 ) by A1;
(0 ^2 ) + ((q `2 ) ^2 ) = 1 ^2 by A25, A26, JGRAPH_3:10;
then ( q `2 = 1 or q `2 = - 1 ) by SQUARE_1:110;
then ( x = |[0 ,(- 1)]| or x = |[0 ,1]| ) by A25, A26, EUCLID:57;
hence x in {|[0 ,(- 1)]|,|[0 ,1]|} by TARSKI:def 2; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A27: ( First_Point (Upper_Arc P),(W-min P),(E-max P),(Vertical_Line 0 ) = |[0 ,(- 1)]| or First_Point (Upper_Arc P),(W-min P),(E-max P),(Vertical_Line 0 ) = |[0 ,1]| ) by A23, TARSKI:def 2;
A28: Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line 0 ) in P1 by A16, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A29: Lower_Arc P c= P by A5, XBOOLE_1:7;
A30: Upper_Arc P c= P by A5, XBOOLE_1:7;
E-max P in {(W-min P),(E-max P)} by TARSKI:def 2;
then A31: E-max P in Lower_Arc P by A5, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
W-min P in {(W-min P),(E-max P)} by TARSKI:def 2;
then A32: W-min P in Lower_Arc P by A5, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
reconsider R = Lower_Arc P as non empty Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) ;
consider f being Function of I[01] ,((TOP-REAL 2) | R) such that
A33: ( f is being_homeomorphism & f . 0 = E-max P & f . 1 = W-min P ) by A4, TOPREAL1:def 2;
rng f = [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | R) by A33, TOPS_2:def 5
.= R by PRE_TOPC:def 10 ;
then consider x8 being set such that
A34: ( x8 in dom f & Last_Point (Lower_Arc P),(E-max P),(W-min P),(Vertical_Line 0 ) = f . x8 ) by A28, FUNCT_1:def 5;
dom f = [.0 ,1.] by BORSUK_1:83, FUNCT_2:def 1;
then x8 in { r where r is Real : ( 0 <= r & r <= 1 ) } by A34, RCOMP_1:def 1;
then consider r8 being Real such that
A35: ( x8 = r8 & 0 <= r8 & r8 <= 1 ) ;
A36: now end;
now end;
then A37: 1 > r8 by A35, XXREAL_0:1;
reconsider h2 = proj2 as Function of (TOP-REAL 2),R^1 by TOPMETR:24;
A38: f is continuous by A33, TOPS_2:def 5;
A39: f is one-to-one by A33, TOPS_2:def 5;
for p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) holds h2 . p = proj2 . p ;
then A40: h2 is continuous by Th35;
A41: dom f = the carrier of I[01] by FUNCT_2:def 1;
A42: the carrier of ((TOP-REAL 2) | R) = R by PRE_TOPC:29;
then A43: rng f c= the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) by XBOOLE_1:1;
dom h2 = the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) by FUNCT_2:def 1;
then A44: dom (h2 * f) = the carrier of I[01] by A41, A43, RELAT_1:46;
rng (h2 * f) c= the carrier of R^1 ;
then reconsider g0 = h2 * f as Function of I[01] ,R^1 by A44, FUNCT_2:4;
A45: ( ex p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) ex t being Real st
( 0 < t & t < 1 & f . t = p & p `2 < 0 ) implies for q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) st q in Lower_Arc P holds
q `2 <= 0 )
proof
assume ex p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) ex t being Real st
( 0 < t & t < 1 & f . t = p & p `2 < 0 ) ; :: thesis: for q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) st q in Lower_Arc P holds
q `2 <= 0

then consider p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2), t being Real such that
A46: ( 0 < t & t < 1 & f . t = p & p `2 < 0 ) ;
now
assume ex q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) st
( q in Lower_Arc P & q `2 > 0 ) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then consider q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A47: ( q in Lower_Arc P & q `2 > 0 ) ;
rng f = [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | R) by A33, TOPS_2:def 5
.= R by PRE_TOPC:def 10 ;
then consider x being set such that
A48: ( x in dom f & q = f . x ) by A47, FUNCT_1:def 5;
A49: dom f = [.0 ,1.] by BORSUK_1:83, FUNCT_2:def 1;
then x in { r where r is Real : ( 0 <= r & r <= 1 ) } by A48, RCOMP_1:def 1;
then consider r being Real such that
A50: ( x = r & 0 <= r & r <= 1 ) ;
A51: (h2 * f) . r = h2 . q by A48, A50, FUNCT_1:23
.= q `2 by PSCOMP_1:def 29 ;
t in { v where v is Real : ( 0 <= v & v <= 1 ) } by A46;
then A52: t in [.0 ,1.] by RCOMP_1:def 1;
then A53: (h2 * f) . t = h2 . p by A46, A49, FUNCT_1:23
.= p `2 by PSCOMP_1:def 29 ;
now
per cases ( r < t or t < r or t = r ) by XXREAL_0:1;
case A54: r < t ; :: thesis: contradiction
then reconsider B = [.r,t.] as non empty Subset of I[01] by A48, A50, A52, BORSUK_1:83, XXREAL_1:1, XXREAL_2:def 12;
reconsider B0 = B as Subset of I[01] ;
reconsider g = g0 | B0 as Function of (I[01] | B0),R^1 by PRE_TOPC:30;
g0 is continuous by A38, A40, Th10;
then A55: g is continuous by TOPMETR:10;
A56: Closed-Interval-TSpace r,t = I[01] | B by A46, A50, A54, TOPMETR:27, TOPMETR:30;
r in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( r <= r4 & r4 <= t ) } by A54;
then A57: r in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
t in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( r <= r4 & r4 <= t ) } by A54;
then t in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
then ( (q `2 ) * (p `2 ) < 0 & q `2 = g . r & p `2 = g . t ) by A46, A47, A51, A53, A57, FUNCT_1:72, XREAL_1:134;
then consider r1 being Real such that
A58: ( g . r1 = 0 & r < r1 & r1 < t ) by A54, A55, A56, TOPREAL5:14;
r1 in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( r <= r4 & r4 <= t ) } by A58;
then A59: r1 in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
r1 < 1 by A46, A58, XXREAL_0:2;
then r1 in { r2 where r2 is Real : ( 0 <= r2 & r2 <= 1 ) } by A50, A58;
then A60: r1 in dom f by A49, RCOMP_1:def 1;
then f . r1 in rng f by FUNCT_1:def 5;
then f . r1 in R by A42;
then f . r1 in P by A29;
then consider q3 being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A61: ( q3 = f . r1 & |.q3.| = 1 ) by A1;
A62: q3 `2 = h2 . (f . r1) by A61, PSCOMP_1:def 29
.= (h2 * f) . r1 by A60, FUNCT_1:23
.= 0 by A58, A59, FUNCT_1:72 ;
then A63: 1 ^2 = ((q3 `1 ) ^2 ) + (0 ^2 ) by A61, JGRAPH_3:10
.= (q3 `1 ) ^2 ;
now
per cases ( q3 `1 = 1 or q3 `1 = - 1 ) by A63, SQUARE_1:110;
case q3 `1 = 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A64: q3 = |[1,0 ]| by A62, EUCLID:57
.= E-max P by A1, Th33 ;
0 in dom f by A49, XXREAL_1:1;
hence contradiction by A33, A39, A50, A58, A60, A61, A64, FUNCT_1:def 8; :: thesis: verum
end;
case q3 `1 = - 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A65: q3 = |[(- 1),0 ]| by A62, EUCLID:57
.= W-min P by A1, Th32 ;
1 in dom f by A49, XXREAL_1:1;
hence contradiction by A33, A39, A46, A58, A60, A61, A65, FUNCT_1:def 8; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
case A66: t < r ; :: thesis: contradiction
then reconsider B = [.t,r.] as non empty Subset of I[01] by A48, A50, A52, BORSUK_1:83, XXREAL_1:1, XXREAL_2:def 12;
reconsider B0 = B as Subset of I[01] ;
reconsider g = g0 | B0 as Function of (I[01] | B0),R^1 by PRE_TOPC:30;
g0 is continuous by A38, A40, Th10;
then A67: g is continuous by TOPMETR:10;
A68: Closed-Interval-TSpace t,r = I[01] | B by A46, A50, A66, TOPMETR:27, TOPMETR:30;
r in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( t <= r4 & r4 <= r ) } by A66;
then A69: r in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
t in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( t <= r4 & r4 <= r ) } by A66;
then t in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
then ( (q `2 ) * (p `2 ) < 0 & q `2 = g . r & p `2 = g . t ) by A46, A47, A51, A53, A69, FUNCT_1:72, XREAL_1:134;
then consider r1 being Real such that
A70: ( g . r1 = 0 & t < r1 & r1 < r ) by A66, A67, A68, TOPREAL5:14;
r1 in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( t <= r4 & r4 <= r ) } by A70;
then A71: r1 in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
r1 < 1 by A50, A70, XXREAL_0:2;
then r1 in { r2 where r2 is Real : ( 0 <= r2 & r2 <= 1 ) } by A46, A70;
then A72: r1 in dom f by A49, RCOMP_1:def 1;
then f . r1 in rng f by FUNCT_1:def 5;
then f . r1 in R by A42;
then f . r1 in P by A29;
then consider q3 being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A73: ( q3 = f . r1 & |.q3.| = 1 ) by A1;
A74: q3 `2 = h2 . (f . r1) by A73, PSCOMP_1:def 29
.= (h2 * f) . r1 by A72, FUNCT_1:23
.= 0 by A70, A71, FUNCT_1:72 ;
then A75: 1 ^2 = ((q3 `1 ) ^2 ) + (0 ^2 ) by A73, JGRAPH_3:10
.= (q3 `1 ) ^2 ;
now
per cases ( q3 `1 = 1 or q3 `1 = - 1 ) by A75, SQUARE_1:110;
case q3 `1 = 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A76: q3 = |[1,0 ]| by A74, EUCLID:57
.= E-max P by A1, Th33 ;
0 in dom f by A49, XXREAL_1:1;
hence contradiction by A33, A39, A46, A70, A72, A73, A76, FUNCT_1:def 8; :: thesis: verum
end;
case q3 `1 = - 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A77: q3 = |[(- 1),0 ]| by A74, EUCLID:57
.= W-min P by A1, Th32 ;
1 in dom f by A49, XXREAL_1:1;
hence contradiction by A33, A39, A50, A70, A72, A73, A77, FUNCT_1:def 8; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence for q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) st q in Lower_Arc P holds
q `2 <= 0 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
reconsider R = Upper_Arc P as non empty Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) ;
consider f2 being Function of I[01] ,((TOP-REAL 2) | R) such that
A78: ( f2 is being_homeomorphism & f2 . 0 = W-min P & f2 . 1 = E-max P ) by A3, TOPREAL1:def 2;
A79: f2 is continuous by A78, TOPS_2:def 5;
A80: f2 is one-to-one by A78, TOPS_2:def 5;
for p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) holds h2 . p = proj2 . p ;
then A81: h2 is continuous by Th35;
A82: dom f2 = the carrier of I[01] by FUNCT_2:def 1;
A83: the carrier of ((TOP-REAL 2) | R) = R by PRE_TOPC:29;
then A84: rng f2 c= the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) by XBOOLE_1:1;
dom h2 = the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) by FUNCT_2:def 1;
then A85: dom (h2 * f2) = the carrier of I[01] by A82, A84, RELAT_1:46;
rng (h2 * f2) c= the carrier of R^1 ;
then reconsider g1 = h2 * f2 as Function of I[01] ,R^1 by A85, FUNCT_2:4;
A86: ( ex p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) ex t being Real st
( 0 < t & t < 1 & f2 . t = p & p `2 < 0 ) implies for q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) st q in Upper_Arc P holds
q `2 <= 0 )
proof
assume ex p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) ex t being Real st
( 0 < t & t < 1 & f2 . t = p & p `2 < 0 ) ; :: thesis: for q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) st q in Upper_Arc P holds
q `2 <= 0

then consider p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2), t being Real such that
A87: ( 0 < t & t < 1 & f2 . t = p & p `2 < 0 ) ;
now
assume ex q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) st
( q in Upper_Arc P & q `2 > 0 ) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then consider q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A88: ( q in Upper_Arc P & q `2 > 0 ) ;
rng f2 = [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | R) by A78, TOPS_2:def 5
.= R by PRE_TOPC:def 10 ;
then consider x being set such that
A89: ( x in dom f2 & q = f2 . x ) by A88, FUNCT_1:def 5;
A90: dom f2 = [.0 ,1.] by BORSUK_1:83, FUNCT_2:def 1;
then x in { r where r is Real : ( 0 <= r & r <= 1 ) } by A89, RCOMP_1:def 1;
then consider r being Real such that
A91: ( x = r & 0 <= r & r <= 1 ) ;
A92: (h2 * f2) . r = h2 . q by A89, A91, FUNCT_1:23
.= q `2 by PSCOMP_1:def 29 ;
t in { v where v is Real : ( 0 <= v & v <= 1 ) } by A87;
then A93: t in [.0 ,1.] by RCOMP_1:def 1;
then A94: (h2 * f2) . t = h2 . p by A87, A90, FUNCT_1:23
.= p `2 by PSCOMP_1:def 29 ;
now
per cases ( r < t or t < r or t = r ) by XXREAL_0:1;
case A95: r < t ; :: thesis: contradiction
then reconsider B = [.r,t.] as non empty Subset of I[01] by A89, A91, A93, BORSUK_1:83, XXREAL_1:1, XXREAL_2:def 12;
reconsider B0 = B as Subset of I[01] ;
reconsider g = g1 | B0 as Function of (I[01] | B0),R^1 by PRE_TOPC:30;
g1 is continuous by A79, A81, Th10;
then A96: g is continuous by TOPMETR:10;
A97: Closed-Interval-TSpace r,t = I[01] | B by A87, A91, A95, TOPMETR:27, TOPMETR:30;
r in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( r <= r4 & r4 <= t ) } by A95;
then A98: r in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
t in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( r <= r4 & r4 <= t ) } by A95;
then t in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
then ( (q `2 ) * (p `2 ) < 0 & q `2 = g . r & p `2 = g . t ) by A87, A88, A92, A94, A98, FUNCT_1:72, XREAL_1:134;
then consider r1 being Real such that
A99: ( g . r1 = 0 & r < r1 & r1 < t ) by A95, A96, A97, TOPREAL5:14;
r1 in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( r <= r4 & r4 <= t ) } by A99;
then A100: r1 in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
r1 < 1 by A87, A99, XXREAL_0:2;
then r1 in { r2 where r2 is Real : ( 0 <= r2 & r2 <= 1 ) } by A91, A99;
then A101: r1 in dom f2 by A90, RCOMP_1:def 1;
then f2 . r1 in rng f2 by FUNCT_1:def 5;
then f2 . r1 in R by A83;
then f2 . r1 in P by A30;
then consider q3 being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A102: ( q3 = f2 . r1 & |.q3.| = 1 ) by A1;
A103: q3 `2 = h2 . (f2 . r1) by A102, PSCOMP_1:def 29
.= (h2 * f2) . r1 by A101, FUNCT_1:23
.= 0 by A99, A100, FUNCT_1:72 ;
then A104: 1 ^2 = ((q3 `1 ) ^2 ) + (0 ^2 ) by A102, JGRAPH_3:10
.= (q3 `1 ) ^2 ;
now
per cases ( q3 `1 = 1 or q3 `1 = - 1 ) by A104, SQUARE_1:110;
case q3 `1 = 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
end;
case q3 `1 = - 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A106: q3 = |[(- 1),0 ]| by A103, EUCLID:57
.= W-min P by A1, Th32 ;
0 in dom f2 by A90, XXREAL_1:1;
hence contradiction by A78, A80, A91, A99, A101, A102, A106, FUNCT_1:def 8; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
case A107: t < r ; :: thesis: contradiction
then reconsider B = [.t,r.] as non empty Subset of I[01] by A89, A91, A93, BORSUK_1:83, XXREAL_1:1, XXREAL_2:def 12;
reconsider B0 = B as Subset of I[01] ;
reconsider g = g1 | B0 as Function of (I[01] | B0),R^1 by PRE_TOPC:30;
g1 is continuous by A79, A81, Th10;
then A108: g is continuous by TOPMETR:10;
A109: Closed-Interval-TSpace t,r = I[01] | B by A87, A91, A107, TOPMETR:27, TOPMETR:30;
r in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( t <= r4 & r4 <= r ) } by A107;
then A110: r in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
t in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( t <= r4 & r4 <= r ) } by A107;
then t in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
then ( (q `2 ) * (p `2 ) < 0 & q `2 = g . r & p `2 = g . t ) by A87, A88, A92, A94, A110, FUNCT_1:72, XREAL_1:134;
then consider r1 being Real such that
A111: ( g . r1 = 0 & t < r1 & r1 < r ) by A107, A108, A109, TOPREAL5:14;
r1 in { r4 where r4 is Real : ( t <= r4 & r4 <= r ) } by A111;
then A112: r1 in B by RCOMP_1:def 1;
r1 < 1 by A91, A111, XXREAL_0:2;
then r1 in { r2 where r2 is Real : ( 0 <= r2 & r2 <= 1 ) } by A87, A111;
then A113: r1 in dom f2 by A90, RCOMP_1:def 1;
then f2 . r1 in rng f2 by FUNCT_1:def 5;
then f2 . r1 in R by A83;
then f2 . r1 in P by A30;
then consider q3 being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A114: ( q3 = f2 . r1 & |.q3.| = 1 ) by A1;
A115: q3 `2 = h2 . (f2 . r1) by A114, PSCOMP_1:def 29
.= (h2 * f2) . r1 by A113, FUNCT_1:23
.= 0 by A111, A112, FUNCT_1:72 ;
then A116: 1 ^2 = ((q3 `1 ) ^2 ) + (0 ^2 ) by A114, JGRAPH_3:10
.= (q3 `1 ) ^2 ;
now
per cases ( q3 `1 = 1 or q3 `1 = - 1 ) by A116, SQUARE_1:110;
case q3 `1 = 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
end;
case q3 `1 = - 1 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A118: q3 = |[(- 1),0 ]| by A115, EUCLID:57
.= W-min P by A1, Th32 ;
0 in dom f2 by A90, XXREAL_1:1;
hence contradiction by A78, A80, A87, A111, A113, A114, A118, FUNCT_1:def 8; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence for q being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) st q in Upper_Arc P holds
q `2 <= 0 ; :: thesis: verum
end;
A119: Lower_Arc P c= { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) }
proof
let x2 be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x2 in Lower_Arc P or x2 in { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) } )
assume A120: x2 in Lower_Arc P ; :: thesis: x2 in { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) }
then reconsider q3 = x2 as Point of (TOP-REAL 2) ;
q3 `2 <= 0 by A5, A6, A7, A20, A27, A34, A35, A36, A37, A45, A120, EUCLID:56;
hence x2 in { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) } by A29, A120; :: thesis: verum
end;
{ p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) } c= Lower_Arc P
proof
let x be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) } or x in Lower_Arc P )
assume x in { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) } ; :: thesis: x in Lower_Arc P
then consider p being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A121: ( p = x & p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) ;
now
per cases ( p `2 = 0 or p `2 < 0 ) by A121;
case A122: p `2 = 0 ; :: thesis: x in Lower_Arc P
consider p8 being Point of (TOP-REAL 2) such that
A123: ( p8 = p & |.p8.| = 1 ) by A1, A121;
A124: p = |[(p `1 ),(p `2 )]| by EUCLID:57;
1 = sqrt (((p `1 ) ^2 ) + ((p `2 ) ^2 )) by A123, JGRAPH_3:10
.= abs (p `1 ) by A122, COMPLEX1:158 ;
then (p `1 ) ^2 = 1 ^2 by COMPLEX1:161;
then ( p = |[1,0 ]| or p = |[(- 1),0 ]| ) by A122, A124, SQUARE_1:110;
hence x in Lower_Arc P by A1, A31, A32, A121, Th32, Th33; :: thesis: verum
end;
case A125: p `2 < 0 ; :: thesis: x in Lower_Arc P
now
assume not x in Lower_Arc P ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A126: x in Upper_Arc P by A5, A121, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
rng f2 = [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | R) by A78, TOPS_2:def 5
.= R by PRE_TOPC:def 10 ;
then consider x2 being set such that
A127: ( x2 in dom f2 & p = f2 . x2 ) by A121, A126, FUNCT_1:def 5;
dom f2 = [.0 ,1.] by BORSUK_1:83, FUNCT_2:def 1;
then x2 in { r where r is Real : ( 0 <= r & r <= 1 ) } by A127, RCOMP_1:def 1;
then consider t2 being Real such that
A128: ( x2 = t2 & 0 <= t2 & t2 <= 1 ) ;
A129: now end;
then A130: ( 0 < t2 & t2 < 1 & f2 . t2 = p & p `2 < 0 ) by A125, A127, A128, A129, XXREAL_0:1;
A131: |[0 ,1]| `1 = 0 by EUCLID:56;
A132: |[0 ,1]| `2 = 1 by EUCLID:56;
then |.|[0 ,1]|.| = sqrt ((0 ^2 ) + (1 ^2 )) by A131, JGRAPH_3:10
.= 1 by SQUARE_1:83 ;
then A133: |[0 ,1]| in { q where q is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : |.q.| = 1 } ;
hence contradiction ; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence x in Lower_Arc P ; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
end;
hence x in Lower_Arc P ; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence Lower_Arc P = { p where p is Point of (TOP-REAL 2) : ( p in P & p `2 <= 0 ) } by A119, XBOOLE_0:def 10; :: thesis: verum