let A be closed-interval Subset of REAL ; :: thesis: for f, g being Function of A,REAL st f | A is bounded & g | A is bounded & f is integrable & g is integrable holds
( f + g is integrable & integral (f + g) = (integral f) + (integral g) )
let f, g be Function of A,REAL ; :: thesis: ( f | A is bounded & g | A is bounded & f is integrable & g is integrable implies ( f + g is integrable & integral (f + g) = (integral f) + (integral g) ) )
assume that
A1:
f | A is bounded
and
A2:
g | A is bounded
and
A3:
f is integrable
and
A4:
g is integrable
; :: thesis: ( f + g is integrable & integral (f + g) = (integral f) + (integral g) )
A5:
( f | A is bounded_above & f | A is bounded_below )
by A1;
A6:
( g | A is bounded_above & g | A is bounded_below )
by A2;
A7:
(f + g) | (A /\ A) is bounded
by A1, A2, RFUNCT_1:100;
A8:
dom (upper_sum_set (f + g)) = divs A
by Def11;
A9:
dom (lower_sum_set (f + g)) = divs A
by Def12;
for D being set st D in (divs A) /\ (dom (upper_sum_set (f + g))) holds
((lower_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + ((lower_bound (rng g)) * (vol A)) <= (upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D
proof
let D be
set ;
:: thesis: ( D in (divs A) /\ (dom (upper_sum_set (f + g))) implies ((lower_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + ((lower_bound (rng g)) * (vol A)) <= (upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D )
assume A10:
D in (divs A) /\ (dom (upper_sum_set (f + g)))
;
:: thesis: ((lower_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + ((lower_bound (rng g)) * (vol A)) <= (upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D
then reconsider D =
D as
Division of
A by Def3;
D in dom (upper_sum_set (f + g))
by A10, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
(upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D = upper_sum (f + g),
D
by Def11;
then A11:
lower_sum (f + g),
D <= (upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D
by A7, Th30;
(lower_sum f,D) + (lower_sum g,D) <= lower_sum (f + g),
D
by A5, A6, Th58;
then A12:
(lower_sum f,D) + (lower_sum g,D) <= (upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D
by A11, XXREAL_0:2;
((lower_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + (lower_sum g,D) <= (lower_sum f,D) + (lower_sum g,D)
then A13:
((lower_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + (lower_sum g,D) <= (upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D
by A12, XXREAL_0:2;
((lower_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + ((lower_bound (rng g)) * (vol A)) <= ((lower_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + (lower_sum g,D)
hence
((lower_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + ((lower_bound (rng g)) * (vol A)) <= (upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D
by A13, XXREAL_0:2;
:: thesis: verum
end;
then
(upper_sum_set (f + g)) | (divs A) is bounded_below
by RFUNCT_1:88;
then A14:
rng (upper_sum_set (f + g)) is bounded_below
by Th13;
then A15:
f + g is upper_integrable
by Def13;
A16:
rng (lower_sum_set (f + g)) is bounded_above
proof
(lower_sum_set (f + g)) | (divs A) is
bounded_above
proof
for
D being
set st
D in (divs A) /\ (dom (lower_sum_set (f + g))) holds
(lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D <= ((upper_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + ((upper_bound (rng g)) * (vol A))
proof
let D be
set ;
:: thesis: ( D in (divs A) /\ (dom (lower_sum_set (f + g))) implies (lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D <= ((upper_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + ((upper_bound (rng g)) * (vol A)) )
assume A17:
D in (divs A) /\ (dom (lower_sum_set (f + g)))
;
:: thesis: (lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D <= ((upper_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + ((upper_bound (rng g)) * (vol A))
then reconsider D =
D as
Division of
A by Def3;
D in dom (lower_sum_set (f + g))
by A17, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
(lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D = lower_sum (f + g),
D
by Def12;
then A18:
(lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D <= upper_sum (f + g),
D
by A7, Th30;
upper_sum (f + g),
D <= (upper_sum f,D) + (upper_sum g,D)
by A5, A6, Th57;
then A19:
(lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D <= (upper_sum f,D) + (upper_sum g,D)
by A18, XXREAL_0:2;
(upper_sum f,D) + (upper_sum g,D) <= ((upper_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + (upper_sum g,D)
then A20:
(lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D <= ((upper_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + (upper_sum g,D)
by A19, XXREAL_0:2;
((upper_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + (upper_sum g,D) <= ((upper_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + ((upper_bound (rng g)) * (vol A))
hence
(lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D <= ((upper_bound (rng f)) * (vol A)) + ((upper_bound (rng g)) * (vol A))
by A20, XXREAL_0:2;
:: thesis: verum
end;
hence
(lower_sum_set (f + g)) | (divs A) is
bounded_above
by RFUNCT_1:87;
:: thesis: verum
end;
hence
rng (lower_sum_set (f + g)) is
bounded_above
by Th15;
:: thesis: verum
end;
then A21:
f + g is lower_integrable
by Def14;
( upper_integral (f + g) = lower_integral (f + g) & upper_integral (f + g) = (integral f) + (integral g) )
proof
dom (upper_sum_set f) <> {}
by Def11;
then A22:
rng (upper_sum_set f) is non
empty Subset of
REAL
by RELAT_1:65;
dom (lower_sum_set f) <> {}
by Def12;
then A23:
rng (lower_sum_set f) is non
empty Subset of
REAL
by RELAT_1:65;
dom (upper_sum_set g) <> {}
by Def11;
then A24:
rng (upper_sum_set g) is non
empty Subset of
REAL
by RELAT_1:65;
dom (lower_sum_set g) <> {}
by Def12;
then A25:
rng (lower_sum_set g) is non
empty Subset of
REAL
by RELAT_1:65;
A26:
for
D being
Division of
A st
D in (divs A) /\ (dom (upper_sum_set (f + g))) holds
((upper_sum_set f) . D) + ((upper_sum_set g) . D) >= upper_integral (f + g)
proof
let D be
Division of
A;
:: thesis: ( D in (divs A) /\ (dom (upper_sum_set (f + g))) implies ((upper_sum_set f) . D) + ((upper_sum_set g) . D) >= upper_integral (f + g) )
assume
D in (divs A) /\ (dom (upper_sum_set (f + g)))
;
:: thesis: ((upper_sum_set f) . D) + ((upper_sum_set g) . D) >= upper_integral (f + g)
then A27:
D in dom (upper_sum_set (f + g))
by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
(upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D in rng (upper_sum_set (f + g))
by FUNCT_1:def 5;
then A28:
(upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D >= upper_integral (f + g)
by A14, SEQ_4:def 5;
A29:
(
D in dom (upper_sum_set f) &
D in dom (upper_sum_set g) )
(upper_sum f,D) + (upper_sum g,D) >= upper_sum (f + g),
D
by A5, A6, Th57;
then
((upper_sum_set f) . D) + (upper_sum g,D) >= upper_sum (f + g),
D
by A29, Def11;
then
((upper_sum_set f) . D) + ((upper_sum_set g) . D) >= upper_sum (f + g),
D
by A29, Def11;
then
((upper_sum_set f) . D) + ((upper_sum_set g) . D) >= (upper_sum_set (f + g)) . D
by A27, Def11;
hence
((upper_sum_set f) . D) + ((upper_sum_set g) . D) >= upper_integral (f + g)
by A28, XXREAL_0:2;
:: thesis: verum
end;
A31:
for
D being
Division of
A st
D in (divs A) /\ (dom (lower_sum_set (f + g))) holds
((lower_sum_set f) . D) + ((lower_sum_set g) . D) <= lower_integral (f + g)
proof
let D be
Division of
A;
:: thesis: ( D in (divs A) /\ (dom (lower_sum_set (f + g))) implies ((lower_sum_set f) . D) + ((lower_sum_set g) . D) <= lower_integral (f + g) )
assume
D in (divs A) /\ (dom (lower_sum_set (f + g)))
;
:: thesis: ((lower_sum_set f) . D) + ((lower_sum_set g) . D) <= lower_integral (f + g)
then A32:
D in dom (lower_sum_set (f + g))
by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
(lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D in rng (lower_sum_set (f + g))
by FUNCT_1:def 5;
then A33:
(lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D <= lower_integral (f + g)
by A16, SEQ_4:def 4;
A34:
(
D in dom (lower_sum_set f) &
D in dom (lower_sum_set g) )
(lower_sum f,D) + (lower_sum g,D) <= lower_sum (f + g),
D
by A5, A6, Th58;
then
((lower_sum_set f) . D) + (lower_sum g,D) <= lower_sum (f + g),
D
by A34, Def12;
then
((lower_sum_set f) . D) + ((lower_sum_set g) . D) <= lower_sum (f + g),
D
by A34, Def12;
then
((lower_sum_set f) . D) + ((lower_sum_set g) . D) <= (lower_sum_set (f + g)) . D
by A32, Def12;
hence
((lower_sum_set f) . D) + ((lower_sum_set g) . D) <= lower_integral (f + g)
by A33, XXREAL_0:2;
:: thesis: verum
end;
for
a1 being
real number st
a1 in rng (upper_sum_set f) holds
a1 >= (upper_integral (f + g)) - (upper_integral g)
proof
let a1 be
real number ;
:: thesis: ( a1 in rng (upper_sum_set f) implies a1 >= (upper_integral (f + g)) - (upper_integral g) )
assume
a1 in rng (upper_sum_set f)
;
:: thesis: a1 >= (upper_integral (f + g)) - (upper_integral g)
then consider D1 being
Element of
divs A such that A36:
(
D1 in dom (upper_sum_set f) &
a1 = (upper_sum_set f) . D1 )
by PARTFUN1:26;
reconsider D1 =
D1 as
Division of
A by Def3;
A37:
a1 = upper_sum f,
D1
by A36, Def11;
for
a2 being
real number st
a2 in rng (upper_sum_set g) holds
a2 >= (upper_integral (f + g)) - a1
proof
let a2 be
real number ;
:: thesis: ( a2 in rng (upper_sum_set g) implies a2 >= (upper_integral (f + g)) - a1 )
assume
a2 in rng (upper_sum_set g)
;
:: thesis: a2 >= (upper_integral (f + g)) - a1
then consider D2 being
Element of
divs A such that A38:
(
D2 in dom (upper_sum_set g) &
a2 = (upper_sum_set g) . D2 )
by PARTFUN1:26;
reconsider D2 =
D2 as
Division of
A by Def3;
A39:
a2 = upper_sum g,
D2
by A38, Def11;
consider D being
Division of
A such that A40:
(
D1 <= D &
D2 <= D )
by Th49;
A43:
D in divs A
by Def3;
then A41:
((upper_sum_set f) . D) + ((upper_sum_set g) . D) >= upper_integral (f + g)
by A8, A26;
A42:
(
D in dom (upper_sum_set f) &
D in dom (upper_sum_set g) )
by A43, Def11;
then
(upper_sum_set f) . D = upper_sum f,
D
by Def11;
then A44:
(upper_sum_set f) . D <= upper_sum f,
D1
by A5, A40, Th47;
(upper_sum_set g) . D = upper_sum g,
D
by A42, Def11;
then
(upper_sum_set g) . D <= upper_sum g,
D2
by A6, A40, Th47;
then
((upper_sum_set f) . D) + ((upper_sum_set g) . D) <= (upper_sum f,D1) + (upper_sum g,D2)
by A44, XREAL_1:9;
then
(upper_sum f,D1) + (upper_sum g,D2) >= upper_integral (f + g)
by A41, XXREAL_0:2;
hence
a2 >= (upper_integral (f + g)) - a1
by A37, A39, XREAL_1:22;
:: thesis: verum
end;
then
lower_bound (rng (upper_sum_set g)) >= (upper_integral (f + g)) - a1
by A24, SEQ_4:60;
then
a1 + (lower_bound (rng (upper_sum_set g))) >= upper_integral (f + g)
by XREAL_1:22;
hence
a1 >= (upper_integral (f + g)) - (upper_integral g)
by XREAL_1:22;
:: thesis: verum
end;
then A45:
upper_integral f >= (upper_integral (f + g)) - (upper_integral g)
by A22, SEQ_4:60;
for
a1 being
real number st
a1 in rng (lower_sum_set f) holds
a1 <= (lower_integral (f + g)) - (lower_integral g)
proof
let a1 be
real number ;
:: thesis: ( a1 in rng (lower_sum_set f) implies a1 <= (lower_integral (f + g)) - (lower_integral g) )
assume
a1 in rng (lower_sum_set f)
;
:: thesis: a1 <= (lower_integral (f + g)) - (lower_integral g)
then consider D1 being
Element of
divs A such that A46:
(
D1 in dom (lower_sum_set f) &
a1 = (lower_sum_set f) . D1 )
by PARTFUN1:26;
reconsider D1 =
D1 as
Division of
A by Def3;
A47:
a1 = lower_sum f,
D1
by A46, Def12;
for
a2 being
real number st
a2 in rng (lower_sum_set g) holds
a2 <= (lower_integral (f + g)) - a1
proof
let a2 be
real number ;
:: thesis: ( a2 in rng (lower_sum_set g) implies a2 <= (lower_integral (f + g)) - a1 )
assume
a2 in rng (lower_sum_set g)
;
:: thesis: a2 <= (lower_integral (f + g)) - a1
then consider D2 being
Element of
divs A such that A48:
(
D2 in dom (lower_sum_set g) &
a2 = (lower_sum_set g) . D2 )
by PARTFUN1:26;
reconsider D2 =
D2 as
Division of
A by Def3;
A49:
a2 = lower_sum g,
D2
by A48, Def12;
consider D being
Division of
A such that A50:
(
D1 <= D &
D2 <= D )
by Th49;
A53:
D in divs A
by Def3;
then A51:
((lower_sum_set f) . D) + ((lower_sum_set g) . D) <= lower_integral (f + g)
by A9, A31;
A52:
(
D in dom (lower_sum_set f) &
D in dom (lower_sum_set g) )
by A53, Def12;
then
(lower_sum_set f) . D = lower_sum f,
D
by Def12;
then A54:
(lower_sum_set f) . D >= lower_sum f,
D1
by A5, A50, Th48;
(lower_sum_set g) . D = lower_sum g,
D
by A52, Def12;
then
(lower_sum_set g) . D >= lower_sum g,
D2
by A6, A50, Th48;
then
((lower_sum_set f) . D) + ((lower_sum_set g) . D) >= (lower_sum f,D1) + (lower_sum g,D2)
by A54, XREAL_1:9;
then
(lower_sum f,D1) + (lower_sum g,D2) <= lower_integral (f + g)
by A51, XXREAL_0:2;
hence
a2 <= (lower_integral (f + g)) - a1
by A47, A49, XREAL_1:21;
:: thesis: verum
end;
then
upper_bound (rng (lower_sum_set g)) <= (lower_integral (f + g)) - a1
by A25, SEQ_4:62;
then
a1 + (upper_bound (rng (lower_sum_set g))) <= lower_integral (f + g)
by XREAL_1:21;
hence
a1 <= (lower_integral (f + g)) - (lower_integral g)
by XREAL_1:21;
:: thesis: verum
end;
then
upper_bound (rng (lower_sum_set f)) <= (lower_integral (f + g)) - (lower_integral g)
by A23, SEQ_4:62;
then A55:
(lower_integral f) + (lower_integral g) <= lower_integral (f + g)
by XREAL_1:21;
A56:
upper_integral (f + g) >= lower_integral (f + g)
by A7, Th51;
A57:
(lower_integral f) + (lower_integral g) =
(upper_integral f) + (lower_integral g)
by A3, Def17
.=
(integral f) + (integral g)
by A4, Def17
;
then A58:
(integral f) + (integral g) <= upper_integral (f + g)
by A55, A56, XXREAL_0:2;
(integral f) + (upper_integral g) >= upper_integral (f + g)
by A45, XREAL_1:22;
then
upper_integral (f + g) = (integral f) + (integral g)
by A58, XXREAL_0:1;
hence
(
upper_integral (f + g) = lower_integral (f + g) &
upper_integral (f + g) = (integral f) + (integral g) )
by A55, A56, A57, XXREAL_0:1;
:: thesis: verum
end;
hence
( f + g is integrable & integral (f + g) = (integral f) + (integral g) )
by A15, A21, Def17; :: thesis: verum