let n be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: for T being connected admissible TermOrder of n
for L being non empty non degenerated right_complementable almost_left_invertible associative commutative well-unital distributive Abelian add-associative right_zeroed doubleLoopStr
for G being Subset of (Polynom-Ring n,L) st not 0_ n,L in G & ( for g1, g2, h being Polynomial of n,L st g1 in G & g2 in G & not HT g1,T, HT g2,T are_disjoint & h is_a_normal_form_of S-Poly g1,g2,T, PolyRedRel G,T holds
h = 0_ n,L ) holds
G is_Groebner_basis_wrt T
let T be connected admissible TermOrder of n; :: thesis: for L being non empty non degenerated right_complementable almost_left_invertible associative commutative well-unital distributive Abelian add-associative right_zeroed doubleLoopStr
for G being Subset of (Polynom-Ring n,L) st not 0_ n,L in G & ( for g1, g2, h being Polynomial of n,L st g1 in G & g2 in G & not HT g1,T, HT g2,T are_disjoint & h is_a_normal_form_of S-Poly g1,g2,T, PolyRedRel G,T holds
h = 0_ n,L ) holds
G is_Groebner_basis_wrt T
let L be non empty non degenerated right_complementable almost_left_invertible associative commutative well-unital distributive Abelian add-associative right_zeroed doubleLoopStr ; :: thesis: for G being Subset of (Polynom-Ring n,L) st not 0_ n,L in G & ( for g1, g2, h being Polynomial of n,L st g1 in G & g2 in G & not HT g1,T, HT g2,T are_disjoint & h is_a_normal_form_of S-Poly g1,g2,T, PolyRedRel G,T holds
h = 0_ n,L ) holds
G is_Groebner_basis_wrt T
let G be Subset of (Polynom-Ring n,L); :: thesis: ( not 0_ n,L in G & ( for g1, g2, h being Polynomial of n,L st g1 in G & g2 in G & not HT g1,T, HT g2,T are_disjoint & h is_a_normal_form_of S-Poly g1,g2,T, PolyRedRel G,T holds
h = 0_ n,L ) implies G is_Groebner_basis_wrt T )
assume A1:
not 0_ n,L in G
; :: thesis: ( ex g1, g2, h being Polynomial of n,L st
( g1 in G & g2 in G & not HT g1,T, HT g2,T are_disjoint & h is_a_normal_form_of S-Poly g1,g2,T, PolyRedRel G,T & not h = 0_ n,L ) or G is_Groebner_basis_wrt T )
assume A2:
for g1, g2, h being Polynomial of n,L st g1 in G & g2 in G & not HT g1,T, HT g2,T are_disjoint & h is_a_normal_form_of S-Poly g1,g2,T, PolyRedRel G,T holds
h = 0_ n,L
; :: thesis: G is_Groebner_basis_wrt T
for g1, g2 being Polynomial of n,L st g1 in G & g2 in G holds
PolyRedRel G,T reduces S-Poly g1,g2,T, 0_ n,L
proof
let g1,
g2 be
Polynomial of
n,
L;
:: thesis: ( g1 in G & g2 in G implies PolyRedRel G,T reduces S-Poly g1,g2,T, 0_ n,L )
assume A3:
(
g1 in G &
g2 in G )
;
:: thesis: PolyRedRel G,T reduces S-Poly g1,g2,T, 0_ n,L
now per cases
( HT g1,T, HT g2,T are_disjoint or not HT g1,T, HT g2,T are_disjoint )
;
case
HT g1,
T,
HT g2,
T are_disjoint
;
:: thesis: PolyRedRel G,T reduces S-Poly g1,g2,T, 0_ n,Lthen A4:
PolyRedRel {g1,g2},
T reduces S-Poly g1,
g2,
T,
0_ n,
L
by Th56;
then
{g1,g2} c= G
by TARSKI:def 3;
hence
PolyRedRel G,
T reduces S-Poly g1,
g2,
T,
0_ n,
L
by A4, GROEB_1:4, REWRITE1:23;
:: thesis: verum end; case A6:
not
HT g1,
T,
HT g2,
T are_disjoint
;
:: thesis: PolyRedRel G,T reduces S-Poly g1,g2,T, 0_ n,L
S-Poly g1,
g2,
T has_a_normal_form_wrt PolyRedRel G,
T
then consider h being
set such that A7:
h is_a_normal_form_of S-Poly g1,
g2,
T,
PolyRedRel G,
T
by REWRITE1:def 11;
PolyRedRel G,
T reduces S-Poly g1,
g2,
T,
h
by A7, REWRITE1:def 6;
then reconsider h =
h as
Polynomial of
n,
L by Lm1;
h = 0_ n,
L
by A2, A3, A6, A7;
hence
PolyRedRel G,
T reduces S-Poly g1,
g2,
T,
0_ n,
L
by A7, REWRITE1:def 6;
:: thesis: verum end; end; end;
hence
PolyRedRel G,
T reduces S-Poly g1,
g2,
T,
0_ n,
L
;
:: thesis: verum
end;
hence
G is_Groebner_basis_wrt T
by A1, GROEB_2:30; :: thesis: verum