let X1, X2, X be set ; :: thesis: ( X1 misses X2 implies ( Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X,[:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):] are_equipotent & card (Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X) = card [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):] ) )
assume A1:
X1 misses X2
; :: thesis: ( Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X,[:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):] are_equipotent & card (Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X) = card [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):] )
deffunc H1( Function) -> set = [($1 | X1),($1 | X2)];
consider f being Function such that
A2:
( dom f = Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X & ( for g being Function st g in Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X holds
f . g = H1(g) ) )
from FUNCT_5:sch 1();
thus
Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X,[:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):] are_equipotent
:: thesis: card (Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X) = card [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):]proof
take
f
;
:: according to WELLORD2:def 4 :: thesis: ( f is one-to-one & proj1 f = Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X & proj2 f = [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):] )
thus
f is
one-to-one
:: thesis: ( proj1 f = Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X & proj2 f = [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):] )proof
let x be
set ;
:: according to FUNCT_1:def 8 :: thesis: for b1 being set holds
( not x in proj1 f or not b1 in proj1 f or not f . x = f . b1 or x = b1 )let y be
set ;
:: thesis: ( not x in proj1 f or not y in proj1 f or not f . x = f . y or x = y )
assume A3:
(
x in dom f &
y in dom f )
;
:: thesis: ( not f . x = f . y or x = y )
then consider g1 being
Function such that A4:
(
x = g1 &
dom g1 = X1 \/ X2 &
rng g1 c= X )
by A2, FUNCT_2:def 2;
consider g2 being
Function such that A5:
(
y = g2 &
dom g2 = X1 \/ X2 &
rng g2 c= X )
by A2, A3, FUNCT_2:def 2;
A6:
(
f . x = [(g1 | X1),(g1 | X2)] &
f . y = [(g2 | X1),(g2 | X2)] )
by A2, A3, A4, A5;
assume A7:
f . x = f . y
;
:: thesis: x = y
hence
x = y
by A4, A5, FUNCT_1:9;
:: thesis: verum
end;
thus
dom f = Funcs (X1 \/ X2),
X
by A2;
:: thesis: proj2 f = [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):]
thus
rng f c= [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):]
:: according to XBOOLE_0:def 10 :: thesis: [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):] c= proj2 fproof
let x be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in rng f or x in [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):] )
assume
x in rng f
;
:: thesis: x in [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):]
then consider y being
set such that A8:
(
y in dom f &
x = f . y )
by FUNCT_1:def 5;
consider g being
Function such that A9:
(
y = g &
dom g = X1 \/ X2 &
rng g c= X )
by A2, A8, FUNCT_2:def 2;
(
rng (g | X1) c= rng g &
rng (g | X2) c= rng g &
X1 c= X1 \/ X2 &
X2 c= X1 \/ X2 )
by RELAT_1:99, XBOOLE_1:7;
then
(
dom (g | X1) = X1 &
dom (g | X2) = X2 &
rng (g | X1) c= X &
rng (g | X2) c= X )
by A9, RELAT_1:91, XBOOLE_1:1;
then
(
g | X1 in Funcs X1,
X &
g | X2 in Funcs X2,
X )
by FUNCT_2:def 2;
then
[(g | X1),(g | X2)] in [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):]
by ZFMISC_1:106;
hence
x in [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):]
by A2, A8, A9;
:: thesis: verum
end;
let x be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):] or x in proj2 f )
assume
x in [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):]
;
:: thesis: x in proj2 f
then A10:
(
x `1 in Funcs X1,
X &
x `2 in Funcs X2,
X &
x = [(x `1 ),(x `2 )] )
by MCART_1:10, MCART_1:23;
then consider g1 being
Function such that A11:
(
x `1 = g1 &
dom g1 = X1 &
rng g1 c= X )
by FUNCT_2:def 2;
consider g2 being
Function such that A12:
(
x `2 = g2 &
dom g2 = X2 &
rng g2 c= X )
by A10, FUNCT_2:def 2;
(
rng (g1 +* g2) c= (rng g1) \/ (rng g2) &
(rng g1) \/ (rng g2) c= X \/ X &
X \/ X = X )
by A11, A12, FUNCT_4:18, XBOOLE_1:13;
then
(
dom (g1 +* g2) = X1 \/ X2 &
rng (g1 +* g2) c= X )
by A11, A12, FUNCT_4:def 1, XBOOLE_1:1;
then A13:
g1 +* g2 in dom f
by A2, FUNCT_2:def 2;
then f . (g1 +* g2) =
[((g1 +* g2) | X1),((g1 +* g2) | X2)]
by A2
.=
[((g1 +* g2) | X1),g2]
by A12, FUNCT_4:24
.=
x
by A1, A10, A11, A12, FUNCT_4:34
;
hence
x in proj2 f
by A13, FUNCT_1:def 5;
:: thesis: verum
end;
hence
card (Funcs (X1 \/ X2),X) = card [:(Funcs X1,X),(Funcs X2,X):]
by CARD_1:21; :: thesis: verum