let X1, Y1, X2, Y2 be set ; :: thesis: ( X1,Y1 are_equipotent & X2,Y2 are_equipotent implies ( Funcs X1,X2, Funcs Y1,Y2 are_equipotent & card (Funcs X1,X2) = card (Funcs Y1,Y2) ) )
assume A1:
( X1,Y1 are_equipotent & X2,Y2 are_equipotent )
; :: thesis: ( Funcs X1,X2, Funcs Y1,Y2 are_equipotent & card (Funcs X1,X2) = card (Funcs Y1,Y2) )
then consider f1 being Function such that
A2:
( f1 is one-to-one & dom f1 = Y1 & rng f1 = X1 )
by WELLORD2:def 4;
consider f2 being Function such that
A3:
( f2 is one-to-one & dom f2 = X2 & rng f2 = Y2 )
by A1, WELLORD2:def 4;
Funcs X1,X2, Funcs Y1,Y2 are_equipotent
proof
deffunc H1(
Function)
-> set =
f2 * ($1 * f1);
consider F being
Function such that A4:
(
dom F = Funcs X1,
X2 & ( for
g being
Function st
g in Funcs X1,
X2 holds
F . g = H1(
g) ) )
from FUNCT_5:sch 1();
take
F
;
:: according to WELLORD2:def 4 :: thesis: ( F is one-to-one & proj1 F = Funcs X1,X2 & proj2 F = Funcs Y1,Y2 )
thus
F is
one-to-one
:: thesis: ( proj1 F = Funcs X1,X2 & proj2 F = Funcs Y1,Y2 )proof
let x be
set ;
:: according to FUNCT_1:def 8 :: thesis: for b1 being set holds
( not x in proj1 F or not b1 in proj1 F or not F . x = F . b1 or x = b1 )let y be
set ;
:: thesis: ( not x in proj1 F or not y in proj1 F or not F . x = F . y or x = y )
assume A5:
(
x in dom F &
y in dom F &
F . x = F . y )
;
:: thesis: x = y
then consider g1 being
Function such that A6:
(
x = g1 &
dom g1 = X1 &
rng g1 c= X2 )
by A4, FUNCT_2:def 2;
consider g2 being
Function such that A7:
(
y = g2 &
dom g2 = X1 &
rng g2 c= X2 )
by A4, A5, FUNCT_2:def 2;
(
F . x = f2 * (g1 * f1) &
F . x = f2 * (g2 * f1) &
rng (g1 * f1) c= X2 &
rng (g2 * f1) c= X2 &
dom (g1 * f1) = Y1 &
dom (g2 * f1) = Y1 )
by A2, A4, A5, A6, A7, RELAT_1:46, RELAT_1:47;
then A8:
g1 * f1 = g2 * f1
by A3, FUNCT_1:49;
hence
x = y
by A6, A7, FUNCT_1:9;
:: thesis: verum
end;
thus
dom F = Funcs X1,
X2
by A4;
:: thesis: proj2 F = Funcs Y1,Y2
thus
rng F c= Funcs Y1,
Y2
:: according to XBOOLE_0:def 10 :: thesis: Funcs Y1,Y2 c= proj2 Fproof
let x be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in rng F or x in Funcs Y1,Y2 )
assume
x in rng F
;
:: thesis: x in Funcs Y1,Y2
then consider y being
set such that A10:
(
y in dom F &
x = F . y )
by FUNCT_1:def 5;
consider g being
Function such that A11:
(
y = g &
dom g = X1 &
rng g c= X2 )
by A4, A10, FUNCT_2:def 2;
(
dom (g * f1) = Y1 &
rng (g * f1) c= X2 )
by A2, A11, RELAT_1:46, RELAT_1:47;
then
(
x = f2 * (g * f1) &
dom (f2 * (g * f1)) = Y1 &
rng (f2 * (g * f1)) c= Y2 )
by A3, A4, A10, A11, RELAT_1:45, RELAT_1:46;
hence
x in Funcs Y1,
Y2
by FUNCT_2:def 2;
:: thesis: verum
end;
let x be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in Funcs Y1,Y2 or x in proj2 F )
assume
x in Funcs Y1,
Y2
;
:: thesis: x in proj2 F
then consider g being
Function such that A12:
(
x = g &
dom g = Y1 &
rng g c= Y2 )
by FUNCT_2:def 2;
A13:
(
rng (f1 " ) = Y1 &
dom (f1 " ) = X1 &
dom (f2 " ) = Y2 &
rng (f2 " ) = X2 )
by A2, A3, FUNCT_1:55;
then
(
dom ((f2 " ) * g) = Y1 &
rng ((f2 " ) * g) c= X2 &
rng (((f2 " ) * g) * (f1 " )) c= rng ((f2 " ) * g) )
by A12, RELAT_1:45, RELAT_1:46;
then
(
dom (((f2 " ) * g) * (f1 " )) = X1 &
rng (((f2 " ) * g) * (f1 " )) c= X2 )
by A13, RELAT_1:46, RELAT_1:47;
then A14:
((f2 " ) * g) * (f1 " ) in dom F
by A4, FUNCT_2:def 2;
then A15:
F . (((f2 " ) * g) * (f1 " )) = f2 * ((((f2 " ) * g) * (f1 " )) * f1)
by A4;
f2 * ((((f2 " ) * g) * (f1 " )) * f1) =
f2 * (((f2 " ) * g) * ((f1 " ) * f1))
by RELAT_1:55
.=
(f2 * ((f2 " ) * g)) * ((f1 " ) * f1)
by RELAT_1:55
.=
((f2 * (f2 " )) * g) * ((f1 " ) * f1)
by RELAT_1:55
.=
((id Y2) * g) * ((f1 " ) * f1)
by A3, FUNCT_1:61
.=
((id Y2) * g) * (id Y1)
by A2, FUNCT_1:61
.=
g * (id Y1)
by A12, RELAT_1:79
.=
x
by A12, RELAT_1:78
;
hence
x in proj2 F
by A14, A15, FUNCT_1:def 5;
:: thesis: verum
end;
hence
( Funcs X1,X2, Funcs Y1,Y2 are_equipotent & card (Funcs X1,X2) = card (Funcs Y1,Y2) )
by CARD_1:21; :: thesis: verum