let E be non empty set ; :: thesis: for e being Element of E
for u being Element of E ^omega
for TS being non empty transition-system of (Lex E) \/ {(<%> E)}
for R being RedSequence of ==>.-relation TS st (R . 1) `2 = <%e%> ^ u & (R . (len R)) `2 = <%> E & not (R . 2) `2 = <%e%> ^ u holds
(R . 2) `2 = u
let e be Element of E; :: thesis: for u being Element of E ^omega
for TS being non empty transition-system of (Lex E) \/ {(<%> E)}
for R being RedSequence of ==>.-relation TS st (R . 1) `2 = <%e%> ^ u & (R . (len R)) `2 = <%> E & not (R . 2) `2 = <%e%> ^ u holds
(R . 2) `2 = u
let u be Element of E ^omega ; :: thesis: for TS being non empty transition-system of (Lex E) \/ {(<%> E)}
for R being RedSequence of ==>.-relation TS st (R . 1) `2 = <%e%> ^ u & (R . (len R)) `2 = <%> E & not (R . 2) `2 = <%e%> ^ u holds
(R . 2) `2 = u
let TS be non empty transition-system of (Lex E) \/ {(<%> E)}; :: thesis: for R being RedSequence of ==>.-relation TS st (R . 1) `2 = <%e%> ^ u & (R . (len R)) `2 = <%> E & not (R . 2) `2 = <%e%> ^ u holds
(R . 2) `2 = u
let R be RedSequence of ==>.-relation TS; :: thesis: ( (R . 1) `2 = <%e%> ^ u & (R . (len R)) `2 = <%> E & not (R . 2) `2 = <%e%> ^ u implies (R . 2) `2 = u )
assume A:
( (R . 1) `2 = <%e%> ^ u & (R . (len R)) `2 = <%> E )
; :: thesis: ( (R . 2) `2 = <%e%> ^ u or (R . 2) `2 = u )
A1:
rng R <> {}
;
(R . 1) `2 <> (R . (len R)) `2
by A, AFINSQ_1:33;
then
( len R >= 1 + 1 & 2 >= 1 )
by NAT_1:8, NAT_1:26;
then
1 + 1 in dom R
by FINSEQ_3:27;
then B:
[(R . 1),(R . 2)] in ==>.-relation TS
by A1, FINSEQ_3:34, REWRITE1:def 2;
consider p being Element of TS, v being Element of E ^omega , q being Element of TS, w being Element of E ^omega such that
C1:
R . 1 = [p,v]
and
C2:
R . 2 = [q,w]
by B, REWRITE3:31;
p,v ==>. q,w,TS
by B, C1, C2, REWRITE3:def 4;
then consider u1 being Element of E ^omega such that
D:
( p,u1 -->. q,TS & v = u1 ^ w )
by REWRITE3:22;
E:
u1 in (Lex E) \/ {(<%> E)}
by D, REWRITE3:15;