let i, j be Nat; :: thesis: for p being XFinSequence st len p = i + j holds
ex q1, q2 being XFinSequence st
( len q1 = i & len q2 = j & p = q1 ^ q2 )
defpred S1[ Nat] means for p being XFinSequence
for i, j being Nat st len p = $1 & len p = i + j holds
ex q1, q2 being XFinSequence st
( len q1 = i & len q2 = j & p = q1 ^ q2 );
A1:
S1[ 0 ]
A5:
now let n be
Nat;
:: thesis: ( S1[n] implies S1[n + 1] )assume A6:
S1[
n]
;
:: thesis: S1[n + 1]thus
S1[
n + 1]
:: thesis: verumproof
let p be
XFinSequence;
:: thesis: for i, j being Nat st len p = n + 1 & len p = i + j holds
ex q1, q2 being XFinSequence st
( len q1 = i & len q2 = j & p = q1 ^ q2 )let i,
j be
Nat;
:: thesis: ( len p = n + 1 & len p = i + j implies ex q1, q2 being XFinSequence st
( len q1 = i & len q2 = j & p = q1 ^ q2 ) )
assume A7:
(
len p = n + 1 &
len p = i + j )
;
:: thesis: ex q1, q2 being XFinSequence st
( len q1 = i & len q2 = j & p = q1 ^ q2 )
per cases
( j = 0 or j > 0 )
;
suppose
j > 0
;
:: thesis: ex q1, q2 being XFinSequence st
( len q1 = i & len q2 = j & p = q1 ^ q2 )then consider k being
Nat such that A9:
j = k + 1
by NAT_1:6;
A10:
n = i + k
by A7, A9;
p <> {}
by A7;
then consider q being
XFinSequence,
x being
set such that A11:
p = q ^ <%x%>
by AFINSQ_1:44;
n + 1 =
(len q) + (len <%x%>)
by A7, A11, AFINSQ_1:20
.=
(len q) + 1
by AFINSQ_1:36
;
then consider q1,
q2 being
XFinSequence such that A12:
(
len q1 = i &
len q2 = k &
q = q1 ^ q2 )
by A6, A10;
A13:
p = q1 ^ (q2 ^ <%x%>)
by A11, A12, AFINSQ_1:30;
len (q2 ^ <%x%>) =
(len q2) + (len <%x%>)
by AFINSQ_1:20
.=
j
by A9, A12, AFINSQ_1:36
;
hence
ex
q1,
q2 being
XFinSequence st
(
len q1 = i &
len q2 = j &
p = q1 ^ q2 )
by A12, A13;
:: thesis: verum end; end;
end; end;
for n being Nat holds S1[n]
from NAT_1:sch 2(A1, A5);
hence
for p being XFinSequence st len p = i + j holds
ex q1, q2 being XFinSequence st
( len q1 = i & len q2 = j & p = q1 ^ q2 )
; :: thesis: verum