let p be FinSequence; :: thesis: ( rng p = dom p implies p is one-to-one )
defpred S1[ Nat] means for p being FinSequence st len p = $1 & rng p = dom p holds
p is one-to-one ;
A1:
S1[ 0 ]
A2:
now let k be
Nat;
:: thesis: ( S1[k] implies S1[k + 1] )assume A3:
S1[
k]
;
:: thesis: S1[k + 1]thus
S1[
k + 1]
:: thesis: verumproof
let p be
FinSequence;
:: thesis: ( len p = k + 1 & rng p = dom p implies p is one-to-one )
set q =
p - {(k + 1)};
set x =
k + 1;
assume that A4:
len p = k + 1
and A5:
rng p = dom p
;
:: thesis: p is one-to-one
A6:
dom p = Seg (k + 1)
by A4, FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then A7:
k + 1
in rng p
by A5, FINSEQ_1:6;
now let l be
Nat;
:: thesis: ( l in dom p & l <> (k + 1) .. p implies not p . l = k + 1 )assume that A8:
l in dom p
and A9:
l <> (k + 1) .. p
and A10:
p . l = k + 1
;
:: thesis: contradiction
p . ((k + 1) .. p) = k + 1
by A5, A6, Th29, FINSEQ_1:6;
then
(
(k + 1) .. p in dom p &
p . ((k + 1) .. p) in {(k + 1)} &
p . l in {(k + 1)} )
by A7, A10, Th30, TARSKI:def 1;
then
(
(k + 1) .. p in p " {(k + 1)} &
l in p " {(k + 1)} )
by A8, FUNCT_1:def 13;
then A11:
{((k + 1) .. p),l} c= p " {(k + 1)}
by ZFMISC_1:38;
(
card {((k + 1) .. p),l} = 2 &
p " {(k + 1)} is
finite )
by A9, CARD_2:76;
then
( 2
<= card (p " {(k + 1)}) &
len (p - {(k + 1)}) = (k + 1) - (card (p " {(k + 1)})) )
by A4, A11, FINSEQ_3:66, NAT_1:44;
then
2
+ (len (p - {(k + 1)})) <= (card (p " {(k + 1)})) + ((k + 1) - (card (p " {(k + 1)})))
by XREAL_1:8;
then
((len (p - {(k + 1)})) + 1) + 1
<= k + 1
;
then
(len (p - {(k + 1)})) + 1
<= k
by XREAL_1:8;
then A12:
(
len (p - {(k + 1)}) <= k - 1 &
dom (p - {(k + 1)}) = Seg (len (p - {(k + 1)})) )
by FINSEQ_1:def 3, XREAL_1:21;
rng (p - {(k + 1)}) =
(Seg (k + 1)) \ {(k + 1)}
by A5, A6, FINSEQ_3:72
.=
Seg k
by FINSEQ_1:12
;
then A13:
card (rng (p - {(k + 1)})) = k
by FINSEQ_1:78;
A14:
card (rng (p - {(k + 1)})) c= card (dom (p - {(k + 1)}))
by CARD_1:28;
(
card (len (p - {(k + 1)})) = card (dom (p - {(k + 1)})) &
card k = card (rng (p - {(k + 1)})) )
by A12, A13, FINSEQ_1:78;
then
k <= len (p - {(k + 1)})
by A14, NAT_1:41;
then
k <= k - 1
by A12, XXREAL_0:2;
then
k + 1
<= k + 0
by XREAL_1:21;
hence
contradiction
by XREAL_1:8;
:: thesis: verum end;
then A15:
p just_once_values k + 1
by A7, Th37;
then A16:
len (p - {(k + 1)}) =
(k + 1) - 1
by A4, Th40
.=
k
;
A17:
p - {(k + 1)} = (p -| (k + 1)) ^ (p |-- (k + 1))
by A15, Th69;
rng (p - {(k + 1)}) =
(Seg (k + 1)) \ {(k + 1)}
by A5, A6, FINSEQ_3:72
.=
Seg k
by FINSEQ_1:12
;
then
dom (p - {(k + 1)}) = rng (p - {(k + 1)})
by A16, FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence
p is
one-to-one
by A3, A7, A16, A17, Th71;
:: thesis: verum
end; end;
A18:
for k being Nat holds S1[k]
from NAT_1:sch 2(A1, A2);
len p = len p
;
hence
( rng p = dom p implies p is one-to-one )
by A18; :: thesis: verum