let X be OrtAfPl; :: thesis: ( X is satisfying_TDES iff Af X is Moufangian )
( Af X is Moufangian implies X is satisfying_TDES )
proof
assume A1:
Af X is
Moufangian
;
:: thesis: X is satisfying_TDES
now let o',
a',
a1',
b',
b1',
c',
c1' be
Element of
X;
:: thesis: ( o' <> a' & o' <> a1' & o' <> b' & o' <> b1' & o' <> c' & o' <> c1' & not LIN b',b1',a' & not LIN b',b1',c' & LIN o',a',a1' & LIN o',b',b1' & LIN o',c',c1' & a',b' // a1',b1' & a',b' // o',c' & b',c' // b1',c1' implies a',c' // a1',c1' )assume A2:
(
o' <> a' &
o' <> a1' &
o' <> b' &
o' <> b1' &
o' <> c' &
o' <> c1' & not
LIN b',
b1',
a' & not
LIN b',
b1',
c' &
LIN o',
a',
a1' &
LIN o',
b',
b1' &
LIN o',
c',
c1' &
a',
b' // a1',
b1' &
a',
b' // o',
c' &
b',
c' // b1',
c1' )
;
:: thesis: a',c' // a1',c1'reconsider o =
o',
a =
a',
a1 =
a1',
b =
b',
b1 =
b1',
c =
c',
c1 =
c1' as
Element of the
carrier of
(Af X) by ANALMETR:47;
A3:
( not
LIN b,
b1,
a & not
LIN b,
b1,
c &
LIN o,
a,
a1 &
LIN o,
b,
b1 &
LIN o,
c,
c1 )
by A2, ANALMETR:55;
A4:
(
a,
b // a1,
b1 &
a,
b // o,
c &
b,
c // b1,
c1 )
by A2, ANALMETR:48;
consider M being
Subset of
(Af X) such that A5:
(
M is
being_line &
o in M &
c in M &
c1 in M )
by A3, AFF_1:33;
A6:
M // M
by A5, AFF_1:55;
A7:
not
b in M
proof
assume
b in M
;
:: thesis: contradiction
then A8:
o,
b // b,
c
by A5, A6, AFF_1:53;
LIN b,
b1,
o
by A3, AFF_1:15;
then
b,
b1 // b,
o
by AFF_1:def 1;
then
b,
b1 // o,
b
by AFF_1:13;
then
b,
b1 // b,
c
by A2, A8, AFF_1:14;
hence
contradiction
by A3, AFF_1:def 1;
:: thesis: verum
end; A9:
(
o <> c &
b <> a )
by A2, A3, AFF_1:16;
A10:
(
b,
a // b1,
a1 &
b,
c // b1,
c1 )
by A4, AFF_1:13;
b,
a // o,
c
by A4, AFF_1:13;
then
b,
a // M
by A2, A5, AFF_1:41;
then
a,
c // a1,
c1
by A1, A3, A5, A7, A9, A10, AFF_2:def 7;
hence
a',
c' // a1',
c1'
by ANALMETR:48;
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
X is
satisfying_TDES
by CONMETR:def 5;
:: thesis: verum
end;
hence
( X is satisfying_TDES iff Af X is Moufangian )
by CONMETR:7; :: thesis: verum