set cos1 = cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).];
now let y be
set ;
:: thesis: ( ( y in [.(- 1),1.] implies ex x being set st
( x in dom (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) & y = (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . x ) ) & ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) & y = (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . x ) implies y in [.(- 1),1.] ) )thus
(
y in [.(- 1),1.] implies ex
x being
set st
(
x in dom (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) &
y = (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . x ) )
:: thesis: ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) & y = (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . x ) implies y in [.(- 1),1.] )proof
assume A1:
y in [.(- 1),1.]
;
:: thesis: ex x being set st
( x in dom (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) & y = (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . x )
then reconsider y1 =
y as
Real ;
A2:
(cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).] is
continuous
;
X:
dom (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) =
[.PI ,(2 * PI ).] /\ REAL
by RELAT_1:90, SIN_COS:27
.=
[.PI ,(2 * PI ).]
by XBOOLE_1:28
;
(
PI in [.PI ,(2 * PI ).] & 2
* PI in [.PI ,(2 * PI ).] )
by Lx3, XXREAL_1:1;
then
(
(cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . PI = cos . PI &
(cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . (2 * PI ) = cos . (2 * PI ) )
by FUNCT_1:72;
then
y1 in [.((cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . PI ),((cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . (2 * PI )).] \/ [.((cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . (2 * PI )),((cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . PI ).]
by A1, SIN_COS:81, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then consider x being
Real such that A3:
x in [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]
and A4:
y1 = (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . x
by A2, Lx3, X, FCONT_2:16;
take
x
;
:: thesis: ( x in dom (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) & y = (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . x )
x in REAL /\ [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]
by A3, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence
(
x in dom (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) &
y = (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . x )
by A4, RELAT_1:90, SIN_COS:27;
:: thesis: verum
end; thus
( ex
x being
set st
(
x in dom (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) &
y = (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) . x ) implies
y in [.(- 1),1.] )
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
rng (cos | [.PI ,(2 * PI ).]) = [.(- 1),1.]
by FUNCT_1:def 5; :: thesis: verum