let a, b be Aleph; :: thesis: ( a is limit_cardinal & b in cf a implies exp a,b = Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) )
assume A1:
( a is limit_cardinal & b in cf a )
; :: thesis: exp a,b = Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)
deffunc H1( Ordinal) -> set = Funcs b,$1;
consider L being T-Sequence such that
A2:
( dom L = a & ( for A being Ordinal st A in a holds
L . A = H1(A) ) )
from ORDINAL2:sch 2();
Funcs b,a c= Union L
proof
let x be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in Funcs b,a or x in Union L )
assume
x in Funcs b,
a
;
:: thesis: x in Union L
then consider f being
Function such that A3:
(
x = f &
dom f = b &
rng f c= a )
by FUNCT_2:def 2;
reconsider f =
f as
T-Sequence by A3, ORDINAL1:def 7;
reconsider f =
f as
Ordinal-Sequence by A3, ORDINAL2:def 8;
(
sup f in a &
rng f c= sup f )
by A1, A3, Th39, ORDINAL2:67;
then
(
x in Funcs b,
(sup f) &
L . (sup f) = Funcs b,
(sup f) &
L . (sup f) in rng L )
by A2, A3, FUNCT_1:def 5, FUNCT_2:def 2;
hence
x in Union L
by TARSKI:def 4;
:: thesis: verum
end;
then
( card (Funcs b,a) c= card (Union L) & card (Union L) c= Sum (Card L) )
by CARD_1:27, CARD_3:54;
then
card (Funcs b,a) c= Sum (Card L)
by XBOOLE_1:1;
then A4:
exp a,b c= Sum (Card L)
by CARD_2:def 3;
A5:
Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) c= exp a,b
by Th45;
A6:
( dom (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) = a & dom (Card L) = dom L )
by CARD_3:def 2, FUNCOP_1:19;
now let x be
set ;
:: thesis: ( x in a implies (Card L) . x c= (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) . x )assume A7:
x in a
;
:: thesis: (Card L) . x c= (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) . xthen reconsider x' =
x as
Ordinal ;
set m =
card x';
(
b,
b are_equipotent &
x',
card x' are_equipotent )
by CARD_1:def 5;
then
(
L . x = Funcs b,
x' &
(Card L) . x = card (L . x) &
card (Funcs b,x') = card (Funcs b,(card x')) &
card x' c= x' )
by A2, A7, CARD_1:24, CARD_3:def 2, FUNCT_5:67;
then A8:
(
(Card L) . x = exp (card x'),
b &
card x' in a )
by A7, CARD_2:def 3, ORDINAL1:22;
then
card x' in dom (b -powerfunc_of a)
by Def3;
then
(
(b -powerfunc_of a) . (card x) = exp (card x),
b &
(b -powerfunc_of a) . (card x) in rng (b -powerfunc_of a) )
by A8, Def3, FUNCT_1:def 5;
then
(
card (exp (card x),b) c= card (Union (b -powerfunc_of a)) &
card (Union (b -powerfunc_of a)) c= Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) )
by CARD_1:27, CARD_3:55, ZFMISC_1:92;
then
(
card (exp (card x),b) c= Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) &
card (exp (card x),b) = exp (card x),
b )
by CARD_1:def 5, XBOOLE_1:1;
hence
(Card L) . x c= (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) . x
by A7, A8, FUNCOP_1:13;
:: thesis: verum end;
then
( Sum (Card L) c= Sum (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) & Sum (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) = a *` (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)) )
by A2, A6, CARD_3:43, CARD_3:52;
then A9:
exp a,b c= a *` (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))
by A4, XBOOLE_1:1;
a c= Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)
proof
let x be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in a or x in Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) )
assume A10:
x in a
;
:: thesis: x in Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)
then reconsider x' =
x as
Ordinal ;
set m =
card x';
card x' in a
by A10, CARD_1:24, ORDINAL1:22;
then
(
nextcard (card x') c= a &
nextcard (card x') <> a )
by A1, CARD_1:def 7, CARD_3:107;
then A11:
nextcard (card x') in a
by CARD_1:13;
then
nextcard (card x') in dom (b -powerfunc_of a)
by Def3;
then
(
(b -powerfunc_of a) . (nextcard (card x')) in rng (b -powerfunc_of a) &
(b -powerfunc_of a) . (nextcard (card x')) = exp (nextcard (card x')),
b )
by A11, Def3, FUNCT_1:def 5;
then
exp (nextcard (card x')),
b c= Union (b -powerfunc_of a)
by ZFMISC_1:92;
then
(
card (exp (nextcard (card x')),b) = exp (nextcard (card x')),
b &
card (exp (nextcard (card x')),b) c= card (Union (b -powerfunc_of a)) &
card (Union (b -powerfunc_of a)) c= Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) )
by CARD_1:27, CARD_1:def 5, CARD_3:55;
then
(
exp (nextcard (card x')),
b c= Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) &
nextcard (card x') c= exp (nextcard (card x')),
b )
by Th31, XBOOLE_1:1;
then A12:
nextcard (card x) c= Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)
by XBOOLE_1:1;
card x = card (card x)
;
then
(
x' in nextcard x' &
nextcard (card x) = nextcard x )
by CARD_1:36, CARD_3:105;
hence
x in Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)
by A12;
:: thesis: verum
end;
then
a *` (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)) = Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)
by Th27;
hence
exp a,b = Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)
by A5, A9, XBOOLE_0:def 10; :: thesis: verum