let X be BCI-algebra; :: thesis: for x being Element of X
for n being Element of NAT holds (((0. X),x to_power n) ` ) ` = (0. X),x to_power n
let x be Element of X; :: thesis: for n being Element of NAT holds (((0. X),x to_power n) ` ) ` = (0. X),x to_power n
let n be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: (((0. X),x to_power n) ` ) ` = (0. X),x to_power n
defpred S1[ set ] means for m being Element of NAT st m = $1 & m <= n holds
(((0. X),x to_power m) ` ) ` = (0. X),x to_power m;
then A1:
S1[ 0 ]
;
A2:
for k being Element of NAT st S1[k] holds
S1[k + 1]
proof
now let k be
Element of
NAT ;
:: thesis: ( ( for m being Element of NAT st m = k & m <= n holds
(((0. X),x to_power m) ` ) ` = (0. X),x to_power m ) implies for m being Element of NAT st m = k + 1 & m <= n holds
(((0. X),x to_power (k + 1)) ` ) ` = (0. X),x to_power (k + 1) )assume A3:
for
m being
Element of
NAT st
m = k &
m <= n holds
(((0. X),x to_power m) ` ) ` = (0. X),
x to_power m
;
:: thesis: for m being Element of NAT st m = k + 1 & m <= n holds
(((0. X),x to_power (k + 1)) ` ) ` = (0. X),x to_power (k + 1)let m be
Element of
NAT ;
:: thesis: ( m = k + 1 & m <= n implies (((0. X),x to_power (k + 1)) ` ) ` = (0. X),x to_power (k + 1) )assume
(
m = k + 1 &
m <= n )
;
:: thesis: (((0. X),x to_power (k + 1)) ` ) ` = (0. X),x to_power (k + 1)then A4:
k <= n
by NAT_1:13;
(((0. X),x to_power (k + 1)) ` ) ` =
((((0. X),x to_power k) \ x) ` ) `
by Th4
.=
((((0. X),x to_power k) ` ) \ (x ` )) `
by BCIALG_1:9
.=
((((0. X),x to_power k) ` ) ` ) \ ((x ` ) ` )
by BCIALG_1:9
.=
((0. X),x to_power k) \ ((x ` ) ` )
by A3, A4
.=
(((x ` ) ` ) ` ),
x to_power k
by Th7
.=
(x ` ),
x to_power k
by BCIALG_1:8
.=
((0. X),x to_power k) \ x
by Th7
;
hence
(((0. X),x to_power (k + 1)) ` ) ` = (0. X),
x to_power (k + 1)
by Th4;
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
for
k being
Element of
NAT st
S1[
k] holds
S1[
k + 1]
;
:: thesis: verum
end;
for n being Element of NAT holds S1[n]
from NAT_1:sch 1(A1, A2);
hence
(((0. X),x to_power n) ` ) ` = (0. X),x to_power n
; :: thesis: verum