let n be Ordinal; :: thesis: for o being TermOrder of n st ( for a, b, c being bag of st [a,b] in o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in o ) & o is_strongly_connected_in Bags n holds
Graded o is admissible
let o be TermOrder of n; :: thesis: ( ( for a, b, c being bag of st [a,b] in o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in o ) & o is_strongly_connected_in Bags n implies Graded o is admissible )
assume that
A1:
for a, b, c being bag of st [a,b] in o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in o
and
A2:
o is_strongly_connected_in Bags n
; :: thesis: Graded o is admissible
now let x,
y be
set ;
:: thesis: ( x in Bags n & y in Bags n & not [x,y] in Graded o implies [b2,b1] in Graded o )assume A3:
(
x in Bags n &
y in Bags n )
;
:: thesis: ( not [x,y] in Graded o implies [b2,b1] in Graded o )reconsider x' =
x,
y' =
y as
bag of
by A3, POLYNOM1:def 14;
assume A4:
not
[x,y] in Graded o
;
:: thesis: [b2,b1] in Graded othen A5:
TotDegree x' >= TotDegree y'
by A1, Def9;
end;
hence
Graded o is_strongly_connected_in Bags n
by RELAT_2:def 7; :: according to BAGORDER:def 7 :: thesis: ( ( for a being bag of holds [(EmptyBag n),a] in Graded o ) & ( for a, b, c being bag of st [a,b] in Graded o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in Graded o ) )
hence
for a being bag of holds [(EmptyBag n),a] in Graded o
; :: thesis: for a, b, c being bag of st [a,b] in Graded o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in Graded o
hence
for a, b, c being bag of st [a,b] in Graded o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in Graded o
; :: thesis: verum