let POS be OrtAfSp; :: thesis: ( Af POS is AffinPlane implies POS is OrtAfPl )
assume A1:
Af POS is AffinPlane
; :: thesis: POS is OrtAfPl
A2:
for a, b, c being Element of POS ex x being Element of POS st
( a,b _|_ c,x & c <> x )
by Def9;
now let a,
b,
c,
d,
p,
q,
r,
s be
Element of
POS;
:: thesis: ( ( a,b _|_ a,b implies a = b ) & a,b _|_ c,c & ( a,b _|_ c,d implies ( a,b _|_ d,c & c,d _|_ a,b ) ) & ( a,b _|_ p,q & a,b // r,s & not p,q _|_ r,s implies a = b ) & ( a,b _|_ p,q & a,b _|_ r,s & not p,q // r,s implies a = b ) )thus
( (
a,
b _|_ a,
b implies
a = b ) &
a,
b _|_ c,
c & (
a,
b _|_ c,
d implies (
a,
b _|_ d,
c &
c,
d _|_ a,
b ) ) & (
a,
b _|_ p,
q &
a,
b // r,
s & not
p,
q _|_ r,
s implies
a = b ) )
by Def9;
:: thesis: ( a,b _|_ p,q & a,b _|_ r,s & not p,q // r,s implies a = b )thus
(
a,
b _|_ p,
q &
a,
b _|_ r,
s & not
p,
q // r,
s implies
a = b )
:: thesis: verumproof
assume A3:
(
a,
b _|_ p,
q &
a,
b _|_ r,
s )
;
:: thesis: ( p,q // r,s or a = b )
assume A4:
( not
p,
q // r,
s & not
a = b )
;
:: thesis: contradiction
reconsider a' =
a,
b' =
b,
p' =
p,
q' =
q,
r' =
r,
s' =
s as
Element of
(Af POS) ;
A5:
not
p',
q' // r',
s'
by A4, Th48;
then A6:
(
p' <> q' &
r' <> s' )
by AFF_1:12;
consider x' being
Element of
(Af POS) such that A7:
(
LIN p',
q',
x' &
LIN r',
s',
x' )
by A1, A5, AFF_1:74;
reconsider x =
x' as
Element of
POS ;
A8:
(
p,
q _|_ a,
b &
r,
s _|_ a,
b )
by A3, Def9;
(
LIN q',
p',
x' &
LIN s',
r',
x' )
by A7, AFF_1:15;
then
(
q',
p' // q',
x' &
s',
r' // s',
x' &
p',
q' // p',
x' &
r',
s' // r',
x' )
by A7, AFF_1:def 1;
then A9:
(
p',
q' // x',
q' &
r',
s' // x',
s' &
p',
q' // x',
p' &
r',
s' // x',
r' )
by AFF_1:13;
then
(
p,
q // x,
q &
r,
s // x,
s &
p,
q // x,
p &
r,
s // x,
r )
by Th48;
then A10:
(
a,
b _|_ x,
q &
a,
b _|_ x,
p &
a,
b _|_ x,
r &
a,
b _|_ x,
s )
by A6, A8, Def9;
then A11:
(
x,
q _|_ a,
b &
x,
p _|_ a,
b &
x,
r _|_ a,
b &
x,
s _|_ a,
b )
by Def9;
A12:
now assume A13:
(
x <> p &
x <> r )
;
:: thesis: contradictionconsider y' being
Element of
(Af POS) such that A14:
(
a',
b' // p',
y' &
p' <> y' )
by DIRAF:47;
not
p',
y' // x',
r'
proof
assume
p',
y' // x',
r'
;
:: thesis: contradiction
then
p',
y' // r',
s'
by A9, A13, AFF_1:14;
then
r',
s' // a',
b'
by A14, AFF_1:14;
then
r,
s // a,
b
by Th48;
then
a,
b _|_ a,
b
by A6, A8, Def9;
hence
contradiction
by A4, Def9;
:: thesis: verum
end; then consider z' being
Element of
(Af POS) such that A15:
(
LIN p',
y',
z' &
LIN x',
r',
z' )
by A1, AFF_1:74;
reconsider z =
z' as
Element of the
carrier of
POS ;
A16:
(
p',
y' // p',
z' &
x',
r' // x',
z' )
by A15, AFF_1:def 1;
then
a',
b' // p',
z'
by A14, AFF_1:14;
then A17:
a,
b // p,
z
by Th48;
x,
r // x,
z
by A16, Th48;
then
a,
b _|_ x,
z
by A11, A13, Def9;
then
a,
b _|_ p,
z
by A10, Def9;
then
p,
z _|_ p,
z
by A4, A17, Def9;
then
x',
r' // x',
p'
by A16, Def9;
then A18:
LIN x',
r',
p'
by AFF_1:def 1;
(
LIN x',
r',
x' &
LIN x',
p',
q' )
by A7, AFF_1:15, AFF_1:16;
then
LIN x',
r',
q'
by A13, A18, AFF_1:20;
then
x',
r' // p',
q'
by A18, AFF_1:19;
then
p',
q' // r',
s'
by A9, A13, AFF_1:14;
hence
contradiction
by A4, Th48;
:: thesis: verum end;
A19:
now assume A20:
(
x <> p &
x <> s )
;
:: thesis: contradictionconsider y' being
Element of
(Af POS) such that A21:
(
a',
b' // p',
y' &
p' <> y' )
by DIRAF:47;
not
p',
y' // x',
s'
proof
assume
p',
y' // x',
s'
;
:: thesis: contradiction
then
p',
y' // r',
s'
by A9, A20, AFF_1:14;
then
r',
s' // a',
b'
by A21, AFF_1:14;
then
r,
s // a,
b
by Th48;
then
a,
b _|_ a,
b
by A6, A8, Def9;
hence
contradiction
by A4, Def9;
:: thesis: verum
end; then consider z' being
Element of
(Af POS) such that A22:
(
LIN p',
y',
z' &
LIN x',
s',
z' )
by A1, AFF_1:74;
reconsider z =
z' as
Element of the
carrier of
POS ;
A23:
(
p',
y' // p',
z' &
x',
s' // x',
z' )
by A22, AFF_1:def 1;
then
a',
b' // p',
z'
by A21, AFF_1:14;
then A24:
a,
b // p,
z
by Th48;
x,
s // x,
z
by A23, Th48;
then
a,
b _|_ x,
z
by A11, A20, Def9;
then
a,
b _|_ p,
z
by A10, Def9;
then
p,
z _|_ p,
z
by A4, A24, Def9;
then
x',
s' // x',
p'
by A23, Def9;
then A25:
LIN x',
s',
p'
by AFF_1:def 1;
(
LIN x',
s',
x' &
LIN x',
p',
q' )
by A7, AFF_1:15, AFF_1:16;
then
LIN x',
s',
q'
by A20, A25, AFF_1:20;
then
x',
s' // p',
q'
by A25, AFF_1:19;
then
p',
q' // r',
s'
by A9, A20, AFF_1:14;
hence
contradiction
by A4, Th48;
:: thesis: verum end;
A26:
now assume A27:
(
x <> q &
x <> r )
;
:: thesis: contradictionconsider y' being
Element of
(Af POS) such that A28:
(
a',
b' // q',
y' &
q' <> y' )
by DIRAF:47;
not
q',
y' // x',
r'
proof
assume
q',
y' // x',
r'
;
:: thesis: contradiction
then
q',
y' // r',
s'
by A9, A27, AFF_1:14;
then
r',
s' // a',
b'
by A28, AFF_1:14;
then
r,
s // a,
b
by Th48;
then
a,
b _|_ a,
b
by A6, A8, Def9;
hence
contradiction
by A4, Def9;
:: thesis: verum
end; then consider z' being
Element of
(Af POS) such that A29:
(
LIN q',
y',
z' &
LIN x',
r',
z' )
by A1, AFF_1:74;
reconsider z =
z' as
Element of the
carrier of
POS ;
A30:
(
q',
y' // q',
z' &
x',
r' // x',
z' )
by A29, AFF_1:def 1;
then
a',
b' // q',
z'
by A28, AFF_1:14;
then A31:
a,
b // q,
z
by Th48;
x,
r // x,
z
by A30, Th48;
then
a,
b _|_ x,
z
by A11, A27, Def9;
then
a,
b _|_ q,
z
by A10, Def9;
then
q,
z _|_ q,
z
by A4, A31, Def9;
then
x',
r' // x',
q'
by A30, Def9;
then A32:
LIN x',
r',
q'
by AFF_1:def 1;
(
LIN x',
r',
x' &
LIN x',
q',
p' )
by A7, AFF_1:15, AFF_1:16;
then
LIN x',
r',
p'
by A27, A32, AFF_1:20;
then
x',
r' // p',
q'
by A32, AFF_1:19;
then
p',
q' // r',
s'
by A9, A27, AFF_1:14;
hence
contradiction
by A4, Th48;
:: thesis: verum end;
now assume A33:
(
x <> q &
x <> s )
;
:: thesis: contradictionconsider y' being
Element of
(Af POS) such that A34:
(
a',
b' // q',
y' &
q' <> y' )
by DIRAF:47;
not
q',
y' // x',
s'
proof
assume
q',
y' // x',
s'
;
:: thesis: contradiction
then
q',
y' // r',
s'
by A9, A33, AFF_1:14;
then
r',
s' // a',
b'
by A34, AFF_1:14;
then
r,
s // a,
b
by Th48;
then
a,
b _|_ a,
b
by A6, A8, Def9;
hence
contradiction
by A4, Def9;
:: thesis: verum
end; then consider z' being
Element of
(Af POS) such that A35:
(
LIN q',
y',
z' &
LIN x',
s',
z' )
by A1, AFF_1:74;
reconsider z =
z' as
Element of the
carrier of
POS ;
A36:
(
q',
y' // q',
z' &
x',
s' // x',
z' )
by A35, AFF_1:def 1;
then
a',
b' // q',
z'
by A34, AFF_1:14;
then A37:
a,
b // q,
z
by Th48;
x,
s // x,
z
by A36, Th48;
then
a,
b _|_ x,
z
by A11, A33, Def9;
then
a,
b _|_ q,
z
by A10, Def9;
then
q,
z _|_ q,
z
by A4, A37, Def9;
then
x',
s' // x',
q'
by A36, Def9;
then A38:
LIN x',
s',
q'
by AFF_1:def 1;
(
LIN x',
s',
x' &
LIN x',
q',
p' )
by A7, AFF_1:15, AFF_1:16;
then
LIN x',
s',
p'
by A33, A38, AFF_1:20;
then
x',
s' // p',
q'
by A38, AFF_1:19;
then
p',
q' // r',
s'
by A9, A33, AFF_1:14;
hence
contradiction
by A4, Th48;
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
contradiction
by A5, A12, A19, A26, AFF_1:12;
:: thesis: verum
end; end;
hence
POS is OrtAfPl
by A1, A2, Def10; :: thesis: verum