let il be Instruction-Location of SCM ; :: thesis: NIC (halt SCM ),il = {il}

now

let x be set ; :: thesis: ( x in {il} iff x in { (IC (Following s)) where s is State of SCM : ( IC s = il & s . il = halt SCM ) } )

A1: now

assume A2: x = il ; :: thesis: x in { (IC (Following s)) where s is State of SCM : ( IC s = il & s . il = halt SCM ) }
consider t being State of SCM ;
il in NAT by AMI_1:def 4;
then reconsider il1 = il as Element of ObjectKind (IC SCM ) by AMI_1:def 11;
reconsider I = halt SCM as Element of ObjectKind il by AMI_1:def 14;
set u = t +* ((IC SCM ),il --> il1,I);
dom ((IC SCM ),il --> il1,I) = {(IC SCM ),il} by FUNCT_4:65;
then A3: IC SCM in dom ((IC SCM ),il --> il1,I) by TARSKI:def 2;
A5: (t +* ((IC SCM ),il --> il1,I)) . il = halt SCM by AMI_1:129;
A6: IC (t +* ((IC SCM ),il --> il1,I)) = il by AMI_1:129;
then IC (Following (t +* ((IC SCM ),il --> il1,I))) = (t +* ((IC SCM ),il --> il1,I)) . (IC SCM ) by A5, AMI_1:def 8
.= ((IC SCM ),il --> il1,I) . (IC SCM ) by A3, FUNCT_4:14
.= il by AMI_1:48, FUNCT_4:66 ;
hence x in { (IC (Following s)) where s is State of SCM : ( IC s = il & s . il = halt SCM ) } by A2, A5, A6; :: thesis: verum

end;

now

assume x in { (IC (Following s)) where s is State of SCM : ( IC s = il & s . il = halt SCM ) } ; :: thesis: x = il
then consider s being State of SCM such that
A7: ( x = IC (Following s) & IC s = il & s . il = halt SCM ) ;
thus x = il by A7, AMI_1:def 8; :: thesis: verum

end;

hence ( x in {il} iff x in { (IC (Following s)) where s is State of SCM : ( IC s = il & s . il = halt SCM ) } ) by A1, TARSKI:def 1; :: thesis: verum

end;

hence NIC (halt SCM ),il = {il} by TARSKI:2; :: thesis: verum