let n be Nat; :: thesis: for K being Fanoian Field
for p2 being Element of Permutations (n + 2)
for X, Y being Element of Fin (2Set (Seg (n + 2))) st Y = { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s = - (1_ K) ) } holds
the multF of K $$ X,(Part_sgn p2,K) = (power K) . (- (1_ K)),(card Y)
let K be Fanoian Field; :: thesis: for p2 being Element of Permutations (n + 2)
for X, Y being Element of Fin (2Set (Seg (n + 2))) st Y = { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s = - (1_ K) ) } holds
the multF of K $$ X,(Part_sgn p2,K) = (power K) . (- (1_ K)),(card Y)
let p2 be Element of Permutations (n + 2); :: thesis: for X, Y being Element of Fin (2Set (Seg (n + 2))) st Y = { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s = - (1_ K) ) } holds
the multF of K $$ X,(Part_sgn p2,K) = (power K) . (- (1_ K)),(card Y)
set n2 = n + 2;
let X, Y be Element of Fin (2Set (Seg (n + 2))); :: thesis: ( Y = { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s = - (1_ K) ) } implies the multF of K $$ X,(Part_sgn p2,K) = (power K) . (- (1_ K)),(card Y) )
assume A1:
Y = { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s = - (1_ K) ) }
; :: thesis: the multF of K $$ X,(Part_sgn p2,K) = (power K) . (- (1_ K)),(card Y)
reconsider ID = id (Seg (n + 2)) as Element of Permutations (n + 2) by MATRIX_2:def 11;
A2:
for x being set st x in X holds
(Part_sgn ID,K) . x = 1_ K
set Y' = { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s <> (Part_sgn ID,K) . s ) } ;
A5:
Y c= { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s <> (Part_sgn ID,K) . s ) }
proof
let y be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not y in Y or y in { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s <> (Part_sgn ID,K) . s ) } )
assume
y in Y
;
:: thesis: y in { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s <> (Part_sgn ID,K) . s ) }
then consider s being
Element of
2Set (Seg (n + 2)) such that A6:
(
s = y &
s in X &
(Part_sgn p2,K) . s = - (1_ K) )
by A1;
(
(Part_sgn ID,K) . s = 1_ K &
1_ K <> - (1_ K) )
by A2, A6, MATRIX11:22;
hence
y in { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s <> (Part_sgn ID,K) . s ) }
by A6;
:: thesis: verum
end;
{ s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s <> (Part_sgn ID,K) . s ) } c= Y
proof
let y be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not y in { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s <> (Part_sgn ID,K) . s ) } or y in Y )
assume
y in { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s <> (Part_sgn ID,K) . s ) }
;
:: thesis: y in Y
then consider s being
Element of
2Set (Seg (n + 2)) such that A7:
(
y = s &
s in X &
(Part_sgn p2,K) . s <> (Part_sgn ID,K) . s )
;
(Part_sgn ID,K) . s = 1_ K
by A2, A7;
then
(Part_sgn p2,K) . s = - (1_ K)
by A7, MATRIX11:5;
hence
y in Y
by A1, A7;
:: thesis: verum
end;
then A8:
Y = { s where s is Element of 2Set (Seg (n + 2)) : ( s in X & (Part_sgn p2,K) . s <> (Part_sgn ID,K) . s ) }
by A5, XBOOLE_0:def 10;