let f be Function; :: thesis: ( f is one-to-one iff for g, h being Function st rng g c= dom f & rng h c= dom f & dom g = dom h & f * g = f * h holds
g = h )
thus
( f is one-to-one implies for g, h being Function st rng g c= dom f & rng h c= dom f & dom g = dom h & f * g = f * h holds
g = h )
:: thesis: ( ( for g, h being Function st rng g c= dom f & rng h c= dom f & dom g = dom h & f * g = f * h holds
g = h ) implies f is one-to-one )
assume A6:
for g, h being Function st rng g c= dom f & rng h c= dom f & dom g = dom h & f * g = f * h holds
g = h
; :: thesis: f is one-to-one
for x1, x2 being set st x1 in dom f & x2 in dom f & f . x1 = f . x2 holds
x1 = x2
proof
let x1,
x2 be
set ;
:: thesis: ( x1 in dom f & x2 in dom f & f . x1 = f . x2 implies x1 = x2 )
assume that A7:
(
x1 in dom f &
x2 in dom f )
and A8:
f . x1 = f . x2
;
:: thesis: x1 = x2
deffunc H1(
set )
-> set =
x1;
consider g being
Function such that A9:
dom g = {{} }
and A10:
for
x being
set st
x in {{} } holds
g . x = H1(
x)
from FUNCT_1:sch 3();
deffunc H2(
set )
-> set =
x2;
consider h being
Function such that A11:
dom h = {{} }
and A12:
for
x being
set st
x in {{} } holds
h . x = H2(
x)
from FUNCT_1:sch 3();
{} in {{} }
by TARSKI:def 1;
then A13:
(
g . {} = x1 &
h . {} = x2 )
by A10, A12;
then
(
rng g = {x1} &
rng h = {x2} )
by A9, A11, Th14;
then A14:
(
rng g c= dom f &
rng h c= dom f )
by A7, ZFMISC_1:37;
then A15:
(
dom (f * g) = dom g &
dom (f * h) = dom h )
by RELAT_1:46;
for
x being
set st
x in dom (f * g) holds
(f * g) . x = (f * h) . x
hence
x1 = x2
by A6, A13, A14, A9, A11, A15, Th9;
:: thesis: verum
end;
hence
f is one-to-one
by Def8; :: thesis: verum