let I be set ; :: thesis: for A being ManySortedSet of I
for B being V2 ManySortedSet of I
for F being ManySortedFunction of A,B st A is non-empty & B is non-empty holds
( F is "1-1" iff for C being ManySortedSet of I
for G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st F ** G = F ** H holds
G = H )
let A be ManySortedSet of I; :: thesis: for B being V2 ManySortedSet of I
for F being ManySortedFunction of A,B st A is non-empty & B is non-empty holds
( F is "1-1" iff for C being ManySortedSet of I
for G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st F ** G = F ** H holds
G = H )
let B be V2 ManySortedSet of I; :: thesis: for F being ManySortedFunction of A,B st A is non-empty & B is non-empty holds
( F is "1-1" iff for C being ManySortedSet of I
for G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st F ** G = F ** H holds
G = H )
let F be ManySortedFunction of A,B; :: thesis: ( A is non-empty & B is non-empty implies ( F is "1-1" iff for C being ManySortedSet of I
for G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st F ** G = F ** H holds
G = H ) )
assume A1:
( A is non-empty & B is non-empty )
; :: thesis: ( F is "1-1" iff for C being ManySortedSet of I
for G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st F ** G = F ** H holds
G = H )
thus
( F is "1-1" implies for C being ManySortedSet of I
for G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st F ** G = F ** H holds
G = H )
:: thesis: ( ( for C being ManySortedSet of I
for G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st F ** G = F ** H holds
G = H ) implies F is "1-1" )proof
assume A2:
F is
"1-1"
;
:: thesis: for C being ManySortedSet of I
for G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st F ** G = F ** H holds
G = H
let C be
ManySortedSet of
I;
:: thesis: for G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st F ** G = F ** H holds
G = Hlet G,
H be
ManySortedFunction of
C,
A;
:: thesis: ( F ** G = F ** H implies G = H )
assume A3:
F ** G = F ** H
;
:: thesis: G = H
now let i be
set ;
:: thesis: ( i in I implies G . i = H . i )assume A4:
i in I
;
:: thesis: G . i = H . ithen A5:
(
A . i <> {} &
B . i <> {} )
by A1;
reconsider f =
F . i as
Function of
A . i,
B . i by A4, PBOOLE:def 18;
reconsider g =
G . i as
Function of
C . i,
A . i by A4, PBOOLE:def 18;
reconsider h =
H . i as
Function of
C . i,
A . i by A4, PBOOLE:def 18;
A6:
f is
one-to-one
by A2, A4, MSUALG_3:1;
f * g =
(F ** H) . i
by A3, A4, MSUALG_3:2
.=
f * h
by A4, MSUALG_3:2
;
hence
G . i = H . i
by A5, A6, FUNCT_2:27;
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
G = H
by PBOOLE:3;
:: thesis: verum
end;
assume that
A7:
for C being ManySortedSet of I
for G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st F ** G = F ** H holds
G = H
and
A8:
not F is "1-1"
; :: thesis: contradiction
consider j being set such that
A9:
( j in I & not F . j is one-to-one )
by A8, MSUALG_3:1;
A10:
( A . j <> {} & B . j <> {} )
by A1, A9;
F . j is Function of A . j,B . j
by A9, PBOOLE:def 18;
then consider Z being set such that
A11:
ex g, h being Function of Z,A . j st
( (F . j) * g = (F . j) * h & g <> h )
by A9, A10, FUNCT_2:27;
consider g, h being Function of Z,A . j such that
A12:
( (F . j) * g = (F . j) * h & g <> h )
by A11;
ex C being ManySortedSet of I ex G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st
( F ** G = F ** H & G <> H )
proof
deffunc H1(
set )
-> set =
IFEQ $1,
j,
Z,
(A . $1);
consider C being
ManySortedSet of
I such that A13:
for
i being
set st
i in I holds
C . i = H1(
i)
from PBOOLE:sch 4();
take
C
;
:: thesis: ex G, H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st
( F ** G = F ** H & G <> H )
deffunc H2(
set )
-> set =
IFEQ $1,
j,
g,
((id C) . $1);
consider G being
ManySortedSet of
I such that A14:
for
i being
set st
i in I holds
G . i = H2(
i)
from PBOOLE:sch 4();
deffunc H3(
set )
-> set =
IFEQ $1,
j,
h,
((id C) . $1);
consider H being
ManySortedSet of
I such that A15:
for
i being
set st
i in I holds
H . i = H3(
i)
from PBOOLE:sch 4();
now let G be
ManySortedSet of
I;
:: thesis: for g, h being Function of Z,A . j st (F . j) * g = (F . j) * h & g <> h & ( for i being set st i in I holds
G . i = IFEQ i,j,g,((id C) . i) ) holds
G is Function-yieldinglet g,
h be
Function of
Z,
A . j;
:: thesis: ( (F . j) * g = (F . j) * h & g <> h & ( for i being set st i in I holds
G . i = IFEQ i,j,g,((id C) . i) ) implies G is Function-yielding )assume that
(
(F . j) * g = (F . j) * h &
g <> h )
and A16:
for
i being
set st
i in I holds
G . i = IFEQ i,
j,
g,
((id C) . i)
;
:: thesis: G is Function-yieldingthus
G is
Function-yielding
:: thesis: verum end;
then reconsider G =
G,
H =
H as
ManySortedFunction of
I by A12, A14, A15;
now let G be
ManySortedFunction of
I;
:: thesis: for g, h being Function of Z,A . j st (F . j) * g = (F . j) * h & g <> h & ( for i being set st i in I holds
G . i = IFEQ i,j,g,((id C) . i) ) holds
G is ManySortedFunction of C,Alet g,
h be
Function of
Z,
A . j;
:: thesis: ( (F . j) * g = (F . j) * h & g <> h & ( for i being set st i in I holds
G . i = IFEQ i,j,g,((id C) . i) ) implies G is ManySortedFunction of C,A )assume that
(
(F . j) * g = (F . j) * h &
g <> h )
and A18:
for
i being
set st
i in I holds
G . i = IFEQ i,
j,
g,
((id C) . i)
;
:: thesis: G is ManySortedFunction of C,Athus
G is
ManySortedFunction of
C,
A
:: thesis: verumproof
let i be
set ;
:: according to PBOOLE:def 18 :: thesis: ( not i in I or G . i is Relation of C . i,A . i )
assume A19:
i in I
;
:: thesis: G . i is Relation of C . i,A . i
now per cases
( i = j or i <> j )
;
case A20:
i = j
;
:: thesis: G . i is Function of C . i,A . ithen A21:
IFEQ i,
j,
g,
((id C) . i) = g
by FUNCOP_1:def 8;
A22:
C . i = IFEQ i,
j,
Z,
(A . i)
by A13, A19;
IFEQ i,
j,
Z,
(A . i) = Z
by A20, FUNCOP_1:def 8;
hence
G . i is
Function of
C . i,
A . i
by A18, A19, A20, A21, A22;
:: thesis: verum end; case A23:
i <> j
;
:: thesis: G . i is Function of C . i,A . ithen
IFEQ i,
j,
g,
((id C) . i) = (id C) . i
by FUNCOP_1:def 8;
then A24:
G . i = (id C) . i
by A18, A19;
IFEQ i,
j,
Z,
(A . i) = A . i
by A23, FUNCOP_1:def 8;
then
C . i = A . i
by A13, A19;
hence
G . i is
Function of
C . i,
A . i
by A19, A24, PBOOLE:def 18;
:: thesis: verum end; end; end;
hence
G . i is
Function of
C . i,
A . i
;
:: thesis: verum
end; end;
then reconsider G =
G,
H =
H as
ManySortedFunction of
C,
A by A12, A14, A15;
take
G
;
:: thesis: ex H being ManySortedFunction of C,A st
( F ** G = F ** H & G <> H )
take
H
;
:: thesis: ( F ** G = F ** H & G <> H )
A25:
(
F ** G is
ManySortedSet of
I &
F ** H is
ManySortedSet of
I )
by Lm1;
now let i be
set ;
:: thesis: ( i in I implies (F ** G) . i = (F ** H) . i )assume A26:
i in I
;
:: thesis: (F ** G) . i = (F ** H) . inow per cases
( i = j or i <> j )
;
case A27:
i = j
;
:: thesis: (F ** G) . i = (F ** H) . ithen
IFEQ i,
j,
g,
((id C) . i) = g
by FUNCOP_1:def 8;
then A28:
g = G . i
by A14, A26;
IFEQ i,
j,
h,
((id C) . i) = h
by A27, FUNCOP_1:def 8;
then A29:
h = H . i
by A15, A26;
thus (F ** G) . i =
(F . j) * h
by A9, A12, A27, A28, MSUALG_3:2
.=
(F ** H) . i
by A9, A27, A29, MSUALG_3:2
;
:: thesis: verum end; case A30:
i <> j
;
:: thesis: (F ** G) . i = (F ** H) . ithen A31:
IFEQ i,
j,
g,
((id C) . i) = (id C) . i
by FUNCOP_1:def 8;
A32:
IFEQ i,
j,
h,
((id C) . i) = (id C) . i
by A30, FUNCOP_1:def 8;
reconsider f' =
F . i as
Function of
A . i,
B . i by A26, PBOOLE:def 18;
reconsider g' =
G . i as
Function of
C . i,
A . i by A26, PBOOLE:def 18;
reconsider h' =
H . i as
Function of
C . i,
A . i by A26, PBOOLE:def 18;
g' =
(id C) . i
by A14, A26, A31
.=
h'
by A15, A26, A32
;
hence (F ** G) . i =
f' * h'
by A26, MSUALG_3:2
.=
(F ** H) . i
by A26, MSUALG_3:2
;
:: thesis: verum end; end; end; hence
(F ** G) . i = (F ** H) . i
;
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
F ** G = F ** H
by A25, PBOOLE:3;
:: thesis: G <> H
ex
i being
set st
(
i in I &
G . i <> H . i )
hence
G <> H
;
:: thesis: verum
end;
hence
contradiction
by A7; :: thesis: verum