let AP be AffinPlane; :: thesis: ( AP is satisfying_TDES_2 implies AP is satisfying_TDES_3 )
assume A1:
AP is satisfying_TDES_2
; :: thesis: AP is satisfying_TDES_3
thus
AP is satisfying_TDES_3
:: thesis: verumproof
let K be
Subset of
AP;
:: according to AFF_2:def 10 :: thesis: for o, a, b, c, a', b', c' being Element of AP st K is being_line & o in K & c in K & not a in K & o <> c & a <> b & LIN o,a,a' & LIN o,b,b' & a,b // a',b' & a,c // a',c' & b,c // b',c' & a,b // K holds
c' in Klet o,
a,
b,
c,
a',
b',
c' be
Element of
AP;
:: thesis: ( K is being_line & o in K & c in K & not a in K & o <> c & a <> b & LIN o,a,a' & LIN o,b,b' & a,b // a',b' & a,c // a',c' & b,c // b',c' & a,b // K implies c' in K )
assume A2:
(
K is
being_line &
o in K &
c in K & not
a in K &
o <> c &
a <> b &
LIN o,
a,
a' &
LIN o,
b,
b' &
a,
b // a',
b' &
a,
c // a',
c' &
b,
c // b',
c' &
a,
b // K )
;
:: thesis: c' in K
assume A3:
not
c' in K
;
:: thesis: contradiction
A4:
not
b in K
by A2, AFF_1:49;
A5:
(
o <> a &
o <> b &
a <> c &
b <> c )
by A2, AFF_1:49;
A6:
not
LIN a,
b,
c
set A =
Line o,
a;
set P =
Line o,
b;
set N =
Line b,
c;
A7:
(
Line o,
a is
being_line &
Line o,
b is
being_line &
Line b,
c is
being_line &
o in Line o,
a &
a in Line o,
a &
o in Line o,
b &
b in Line o,
b &
b in Line b,
c &
c in Line b,
c )
by A5, AFF_1:38;
then A8:
(
a' in Line o,
a &
b' in Line o,
b )
by A2, A5, AFF_1:39;
A9:
Line o,
a <> Line o,
b
A10:
a' <> b'
proof
assume A11:
a' = b'
;
:: thesis: contradiction
then
(
a,
c // b,
c or
a' = c' )
by A2, AFF_1:14;
then
(
c,
a // c,
b or
a' = c' )
by AFF_1:13;
then
(
LIN c,
a,
b or
a' = c' )
by AFF_1:def 1;
hence
contradiction
by A2, A3, A6, A7, A8, A9, A11, AFF_1:15, AFF_1:30;
:: thesis: verum
end;
A12:
a' <> c'
proof
assume
a' = c'
;
:: thesis: contradiction
then
b,
c // a',
b'
by A2, AFF_1:13;
then
a,
b // b,
c
by A2, A10, AFF_1:14;
then
b,
a // b,
c
by AFF_1:13;
then
LIN b,
a,
c
by AFF_1:def 1;
hence
contradiction
by A6, AFF_1:15;
:: thesis: verum
end;
not
a',
c' // K
then consider x being
Element of
AP such that A13:
(
x in K &
LIN a',
c',
x )
by A2, AFF_1:73;
consider T being
Subset of
AP such that A14:
(
x in T &
Line b,
c // T )
by A7, AFF_1:63;
A15:
(
T is
being_line &
T // Line b,
c )
by A14, AFF_1:50;
not
T // Line o,
b
then consider y being
Element of
AP such that A16:
(
y in T &
y in Line o,
b )
by A7, A15, AFF_1:72;
A17:
LIN o,
b,
y
by A7, A16, AFF_1:33;
A18:
b,
c // y,
x
by A7, A14, A16, AFF_1:53;
a,
c // a',
x
then
a,
b // a',
y
by A1, A2, A13, A17, A18, Def9;
then
a',
b' // a',
y
by A2, AFF_1:14;
then
LIN a',
b',
y
by AFF_1:def 1;
then
(
LIN b',
y,
a' &
LIN b',
y,
b &
LIN b',
y,
b' )
by A7, A8, A16, AFF_1:15, AFF_1:33;
then A19:
(
b' = y or
LIN b,
b',
a' )
by AFF_1:17;
A20:
now assume
y = b'
;
:: thesis: contradictionthen
b',
c' // b',
x
by A2, A5, A18, AFF_1:14;
then
LIN b',
c',
x
by AFF_1:def 1;
then
(
LIN c',
x,
b' &
LIN c',
x,
a' &
LIN c',
x,
c' )
by A13, AFF_1:15, AFF_1:16;
then
LIN a',
b',
c'
by A3, A13, AFF_1:17;
then
a',
b' // a',
c'
by AFF_1:def 1;
then
a',
b' // a,
c
by A2, A12, AFF_1:14;
then
a,
b // a,
c
by A2, A10, AFF_1:14;
hence
contradiction
by A6, AFF_1:def 1;
:: thesis: verum end;
now assume A21:
b = b'
;
:: thesis: contradictionthen
b,
a // b,
a'
by A2, AFF_1:13;
then
LIN b,
a,
a'
by AFF_1:def 1;
then
LIN a,
a',
b
by AFF_1:15;
then
(
a = a' or
b in Line o,
a )
by A7, A8, AFF_1:39;
then
(
LIN a,
c,
c' &
LIN b,
c,
c' )
by A2, A5, A7, A9, A21, AFF_1:30, AFF_1:def 1;
then
(
LIN c,
c',
a &
LIN c,
c',
b &
LIN c,
c',
c )
by AFF_1:15, AFF_1:16;
hence
contradiction
by A2, A3, A6, AFF_1:17;
:: thesis: verum end;
then
(
a' in Line o,
b &
a',
b' // b,
a )
by A2, A7, A8, A19, A20, AFF_1:13, AFF_1:39;
then
a in Line o,
b
by A7, A8, A10, AFF_1:62;
hence
contradiction
by A2, A7, A9, AFF_1:30;
:: thesis: verum
end;