[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [mizar] vocabularies
Hi Josef,
>yes; I think something really should be done with the
>environment "black magic";
I agree. I also think that given the current Mizar culture,
it just won't happen.
If even my very modest proposal to integrate the vocabulary
files into the articles is seen as a huge problem for
maintaining the MML (it isn't!) even bigger changes do not
stand any chance of happening. I fear.
>perhaps even the "constructors" directive could be made only
>optional or removed totally;
I especially am always very surprised by the "theorems"
directive. Certainly it only needs an utterly trivial pass
over the article to find out what should go in there.
I often need to run Mizar twice because I forgot to add an
article to the theorem directive. That is a serious pain
in the you-know-where.
Freek