[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [mizar] WELLFND1:1





Hi Andrzej,

Right you are. I was probably annoyed to find a generally useful theorem about functions in an article on well-foundedness, and guessed too quickly that it could also use some generalization. If I bothered to prove it, I'd experience one of the bright sides of verification - proving false things becomes difficult :-).

I'd rather suggest moving the theorem to some article about functions, or changing the comment appropriately and leaving it there until the moving is done.

Best,
Josef


On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, trybulec wrote:

A comment in OSALG_1:

:: REVISE:: WELLFND1:1 should be generalised to Relation and moved to RELAT_1

The problem is that WELLFND1:1

theorem :: WELLFND1:1
for X being set, f, g being Function st f c= g & X c= dom f holds f|X = g|X

is not true for Relations, e.g.

  f = { [1,2] }   g = {[1,2],[1,3]}  X = {1}

So, I have removed the comment.

Regards,
Andrzej