[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [mizar] [gmane.comp.science.types.announce] [Agda] CFP: Dependently Typed Programming (FI Special Issue)
- To: mizar-forum@mizar.uwb.edu.pl
- Subject: Re: [mizar] [gmane.comp.science.types.announce] [Agda] CFP: Dependently Typed Programming (FI Special Issue)
- From: Freek Wiedijk <freek@cs.ru.nl>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:40:45 +0200
Bob:
>The type theories of folks like Martin Lof, de Bruijn,
>and Gerard Huet are even constructive.
FWIW: de Bruijn's system is not a type theory. It's closer
to the logical framework "LF". In such a system you
don't have _any_ foundations (constructive or classical)
from the start. Instead you start by defining your logic
("axiomatically"), and only then start working on your
mathematics. De Bruijn himself compares it to a restaurant,
where you can order different kinds of food. I think.
Henk Barendregt once had a nice analogy, that unfortunately
I don't remember the details. In it type theory was
intuitionism, set theory was Platonism, and de Bruijn-style
logical frameworks were formalism. Or something like that.
Freek