[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [mizar] Isn't "Subset of" the same as "Element of bool"?
Dear Adam,
>I'm not sure whether it is exactly what you want, but I
>would write it as follows:
>
>definition
> let O be set;
> let A be Subset of O;
> mode Subset of A is Element of bool O;
>end;
But then Subset gets two different meanings! I mean, this is
not done with a redefinition! When I write "Subset of O" I
want it to "be" the Subset of O that I always already used.
Because maybe I want to apply theorems about Subset that are
already present.
?
Freek