:: On the Decompositions of Intervals and Simple Closed Curves :: by Adam Grabowski :: :: Received August 7, 2002 :: Copyright (c) 2002 Association of Mizar Users environ vocabularies NUMBERS, ZFMISC_1, TOPREAL2, PRE_TOPC, EUCLID, XBOOLE_0, SUBSET_1, TARSKI, STRUCT_0, FUNCT_1, RELAT_1, FUNCT_4, PARTFUN1, TOPREAL1, XREAL_0, ORDINAL1, XXREAL_0, ARYTM_3, CARD_1, ARYTM_1, BORSUK_1, XXREAL_1, TOPMETR, CONNSP_1, INTEGRA1, REAL_1, RELAT_2, RCOMP_1, XXREAL_2, ORDINAL2, SEQ_4, T_0TOPSP, TOPS_2, RLTOPSP1, TREAL_1, VALUED_1, MEMBERED, JORDAN2C, BORSUK_4; notations TARSKI, XBOOLE_0, SUBSET_1, ORDINAL1, NUMBERS, XCMPLX_0, XREAL_0, REAL_1, RELAT_1, FUNCT_1, RELSET_1, PARTFUN1, FUNCT_2, REALSET1, MEMBERED, DOMAIN_1, RCOMP_1, FUNCT_4, XXREAL_0, STRUCT_0, PRE_TOPC, COMPTS_1, RLTOPSP1, EUCLID, TOPREAL1, TOPREAL2, SEQ_4, TREAL_1, CONNSP_1, BORSUK_1, BORSUK_3, TSEP_1, TOPMETR, MEASURE6, INTEGRA1, TOPS_2, JORDAN2C; constructors FUNCT_4, CONNSP_1, TOPS_2, COMPTS_1, REALSET2, TSEP_1, TOPREAL1, TOPREAL2, TREAL_1, JORDAN1, MEASURE6, JORDAN2C, BORSUK_3, INTEGRA1, XXREAL_2, SEQ_4, CONVEX1, BINOP_2, RVSUM_1; registrations XBOOLE_0, RELSET_1, FUNCT_2, XXREAL_0, XREAL_0, MEMBERED, RCOMP_1, REALSET1, STRUCT_0, PRE_TOPC, TOPS_1, COMPTS_1, BORSUK_1, TEX_2, EUCLID, TOPREAL1, TOPREAL2, BORSUK_2, REVROT_1, TOPREAL6, INTEGRA1, XXREAL_2; requirements NUMERALS, REAL, SUBSET, BOOLE, ARITHM; definitions XBOOLE_0, TARSKI, CONNSP_1, PARTFUN1, JORDAN1, SUBSET_1, STRUCT_0, RELAT_1; theorems TOPS_2, T_0TOPSP, BORSUK_1, PRE_TOPC, COMPTS_1, TARSKI, TOPMETR, TOPREAL1, RCOMP_1, CONNSP_1, ZFMISC_1, JORDAN5A, XREAL_0, STRUCT_0, TOPREAL6, MEASURE6, TREAL_1, XBOOLE_0, XBOOLE_1, JORDAN6, SEQ_4, INTEGRA1, INTEGRA2, TSEP_1, TOPREAL2, JORDAN5B, FUNCT_2, FUNCT_1, GOBOARD9, RELAT_1, PARTFUN1, RFUNCT_2, BORSUK_3, FUNCT_4, JGRAPH_2, TOPMETR2, TEX_2, REALSET1, XREAL_1, FRECHET, ENUMSET1, JORDAN2C, XXREAL_0, XXREAL_1, XXREAL_2; begin :: Preliminaries registration cluster -> non trivial Simple_closed_curve; coherence proof let D be Simple_closed_curve; ex p1,p2 being Point of TOP-REAL 2 st p1 <> p2 & p1 in D & p2 in D by TOPREAL2:5; hence thesis by REALSET1:14; end; end; theorem Th1: for X being non empty set, A, B being non empty Subset of X st A c< B holds ex p being Element of X st p in B & A c= B \ {p} proof let X be non empty set, A, B be non empty Subset of X; assume A1: A c< B; then B \ A <> {} by XBOOLE_1:105; then consider p being set such that A2: p in B \ A by XBOOLE_0:def 1; A3: not p in A by A2,XBOOLE_0:def 5; reconsider p as Element of X by A2; take p; A c= B by A1,XBOOLE_0:def 8; hence thesis by A2,A3,XBOOLE_0:def 5,ZFMISC_1:40; end; theorem Th2: for X being non empty set, A being non empty Subset of X holds A is trivial implies ex x being Element of X st A = {x} proof let X be non empty set, A be non empty Subset of X; assume A is trivial; then ex s being Element of A st A = {s} by TEX_2:def 1; hence thesis; end; registration let T be non trivial 1-sorted; cluster non trivial Subset of T; existence proof consider x, y being Element of T such that A1: x <> y by STRUCT_0:def 10; take X = {x, y}; A2: y in X by TARSKI:def 2; x in X by TARSKI:def 2; hence thesis by A1,A2,REALSET1:15; end; end; theorem Th3: for X being non trivial set, p being set ex q being Element of X st q <> p proof let X be non trivial set, p be set; X \ { p } is non empty by REALSET1:4; then consider q being set such that A1: q in X \ { p } by XBOOLE_0:def 1; reconsider q as Element of X by A1; take q; thus thesis by A1,ZFMISC_1:64; end; registration let X be non trivial set; cluster non trivial Subset of X; existence proof take [#]X; thus thesis; end; end; theorem Th4: for T being non trivial set, X being non trivial Subset of T, p being set ex q being Element of T st q in X & q <> p proof let T be non trivial set, X be non trivial Subset of T, p be set; set p9 = p; X \ { p9 } is non empty by REALSET1:4; then consider q being set such that A1: q in X \ { p9 } by XBOOLE_0:def 1; reconsider q as Element of T by A1; take q; thus thesis by A1,ZFMISC_1:64; end; theorem Th5: for f, g being Function, a being set st f is one-to-one & g is one-to-one & dom f /\ dom g = { a } & rng f /\ rng g = { f.a } holds f +* g is one-to-one proof let f, g be Function, a be set; assume that A1: f is one-to-one and A2: g is one-to-one and A3: dom f /\ dom g = { a } and A4: rng f /\ rng g = { f.a }; for x1,x2 being set st x1 in dom g & x2 in dom f \ dom g holds g.x1 <> f .x2 proof { a } c= dom g by A3,XBOOLE_1:17; then A5: a in dom g by ZFMISC_1:37; { a } c= dom f by A3,XBOOLE_1:17; then A6: a in dom f by ZFMISC_1:37; let x1,x2 be set; assume that A7: x1 in dom g and A8: x2 in dom f \ dom g; A9: f.x2 in rng f by A8,FUNCT_1:12; assume A10: g.x1 = f.x2; g.x1 in rng g by A7,FUNCT_1:12; then f.x2 in rng f /\ rng g by A9,A10,XBOOLE_0:def 4; then f.x2 = f.a by A4,TARSKI:def 1; then x2 = a by A1,A8,A6,FUNCT_1:def 8; then dom g meets (dom f \ dom g) by A8,A5,XBOOLE_0:3; hence thesis by XBOOLE_1:79; end; hence thesis by A1,A2,TOPMETR2:2; end; theorem Th6: for f, g being Function, a being set st f is one-to-one & g is one-to-one & dom f /\ dom g = { a } & rng f /\ rng g = { f.a } & f.a = g.a holds (f +* g)" = f" +* g" proof let f, g be Function, a be set; assume that A1: f is one-to-one and A2: g is one-to-one and A3: dom f /\ dom g = { a } and A4: rng f /\ rng g = { f.a } and A5: f.a = g.a; A6: dom (g") = rng g by A2,FUNCT_1:55; A7: dom (f") = rng f by A1,FUNCT_1:55; for x being set st x in dom (f") /\ dom (g") holds f".x = g".x proof let x be set; { a } c= dom f by A3,XBOOLE_1:17; then A8: a in dom f by ZFMISC_1:37; assume A9: x in dom (f") /\ dom (g"); then x = f.a by A4,A7,A6,TARSKI:def 1; then A10: a = f".x by A1,A8,FUNCT_1:54; { a } c= dom g by A3,XBOOLE_1:17; then A11: a in dom g by ZFMISC_1:37; x = g.a by A4,A5,A7,A6,A9,TARSKI:def 1; hence thesis by A2,A11,A10,FUNCT_1:54; end; then A12: f" tolerates g" by PARTFUN1:def 6; set gf = f" +* g", F = f +* g; for x being set st x in dom f /\ dom g holds f.x = g.x proof let x be set; assume x in dom f /\ dom g; then x = a by A3,TARSKI:def 1; hence thesis by A5; end; then A13: f tolerates g by PARTFUN1:def 6; dom gf = (dom (f")) \/ (dom (g")) by FUNCT_4:def 1 .= (rng f) \/ (dom (g")) by A1,FUNCT_1:55 .= (rng f) \/ (rng g) by A2,FUNCT_1:55; then A14: dom gf = rng F by A13,FRECHET:39; A15: dom F = (dom f) \/ (dom g) by FUNCT_4:def 1; then A16: dom f c= dom F by XBOOLE_1:7; A17: dom g c= dom F by A15,XBOOLE_1:7; A18: rng F = (rng f) \/ (rng g) by A13,FRECHET:39; A19: for y,x being set holds y in rng F & x = gf.y iff x in dom F & y = F.x proof let y,x be set; hereby assume that A20: y in rng F and A21: x = gf.y; per cases by A14,A20,FUNCT_4:13; suppose A22: y in dom (f"); then A23: y in rng f by A1,FUNCT_1:55; A24: x = f".y by A12,A21,A22,FUNCT_4:16; then A25: y = f.x by A1,A23,FUNCT_1:54; x in dom f by A1,A23,A24,FUNCT_1:54; hence x in dom F & y = F.x by A13,A16,A25,FUNCT_4:16; end; suppose A26: y in dom (g"); then A27: x = g".y by A21,FUNCT_4:14; A28: y in rng g by A2,A26,FUNCT_1:55; then A29: y = g.x by A2,A27,FUNCT_1:54; x in dom g by A2,A28,A27,FUNCT_1:54; hence x in dom F & y = F.x by A17,A29,FUNCT_4:14; end; end; assume that A30: x in dom F and A31: y = F.x; per cases by A30,FUNCT_4:13; suppose A32: x in dom f; then A33: y = f.x by A13,A31,FUNCT_4:16; then A34: x = f".y by A1,A32,FUNCT_1:54; rng F = (rng f) \/ (rng g) by A13,FRECHET:39; then A35: rng f c= rng F by XBOOLE_1:7; A36: y in rng f by A32,A33,FUNCT_1:12; then y in dom (f") by A1,FUNCT_1:55; hence thesis by A12,A34,A36,A35,FUNCT_4:16; end; suppose A37: x in dom g; then A38: y = g.x by A31,FUNCT_4:14; then A39: x = g".y by A2,A37,FUNCT_1:54; A40: rng g c= rng F by A18,XBOOLE_1:7; A41: y in rng g by A37,A38,FUNCT_1:12; then y in dom (g") by A2,FUNCT_1:55; hence thesis by A39,A41,A40,FUNCT_4:14; end; end; F is one-to-one by A1,A2,A3,A4,Th5; hence thesis by A14,A19,FUNCT_1:54; end; theorem Th7: for n being Element of NAT, A being Subset of TOP-REAL n, p, q being Point of TOP-REAL n st A is_an_arc_of p, q holds A \ {p} is non empty proof let n be Element of NAT, A be Subset of TOP-REAL n, p, q be Point of TOP-REAL n; assume A is_an_arc_of p, q; then A1: A \ { p, q } <> {} by JORDAN6:56; { p } c= { p, q } by ZFMISC_1:12; hence thesis by A1,XBOOLE_1:3,34; end; canceled; theorem for s1, s3, s4, l being real number st s1 <= s3 & s1 < s4 & 0 <= l & l <= 1 holds s1 <= (1-l) * s3+l*s4 proof let s1, s3, s4, l be real number; assume that A1: s1 <= s3 and A2: s1 < s4 and A3: 0 <= l and A4: l <= 1; now per cases; suppose l=0; hence thesis by A1; end; suppose l=1; hence thesis by A2; end; suppose A5: not(l=0 or l=1); then l<1 by A4,XXREAL_0:1; then 1-l>0 by XREAL_1:52; then A6: (1-l)*s1<=(1-l)*s3 by A1,XREAL_1:66; A7: (1-l)*s1+l*s1=1 * s1; l*s1 b holds Cl ].a,b.] = [.a,b.] proof let a, b be real number; A1: Cl ].a,b.] c= [.a,b.] by MEASURE6:93,XXREAL_1:23; A2: Cl ].a,b.[ c= Cl ].a,b.] by MEASURE6:98,XXREAL_1:21; assume a <> b; then [.a,b.] c= Cl ].a,b.] by A2,TOPREAL6:82; hence thesis by A1,XBOOLE_0:def 10; end; theorem Th21: for a, b being real number st a <> b holds Cl [.a,b.[ = [.a,b.] proof let a, b be real number; A1: Cl [.a,b.[ c= [.a,b.] by MEASURE6:93,XXREAL_1:24; A2: Cl ].a,b.[ c= Cl [.a,b.[ by MEASURE6:98,XXREAL_1:22; assume a <> b; then [.a,b.] c= Cl [.a,b.[ by A2,TOPREAL6:82; hence thesis by A1,XBOOLE_0:def 10; end; theorem for A being Subset of I[01], a, b being real number st a < b & A = ].a ,b.[ holds Cl A = [.a,b.] proof let A be Subset of I[01], a, b be real number; assume that A1: a < b and A2: A = ].a,b.[; reconsider A1 = ].a,b.[ as Subset of R^1 by TOPMETR:24; A3: Cl ].a,b.[ = [.a,b.] by A1,TOPREAL6:82; Cl A = (Cl A1) /\ [#]I[01] by A2,PRE_TOPC:47 .= [.a,b.] /\ [#]I[01] by A3,TOPREAL6:80 .= [.a,b.] by A1,A2,Th17,XBOOLE_1:28; hence thesis; end; theorem Th23: for A being Subset of I[01], a, b being real number st a < b & A = ].a,b.] holds Cl A = [.a,b.] proof let A be Subset of I[01], a, b be real number; assume that A1: a < b and A2: A = ].a,b.]; reconsider A1 = ].a,b.] as Subset of R^1 by TOPMETR:24; A3: Cl ].a,b.] = [.a,b.] by A1,Th20; Cl A = (Cl A1) /\ [#]I[01] by A2,PRE_TOPC:47 .= [.a,b.] /\ [#]I[01] by A3,TOPREAL6:80 .= [.a,b.] by A1,A2,Th18,XBOOLE_1:28; hence thesis; end; theorem Th24: for A being Subset of I[01], a, b being real number st a < b & A = [.a,b.[ holds Cl A = [.a,b.] proof let A be Subset of I[01], a, b be real number; assume that A1: a < b and A2: A = [.a,b.[; reconsider A1 = [.a,b.[ as Subset of R^1 by TOPMETR:24; A3: Cl [.a,b.[ = [.a,b.] by A1,Th21; Cl A = (Cl A1) /\ [#]I[01] by A2,PRE_TOPC:47 .= [.a,b.] /\ [#]I[01] by A3,TOPREAL6:80 .= [.a,b.] by A1,A2,Th19,XBOOLE_1:28; hence thesis; end; canceled 7; theorem Th32: for A being Subset of I[01], a, b being real number st a <= b & A = [.a,b.] holds 0 <= a & b <= 1 proof let A be Subset of I[01], a, b be real number; assume that A1: a <= b and A2: A = [.a,b.]; A3: b in A by A1,A2,XXREAL_1:1; a in A by A1,A2,XXREAL_1:1; hence thesis by A3,BORSUK_1:86; end; theorem Th33: for A, B being Subset of I[01], a, b, c being real number st a < b & b < c & A = [.a,b.[ & B = ].b,c.] holds A, B are_separated proof let A, B be Subset of I[01], a, b, c be real number; assume that A1: a < b and A2: b < c and A3: A = [.a,b.[ and A4: B = ].b,c.]; Cl A = [.a,b.] by A1,A3,Th24; hence Cl A misses B by A4,XXREAL_1:90; Cl B = [.b,c.] by A2,A4,Th23; hence thesis by A3,XXREAL_1:95; end; canceled 9; theorem for p1, p2 being Point of I[01] holds [. p1, p2 .] is Subset of I[01] by BORSUK_1:83,XXREAL_2:def 12; theorem Th44: for a, b being Point of I[01] holds ]. a, b .[ is Subset of I[01] proof let a, b be Point of I[01]; A1: [. a,b .] is Subset of I[01] by BORSUK_1:83,XXREAL_2:def 12; ]. a,b .[ c= [. a,b .] by XXREAL_1:25; hence thesis by A1,XBOOLE_1:1; end; begin :: Decompositions of Intervals theorem for p being real number holds {p} is closed-interval Subset of REAL proof let p be real number; A1: {p} = [.p,p.] by XXREAL_1:17; p is Real by XREAL_0:def 1; hence thesis by A1,INTEGRA1:def 1; end; theorem Th46: for A being non empty connected Subset of I[01], a, b, c being Point of I[01] st a <= b & b <= c & a in A & c in A holds b in A proof let A be non empty connected Subset of I[01], a, b, c be Point of I[01]; assume that A1: a <= b and A2: b <= c and A3: a in A and A4: c in A; per cases by A1,A2,A3,A4,XXREAL_0:1; suppose a = b or b = c; hence thesis by A3,A4; end; suppose A5: a < b & b < c & a in A & c in A; A6: ].b,1 .] c= [.b,1 .] by XXREAL_1:23; A7: [.0,b.[ c= [.0,b.] by XXREAL_1:24; A8: 0 <= a by BORSUK_1:86; A9: c <= 1 by BORSUK_1:86; then A10: b < 1 by A5,XXREAL_0:2; then A11: b in [. 0,1 .] by A5,A8,XXREAL_1:1; 1 in [.0,1 .] by XXREAL_1:1; then A12: [. b,1 .] c= [.0,1 .] by A11,XXREAL_2:def 12; 0 in [.0,1 .] by XXREAL_1:1; then [.0,b.] c= [. 0,1 .] by A11,XXREAL_2:def 12; then reconsider B = [.0,b.[, C = ].b,1 .] as non empty Subset of I[01] by A5,A8,A9,A7,A6 ,A12,BORSUK_1:83,XBOOLE_1:1,XXREAL_1:2,3; assume not b in A; then A c= [. 0,1 .] \ {b} by BORSUK_1:83,ZFMISC_1:40; then A13: A c= [. 0,b .[ \/ ]. b,1 .] by A5,A8,A10,XXREAL_1:201; now per cases by A5,A8,A10,A13,Th33,CONNSP_1:17; suppose A c= B; hence contradiction by A5,XXREAL_1:3; end; suppose A c= C; hence contradiction by A5,XXREAL_1:2; end; end; hence thesis; end; end; theorem Th47: for A being non empty connected Subset of I[01], a, b being real number st a in A & b in A holds [.a,b.] c= A proof let A be non empty connected Subset of I[01], a, b be real number; assume that A1: a in A and A2: b in A; let x be set; assume x in [.a,b.]; then x in { y where y is Real : a <= y & y <= b } by RCOMP_1:def 1; then consider z being Real such that A3: z = x and A4: a <= z and A5: z <= b; A6: 0 <= z by A1,A4,BORSUK_1:86; b <= 1 by A2,BORSUK_1:86; then z <= 1 by A5,XXREAL_0:2; then reconsider z as Point of I[01] by A6,BORSUK_1:86; z in A by A1,A2,A4,A5,Th46; hence thesis by A3; end; theorem Th48: for a, b being real number, A being Subset of I[01] st A = [.a,b .] holds A is closed proof let a, b be real number, A be Subset of I[01]; assume A1: A = [.a,b.]; per cases; suppose A2: a <= b; then A3: b <= 1 by A1,Th32; 0 <= a by A1,A2,Th32; then A4: Closed-Interval-TSpace(a,b) is closed SubSpace of Closed-Interval-TSpace(0,1) by A2,A3,TREAL_1:6; then reconsider BA = the carrier of Closed-Interval-TSpace(a,b) as Subset of Closed-Interval-TSpace(0,1) by BORSUK_1:35; BA is closed by A4,BORSUK_1:def 14; hence thesis by A1,A2,TOPMETR:25,27; end; suppose a > b; then A = {}I[01] by A1,XXREAL_1:29; hence thesis; end; end; theorem Th49: for p1, p2 being Point of I[01] st p1 <= p2 holds [. p1, p2 .] is non empty compact connected Subset of I[01] proof let p1, p2 be Point of I[01]; A1: p2 <= 1 by BORSUK_1:86; set S = [. p1, p2 .]; reconsider S as Subset of I[01] by BORSUK_1:83,XXREAL_2:def 12; assume A2: p1 <= p2; then A3: Closed-Interval-TSpace(p1,p2) is connected by TREAL_1:23; A4: S is closed by Th48; 0 <= p1 by BORSUK_1:86; then I[01] | S = Closed-Interval-TSpace(p1,p2) by A2,A1,TOPMETR:31; hence thesis by A4,A3,COMPTS_1:17,CONNSP_1:def 3; end; theorem Th50: for X being Subset of I[01], X9 being Subset of REAL st X9 = X holds X9 is bounded_above bounded_below proof let X be Subset of I[01], X9 be Subset of REAL; assume A1: X9 = X; then for r being real number st r in X9 holds r <= 1 by BORSUK_1:86; hence X9 is bounded_above by SEQ_4:def 1; for r being real number st r in X9 holds 0 <= r by A1,BORSUK_1:86; hence thesis by SEQ_4:def 2; end; theorem Th51: for X being Subset of I[01], X9 being Subset of REAL, x being real number st x in X9 & X9 = X holds inf X9 <= x & x <= sup X9 proof let X be Subset of I[01], X9 be Subset of REAL, x be real number; assume that A1: x in X9 and A2: X9 = X; X9 is bounded_above bounded_below by A2,Th50; hence thesis by A1,SEQ_4:def 4,def 5; end; Lm1: I[01] is closed SubSpace of R^1 by TOPMETR:27,TREAL_1:5; theorem Th52: for A being Subset of REAL, B being Subset of I[01] st A = B holds A is closed iff B is closed proof reconsider Z = the carrier of I[01] as Subset of R^1 by BORSUK_1:35; let A be Subset of REAL, B be Subset of I[01]; assume A1: A = B; the carrier of I[01] c= the carrier of R^1 by BORSUK_1:35; then reconsider C = A as Subset of R^1 by A1,XBOOLE_1:1; hereby assume A is closed; then A2: C is closed by TOPREAL6:79; C /\ [#] I[01] = B by A1,XBOOLE_1:28; hence B is closed by A2,PRE_TOPC:43; end; assume A3: B is closed; Z is closed by Lm1,BORSUK_1:def 14; then B is closed iff C is closed by A1,TSEP_1:8; hence thesis by A3,TOPREAL6:79; end; theorem Th53: for C being closed-interval Subset of REAL holds inf C <= sup C proof let C be closed-interval Subset of REAL; consider c being Element of C; A1: c <= sup C by INTEGRA2:1; inf C <= c by INTEGRA2:1; hence thesis by A1,XXREAL_0:2; end; theorem Th54: for C being non empty compact connected Subset of I[01], C9 being Subset of REAL st C = C9 & [. inf C9, sup C9 .] c= C9 holds [. inf C9, sup C9 .] = C9 proof let C be non empty compact connected Subset of I[01], C9 be Subset of REAL; assume that A1: C = C9 and A2: [. inf C9, sup C9 .] c= C9; assume [. inf C9, sup C9 .] <> C9; then not C9 c= [. inf C9, sup C9 .] by A2,XBOOLE_0:def 10; then consider c being set such that A3: c in C9 and A4: not c in [. inf C9, sup C9 .] by TARSKI:def 3; reconsider c as real number by A3; A5: c <= sup C9 by A1,A3,Th51; inf C9 <= c by A1,A3,Th51; hence thesis by A4,A5,XXREAL_1:1; end; theorem Th55: for C being non empty compact connected Subset of I[01] holds C is closed-interval Subset of REAL proof let C be non empty compact connected Subset of I[01]; reconsider C9 = C as Subset of REAL by BORSUK_1:83,XBOOLE_1:1; C9 is bounded_below bounded_above by Th50; then A1: lower_bound C9 <= upper_bound C9 by SEQ_4:24; A2: C9 is closed by Th52; then A3: sup C9 in C9 by Th50,RCOMP_1:30; inf C9 in C9 by A2,Th50,RCOMP_1:31; then [. inf C9, sup C9 .] = C9 by A3,Th47,Th54; hence thesis by A1,INTEGRA1:def 1; end; theorem Th56: for C being non empty compact connected Subset of I[01] ex p1, p2 being Point of I[01] st p1 <= p2 & C = [. p1, p2 .] proof let C be non empty compact connected Subset of I[01]; reconsider C9 = C as closed-interval Subset of REAL by Th55; A1: C9 = [. inf C9, sup C9 .] by INTEGRA1:5; A2: inf C9 <= sup C9 by Th53; then A3: sup C9 in C by A1,XXREAL_1:1; inf C9 in C by A1,A2,XXREAL_1:1; then reconsider p1 = inf C9, p2 = sup C9 as Point of I[01] by A3; take p1, p2; thus p1 <= p2 by Th53; thus thesis by INTEGRA1:5; end; begin :: Decompositions of Simple Closed Curves definition func I(01) -> strict non empty SubSpace of I[01] means :Def1: the carrier of it = ]. 0,1 .[; existence proof reconsider E = ]. 0,1 .[ as non empty Subset of I[01] by BORSUK_1:83 ,XXREAL_1:25,33; take I[01] | E; thus thesis by PRE_TOPC:29; end; uniqueness by TSEP_1:5; end; theorem for A being Subset of I[01] st A = the carrier of I(01) holds I(01) = I[01] | A by PRE_TOPC:29,TSEP_1:5; theorem Th58: the carrier of I(01) = (the carrier of I[01]) \ {0,1} proof A1: [.0,1.] = ].0,1.[ \/ {0,1} by XXREAL_1:128; the carrier of I(01) = ]. 0,1 .[ by Def1; hence thesis by A1,BORSUK_1:83,XBOOLE_1:88,XXREAL_1:86; end; theorem Th59: I(01) is open SubSpace of I[01] by Th58,JORDAN6:41,TSEP_1:def 1; theorem Th60: for r being real number holds r in the carrier of I(01) iff 0 < r & r < 1 proof let r be real number; hereby assume r in the carrier of I(01); then r in ]. 0, 1 .[ by Def1; hence 0 < r & r < 1 by XXREAL_1:4; end; assume that A1: 0 < r and A2: r < 1; r in ]. 0, 1 .[ by A1,A2,XXREAL_1:4; hence thesis by Def1; end; theorem Th61: for a, b being Point of I[01] st a < b & b <> 1 holds ]. a, b .] is non empty Subset of I(01) proof let a, b be Point of I[01]; assume that A1: a < b and A2: b <> 1; b <= 1 by BORSUK_1:86; then A3: b < 1 by A2,XXREAL_0:1; ]. a, b .] c= the carrier of I(01) proof let x be set; assume x in ]. a, b .]; then x in { r where r is Real : a < r & r <= b } by RCOMP_1:def 9; then consider r being Real such that A4: x = r and A5: a < r and A6: r <= b; A7: 0 < r by A5,BORSUK_1:86; r < 1 by A3,A6,XXREAL_0:2; hence thesis by A4,A7,Th60; end; hence thesis by A1,XXREAL_1:2; end; theorem Th62: for a, b being Point of I[01] st a < b & a <> 0 holds [. a, b .[ is non empty Subset of I(01) proof let a, b be Point of I[01]; assume that A1: a < b and A2: a <> 0; A3: b <= 1 by BORSUK_1:86; [. a, b .[ c= the carrier of I(01) proof let x be set; assume x in [. a, b .[; then x in { r where r is Real : a <= r & r < b } by RCOMP_1:def 8; then consider r being Real such that A4: x = r and A5: a <= r and A6: r < b; A7: r < 1 by A3,A6,XXREAL_0:2; 0 < r by A2,A5,BORSUK_1:86; hence thesis by A4,A7,Th60; end; hence thesis by A1,XXREAL_1:3; end; theorem for D being Simple_closed_curve holds (TOP-REAL 2) | R^2-unit_square, (TOP-REAL 2) | D are_homeomorphic proof let D be Simple_closed_curve; ex f being Function of (TOP-REAL 2)|R^2-unit_square, (TOP-REAL 2)|D st f is being_homeomorphism by TOPREAL2:def 1; hence thesis by T_0TOPSP:def 1; end; theorem for n being Element of NAT, D being non empty Subset of TOP-REAL n, p1 , p2 being Point of TOP-REAL n st D is_an_arc_of p1, p2 holds I(01), (TOP-REAL n) | (D \ {p1,p2}) are_homeomorphic proof reconsider K0 = the carrier of I(01) as Subset of I[01] by BORSUK_1:35; let n be Element of NAT, D be non empty Subset of TOP-REAL n, p1, p2 be Point of TOP-REAL n; assume A1: D is_an_arc_of p1, p2; then consider f being Function of I[01], (TOP-REAL n)|D such that A2: f is being_homeomorphism and A3: f.0 = p1 and A4: f.1 = p2 by TOPREAL1:def 2; A5: rng f = [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|D) by A2,TOPS_2:def 5 .= D by PRE_TOPC:29; A6: dom f = the carrier of I[01] by FUNCT_2:def 1; then A7: 0 in dom f by BORSUK_1:86; A8: 1 in dom f by A6,BORSUK_1:86; A9: f is continuous one-to-one by A2,TOPS_2:def 5; then A10: f .: the carrier of I(01) = f .: (the carrier of I[01]) \ f .: {0,1} by Th58,FUNCT_1:123 .= D \ f .: {0,1} by A6,A5,RELAT_1:146 .= D \ {p1,p2} by A3,A4,A7,A8,FUNCT_1:118; A11: D \ {p1,p2} c= D by XBOOLE_1:36; then reconsider D0 = D \ {p1,p2} as Subset of (TOP-REAL n)|D by PRE_TOPC:29; reconsider D1 = D \ {p1,p2} as non empty Subset of TOP-REAL n by A1, JORDAN6:56; A12: (TOP-REAL n)|D1 = ((TOP-REAL n)|D)|D0 by GOBOARD9:4; set g = (f") | D1; A13: D1 = the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|D1 by PRE_TOPC:29; D1 c= the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|D by A11,PRE_TOPC:29; then reconsider ff = g as Function of (TOP-REAL n)|D1, I[01] by A13, FUNCT_2:38; f" is continuous by A2,TOPS_2:def 5; then A14: ff is continuous by A12,TOPMETR:10; set fD = f | the carrier of I(01); A15: I(01) = I[01] | K0 by PRE_TOPC:29,TSEP_1:5; then reconsider fD1 = fD as Function of I[01]|K0, (TOP-REAL n)|D by FUNCT_2:38; A16: dom fD = the carrier of I(01) by A6,BORSUK_1:35,RELAT_1:91; rng f = [#]((TOP-REAL n)|D) by A2,TOPS_2:def 5; then A17: f" = (f qua Function)" by A9,TOPS_2:def 4; A18: rng fD = f .: the carrier of I(01) by RELAT_1:148; then A19: rng fD = the carrier of ((TOP-REAL n)|(D \ {p1,p2})) by A10,PRE_TOPC:29; then reconsider fD as Function of I(01), (TOP-REAL n)|(D \ {p1,p2}) by A16, FUNCT_2:3; A20: dom fD = [#]I(01) by A6,BORSUK_1:35,RELAT_1:91; f is one-to-one by A2,TOPS_2:def 5; then A21: fD is one-to-one by FUNCT_1:84; then fD" = (fD qua Function)" by A19,TOPS_2:def 4; then A22: fD" is continuous by A9,A10,A15,A14,A17,RFUNCT_2:40,TOPMETR:9; fD1 is continuous by A9,TOPMETR:10; then A23: fD is continuous by A15,A12,TOPMETR:9; rng fD = [#]((TOP-REAL n)|(D \ {p1,p2})) by A10,A18,PRE_TOPC:29; then fD is being_homeomorphism by A20,A21,A23,A22,TOPS_2:def 5; hence thesis by T_0TOPSP:def 1; end; theorem Th65: for n being Element of NAT, D being Subset of TOP-REAL n, p1, p2 being Point of TOP-REAL n st D is_an_arc_of p1, p2 holds I[01], (TOP-REAL n) | D are_homeomorphic proof let n be Element of NAT, D be Subset of TOP-REAL n, p1, p2 be Point of TOP-REAL n; assume D is_an_arc_of p1, p2; then ex f being Function of I[01], (TOP-REAL n)|D st f is being_homeomorphism & f.0 = p1 & f.1 = p2 by TOPREAL1:def 2; hence thesis by T_0TOPSP:def 1; end; theorem for n being Element of NAT, p1, p2 being Point of TOP-REAL n st p1 <> p2 holds I[01], (TOP-REAL n) | LSeg (p1, p2) are_homeomorphic by Th65, TOPREAL1:15; theorem Th67: for E being Subset of I(01) st (ex p1, p2 being Point of I[01] st p1 < p2 & E = [. p1,p2 .]) holds I[01], I(01)|E are_homeomorphic proof let E be Subset of I(01); given p1, p2 being Point of I[01] such that A1: p1 < p2 and A2: E = [. p1,p2 .]; A3: p2 <= 1 by BORSUK_1:86; 0 <= p1 by BORSUK_1:86; then reconsider S = Closed-Interval-TSpace(p1,p2) as SubSpace of I[01] by A1,A3,TOPMETR:27 ,TREAL_1:6; reconsider T = I(01)|E as SubSpace of I[01] by TSEP_1:7; the carrier of S = E by A1,A2,TOPMETR:25; then A4: S = T by PRE_TOPC:29,TSEP_1:5; set f = L[01]((#)(p1,p2), (p1,p2)(#)); f is being_homeomorphism by A1,TREAL_1:20; hence thesis by A4,TOPMETR:27,T_0TOPSP:def 1; end; theorem Th68: for n being Element of NAT, A being Subset of TOP-REAL n, p, q being Point of TOP-REAL n, a, b being Point of I[01] st A is_an_arc_of p, q & a < b ex E being non empty Subset of I[01], f being Function of I[01]|E, ( TOP-REAL n)|A st E = [. a, b .] & f is being_homeomorphism & f.a = p & f.b = q proof A1: 0 = (#)(0,1) by TREAL_1:def 1; let n be Element of NAT, A be Subset of TOP-REAL n, p, q be Point of TOP-REAL n, a, b be Point of I[01]; assume that A2: A is_an_arc_of p, q and A3: a < b; reconsider E = [. a, b .] as non empty Subset of I[01] by A3,Th49; A4: b <= 1 by BORSUK_1:86; 0 <= a by BORSUK_1:86; then A5: I[01]|E = Closed-Interval-TSpace(a,b) by A3,A4,TOPMETR:31; then reconsider e = P[01](a,b,(#)(0,1),(0,1)(#)) as Function of I[01]|E, I[01] by TOPMETR:27; take E; A6: a = (#)(a,b) by A3,TREAL_1:def 1; reconsider B = A as non empty Subset of TOP-REAL n by A2,TOPREAL1:4; consider f being Function of I[01], (TOP-REAL n)|B such that A7: f is being_homeomorphism and A8: f.0 = p and A9: f.1 = q by A2,TOPREAL1:def 2; set g = f * e; reconsider g as Function of I[01]|E, (TOP-REAL n)|A; take g; thus E = [. a, b .]; e is being_homeomorphism by A3,A5,TOPMETR:27,TREAL_1:20; hence g is being_homeomorphism by A7,TOPS_2:71; a in E by A3,XXREAL_1:1; then a in the carrier of I[01]|E by PRE_TOPC:29; hence g.a = f.(e.a) by FUNCT_2:21 .= p by A3,A8,A1,A6,TREAL_1:16; A10: 1 = (0,1)(#) by TREAL_1:def 2; A11: b = (a,b)(#) by A3,TREAL_1:def 2; b in E by A3,XXREAL_1:1; then b in the carrier of I[01]|E by PRE_TOPC:29; hence g.b = f.(e.b) by FUNCT_2:21 .= q by A3,A9,A10,A11,TREAL_1:16; end; theorem Th69: for A being TopSpace, B being non empty TopSpace, f being Function of A, B, C being TopSpace, X being Subset of A st f is continuous & C is SubSpace of B holds for h being Function of A|X, C st h = f|X holds h is continuous proof let A be TopSpace, B be non empty TopSpace; let f be Function of A,B; let C be TopSpace, X be Subset of A; assume that A1: f is continuous and A2: C is SubSpace of B; the carrier of A|X = X by PRE_TOPC:29; then reconsider g = f|X as Function of A|X, B by FUNCT_2:38; let h be Function of A|X, C; assume A3: h = f|X; g is continuous by A1,TOPMETR:10; hence thesis by A2,A3,PRE_TOPC:57; end; theorem Th70: for X being Subset of I[01], a, b being Point of I[01] st X = ]. a, b .[ holds X is open proof let X be Subset of I[01], a, b be Point of I[01]; A1: 0 <= a by BORSUK_1:86; 1 in the carrier of I[01] by BORSUK_1:86; then reconsider B = [. b, 1 .] as Subset of I[01] by BORSUK_1:83 ,XXREAL_2:def 12; 0 in the carrier of I[01] by BORSUK_1:86; then reconsider A = [. 0, a .] as Subset of I[01] by BORSUK_1:83 ,XXREAL_2:def 12; A2: b <= 1 by BORSUK_1:86; A3: B is closed by Th48; A4: A is closed by Th48; assume X = ]. a, b .[; then X = (A \/ B)` by A1,A2,BORSUK_1:83,XXREAL_1:200; hence thesis by A4,A3; end; theorem Th71: for X being Subset of I(01), a, b being Point of I[01] st X = ]. a, b .[ holds X is open proof let X be Subset of I(01), a, b be Point of I[01]; assume A1: X = ]. a, b .[; then reconsider X9 = X as Subset of I[01] by Th44; X9 is open by A1,Th70; hence thesis by Th59,TSEP_1:17; end; theorem Th72: for X being Subset of I(01), a being Point of I[01] st X = ]. 0, a .] holds X is closed proof let X be Subset of I(01), a be Point of I[01]; assume A1: X = ]. 0, a .]; per cases; suppose A2: 0 < a; [#] I(01) = ]. 0, 1 .[ by Def1; then A3: [#] I(01) \ X = ]. a, 1 .[ by A1,A2,XXREAL_1:187; 1 in the carrier of I[01] by BORSUK_1:86; then [#] I(01) \ X is open by A3,Th71; hence thesis by PRE_TOPC:def 6; end; suppose 0 >= a; then X = {}I(01) by A1,XXREAL_1:26; hence thesis; end; end; theorem Th73: for X being Subset of I(01), a being Point of I[01] st X = [. a, 1 .[ holds X is closed proof A1: 0 in the carrier of I[01] by BORSUK_1:86; let X be Subset of I(01), a be Point of I[01]; assume A2: X = [. a, 1 .[; per cases; suppose A3: X is non empty; A4: a <= 1 by BORSUK_1:86; a <> 1 by A2,A3,XXREAL_1:18; then A5: a < 1 by A4,XXREAL_0:1; [#] I(01) = ]. 0, 1 .[ by Def1; then [#] I(01) \ X = ]. 0, a .[ by A2,A5,XXREAL_1:195; then [#] I(01) \ X is open by A1,Th71; hence thesis by PRE_TOPC:def 6; end; suppose X is empty; hence thesis; end; end; theorem Th74: for n being Element of NAT, A being Subset of TOP-REAL n, p, q being Point of TOP-REAL n, a, b being Point of I[01] st A is_an_arc_of p, q & a < b & b <> 1 ex E being non empty Subset of I(01), f being Function of I(01)|E, (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p}) st E = ]. a, b .] & f is being_homeomorphism & f.b = q proof let n be Element of NAT, A be Subset of TOP-REAL n, p, q be Point of TOP-REAL n, a, b be Point of I[01]; assume that A1: A is_an_arc_of p, q and A2: a < b and A3: b <> 1; reconsider B = A as non empty Subset of TOP-REAL n by A1,TOPREAL1:4; consider F being non empty Subset of I[01], s being Function of I[01]|F, ( TOP-REAL n)|B such that A4: F = [. a, b .] and A5: s is being_homeomorphism and A6: s.a = p and A7: s.b = q by A1,A2,Th68; A8: dom s = [#] (I[01]|F) by A5,TOPS_2:def 5 .= F by PRE_TOPC:def 10; then A9: a in dom s by A2,A4,XXREAL_1:1; reconsider E = ]. a, b .] as non empty Subset of I(01) by A2,A3,Th61; set X = E; A10: I(01)|X is SubSpace of I[01] by TSEP_1:7; set sX = s|E; A11: s is continuous one-to-one by A5,TOPS_2:def 5; A12: s" is continuous by A5,TOPS_2:def 5; A13: the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|A = A by PRE_TOPC:29; then reconsider Ap = A \ {p} as Subset of (TOP-REAL n)|A by XBOOLE_1:36; the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p}) = A \ {p} by PRE_TOPC:29; then the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p}) c= the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|A by A13,XBOOLE_1:36; then A14: (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p}) is SubSpace of (TOP-REAL n)|A by TSEP_1:4; A15: E c= F by A4,XXREAL_1:23; then reconsider X9 = E as Subset of I[01]|F by PRE_TOPC:29; A16: I[01]|F|X9 is SubSpace of I[01] by TSEP_1:7; the carrier of I(01)|E = E by PRE_TOPC:29; then the carrier of I(01)|X c= the carrier of I[01]|F by A15,PRE_TOPC:29; then A17: I(01)|X is SubSpace of I[01]|F by A10,TSEP_1:4; A18: ((TOP-REAL n)|A)|Ap = (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p}) by PRE_TOPC:28,XBOOLE_1:36; A19: dom sX = X by A4,A8,RELAT_1:91,XXREAL_1:23 .= [#] (I(01)|X) by PRE_TOPC:def 10; A20: rng s = [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|A) by A5,TOPS_2:def 5; then A21: rng s = A by PRE_TOPC:def 10; X = F \ {a} by A2,A4,XXREAL_1:134; then A22: s.:X = s.:F \ Im(s,a) by A11,FUNCT_1:123 .= s.:F \ {s.a} by A9,FUNCT_1:117 .= rng s \ {p} by A6,A8,RELAT_1:146 .= [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p})) by A21,PRE_TOPC:def 10; then A23: [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p})) = rng sX by RELAT_1:148; rng (s|E) = the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p}) by A22,RELAT_1:148; then reconsider sX as Function of I(01)|E, (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p}) by A19, FUNCT_2:3; b in X by A2,XXREAL_1:2; then A24: sX.b = q by A7,FUNCT_1:72; the carrier of I(01)|X = X by PRE_TOPC:29; then I(01)|X = I[01]|F|X9 by A10,A16,PRE_TOPC:29,TSEP_1:5; then A25: sX is continuous by A11,A14,Th69; A26: sX is one-to-one by A11,FUNCT_1:84; then sX" = (sX qua Function)" by A23,TOPS_2:def 4 .= (s qua Function)" | (s.:X) by A11,RFUNCT_2:40 .= s" | [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p})) by A11,A20,A22,TOPS_2:def 4 .= s" | Ap by PRE_TOPC:def 10; then sX" is continuous by A12,A17,A18,Th69; then sX is being_homeomorphism by A23,A19,A25,A26,TOPS_2:def 5; hence thesis by A24; end; theorem Th75: for n being Element of NAT, A being Subset of TOP-REAL n, p, q being Point of TOP-REAL n, a, b being Point of I[01] st A is_an_arc_of p, q & a < b & a <> 0 ex E being non empty Subset of I(01), f being Function of I(01)|E, (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {q}) st E = [. a, b .[ & f is being_homeomorphism & f.a = p proof let n be Element of NAT, A be Subset of TOP-REAL n, p, q be Point of TOP-REAL n, a, b be Point of I[01]; assume that A1: A is_an_arc_of p, q and A2: a < b and A3: a <> 0; reconsider B = A as non empty Subset of TOP-REAL n by A1,TOPREAL1:4; consider F being non empty Subset of I[01], s being Function of I[01]|F, ( TOP-REAL n)|B such that A4: F = [. a, b .] and A5: s is being_homeomorphism and A6: s.a = p and A7: s.b = q by A1,A2,Th68; A8: dom s = [#] (I[01]|F) by A5,TOPS_2:def 5 .= F by PRE_TOPC:def 10; then A9: b in dom s by A2,A4,XXREAL_1:1; reconsider E = [. a, b .[ as non empty Subset of I(01) by A2,A3,Th62; set X = E; A10: I(01)|X is SubSpace of I[01] by TSEP_1:7; set sX = s|E; A11: s is continuous one-to-one by A5,TOPS_2:def 5; A12: s" is continuous by A5,TOPS_2:def 5; A13: the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|A = A by PRE_TOPC:29; then reconsider Ap = A \ {q} as Subset of (TOP-REAL n)|A by XBOOLE_1:36; the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {q}) = A \ {q} by PRE_TOPC:29; then the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {q}) c= the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|A by A13,XBOOLE_1:36; then A14: (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {q}) is SubSpace of (TOP-REAL n)|A by TSEP_1:4; A15: E c= F by A4,XXREAL_1:24; then reconsider X9 = E as Subset of I[01]|F by PRE_TOPC:29; A16: I[01]|F|X9 is SubSpace of I[01] by TSEP_1:7; the carrier of I(01)|E = E by PRE_TOPC:29; then the carrier of I(01)|X c= the carrier of I[01]|F by A15,PRE_TOPC:29; then A17: I(01)|X is SubSpace of I[01]|F by A10,TSEP_1:4; A18: ((TOP-REAL n)|A)|Ap = (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {q}) by PRE_TOPC:28,XBOOLE_1:36; A19: dom sX = X by A4,A8,RELAT_1:91,XXREAL_1:24 .= [#] (I(01)|X) by PRE_TOPC:def 10; A20: rng s = [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|A) by A5,TOPS_2:def 5; then A21: rng s = A by PRE_TOPC:def 10; X = F \ {b} by A2,A4,XXREAL_1:135; then A22: s.:X = s.:F \ Im(s,b) by A11,FUNCT_1:123 .= s.:F \ {s.b} by A9,FUNCT_1:117 .= rng s \ {q} by A7,A8,RELAT_1:146 .= [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {q})) by A21,PRE_TOPC:def 10; then A23: [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {q})) = rng sX by RELAT_1:148; rng (s|E) = the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {q}) by A22,RELAT_1:148; then reconsider sX as Function of I(01)|E, (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {q}) by A19, FUNCT_2:3; a in X by A2,XXREAL_1:3; then A24: sX.a = p by A6,FUNCT_1:72; the carrier of I(01)|X = X by PRE_TOPC:29; then I(01)|X = I[01]|F|X9 by A10,A16,PRE_TOPC:29,TSEP_1:5; then A25: sX is continuous by A11,A14,Th69; A26: sX is one-to-one by A11,FUNCT_1:84; then sX" = (sX qua Function)" by A23,TOPS_2:def 4 .= (s qua Function)" | (s.:X) by A11,RFUNCT_2:40 .= s" | [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {q})) by A11,A20,A22,TOPS_2:def 4 .= s" | Ap by PRE_TOPC:def 10; then sX" is continuous by A12,A17,A18,Th69; then sX is being_homeomorphism by A23,A19,A25,A26,TOPS_2:def 5; hence thesis by A24; end; theorem Th76: for n being Element of NAT, A, B being Subset of TOP-REAL n, p, q being Point of TOP-REAL n st A is_an_arc_of p, q & B is_an_arc_of q, p & A /\ B = { p, q } & p <> q holds I(01), (TOP-REAL n) | ((A \ {p}) \/ (B \ {p})) are_homeomorphic proof reconsider a = 0, b = 1/2, c = 1 as Point of I[01] by BORSUK_1:86; let n be Element of NAT, A, B be Subset of TOP-REAL n, p, q be Point of TOP-REAL n; assume that A1: A is_an_arc_of p, q and A2: B is_an_arc_of q, p and A3: A /\ B = { p, q } and A4: p <> q; consider E2 being non empty Subset of I(01), ty being Function of I(01)|E2, (TOP-REAL n)|(B \ {p}) such that A5: E2 = [. b, c .[ and A6: ty is being_homeomorphism and A7: ty.b = q by A2,Th75; consider E1 being non empty Subset of I(01), sx being Function of I(01)|E1, (TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p}) such that A8: E1 = ]. a, b .] and A9: sx is being_homeomorphism and A10: sx.b = q by A1,Th74; set T1 = I(01)|E1, T2 = I(01)|E2, T = I(01), S = (TOP-REAL n) | ((A \ {p}) \/ (B \ {p})), U1 = (TOP-REAL n) | (A \ {p}), U2 = (TOP-REAL n)|(B \ {p}); A11: A \ {p} is non empty by A1,Th7; then reconsider S as non empty SubSpace of TOP-REAL n; B \ {p} is non empty by A2,Th7,JORDAN5B:14; then reconsider U1, U2 as non empty SubSpace of TOP-REAL n by A11; A12: the carrier of S = (A \ {p}) \/ (B \ {p}) by PRE_TOPC:29; the carrier of U2 = B \ {p} by PRE_TOPC:29; then A13: the carrier of U2 c= the carrier of S by A12,XBOOLE_1:7; then reconsider ty9 = ty as Function of T2, S by FUNCT_2:9; A14: U2 is SubSpace of S by A13,TSEP_1:4; ty is continuous by A6,TOPS_2:def 5; then A15: ty9 is continuous by A14,PRE_TOPC:56; reconsider F1 = [#] T1, F2 = [#] T2 as non empty Subset of T by PRE_TOPC:def 10; A16: F2 = [. 1/2, 1 .[ by A5,PRE_TOPC:def 10; the carrier of U1 = A \ {p} by PRE_TOPC:29; then A17: the carrier of U1 c= the carrier of S by A12,XBOOLE_1:7; then reconsider sx9 = sx as Function of T1, S by FUNCT_2:9; A18: U1 is SubSpace of S by A17,TSEP_1:4; A19: rng ty = [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|(B \ {p})) by A6,TOPS_2:def 5; then A20: rng ty = B \ {p} by PRE_TOPC:def 10; A21: rng sx = [#] ((TOP-REAL n)|(A \ {p})) by A9,TOPS_2:def 5; then A22: rng sx = A \ {p} by PRE_TOPC:def 10; then A23: rng sx9 /\ rng ty9 = ((A \ {p}) /\ B) \ {p} by A20,XBOOLE_1:49 .= ((A /\ B) \ {p}) \ {p} by XBOOLE_1:49 .= (A /\ B) \ ({p} \/ {p}) by XBOOLE_1:41 .= { sx9.b } by A3,A4,A10,ZFMISC_1:23; sx is continuous by A9,TOPS_2:def 5; then A24: sx9 is continuous by A18,PRE_TOPC:56; A25: 1/2 in the carrier of I[01] by BORSUK_1:86; then A26: F2 is closed by A16,Th73; A27: F1 = ]. 0, 1/2 .] by A8,PRE_TOPC:def 10; then A28: ([#] T1) \/ ([#] T2) = ]. 0, 1 .[ by A16,XXREAL_1:172 .= [#] T by Def1; A29: ([#] T1) /\ ([#] T2) = { 1/2 } by A27,A16,XXREAL_1:138; A30: for d be set st d in ([#] T1) /\ ([#] T2) holds sx.d = ty.d proof let d be set; assume d in ([#] T1) /\ ([#] T2); then d = b by A29,TARSKI:def 1; hence thesis by A10,A7; end; F1 is closed by A25,A27,Th72; then consider F being Function of T,S such that A31: F = sx9+*ty and A32: F is continuous by A24,A15,A26,A28,A30,JGRAPH_2:9; A33: [#] U2 = B \ {p} by PRE_TOPC:def 10; then A34: [#] U2 c= (A \ {p}) \/ (B \ {p}) by XBOOLE_1:7; the carrier of T2 c= the carrier of T by BORSUK_1:35; then reconsider g = ty" as Function of U2, T by FUNCT_2:9; the carrier of T1 c= the carrier of T by BORSUK_1:35; then reconsider f = sx" as Function of U1, T by FUNCT_2:9; A35: dom ty9 = [#] T2 by FUNCT_2:def 1; A36: [#] U1 = A \ {p} by PRE_TOPC:def 10; then [#] U1 c= (A \ {p}) \/ (B \ {p}) by XBOOLE_1:7; then reconsider V1 = [#] U1, V2 = [#] U2 as Subset of S by A34,PRE_TOPC:29; A37: dom F = [#] I(01) by FUNCT_2:def 1; A38: V2 is closed proof reconsider B9 = B as Subset of TOP-REAL n; A39: B9 is closed by A2,COMPTS_1:16,JORDAN5A:1; A40: not p in {q} by A4,TARSKI:def 1; q in B by A2,TOPREAL1:4; then A41: {q} c= B by ZFMISC_1:37; A42: B /\ (A \ {p}) = B /\ A \ {p} by XBOOLE_1:49 .= {q} by A3,A4,ZFMISC_1:23; B9 /\ [#] S = B9 /\ ((A \ {p}) \/ (B \ {p})) by PRE_TOPC:def 10 .= (B /\ (A \ {p})) \/ (B /\ (B \ {p})) by XBOOLE_1:23 .= (B /\ (A \ {p})) \/ (B \ {p}) by XBOOLE_1:28,36 .= B \ {p} by A40,A41,A42,XBOOLE_1:12,ZFMISC_1:40 .= V2 by PRE_TOPC:def 10; hence thesis by A39,PRE_TOPC:43; end; A43: V1 is closed proof reconsider A9 = A as Subset of TOP-REAL n; A44: A9 is closed by A1,COMPTS_1:16,JORDAN5A:1; A45: not p in {q} by A4,TARSKI:def 1; q in A by A1,TOPREAL1:4; then A46: {q} c= A by ZFMISC_1:37; A47: A /\ (B \ {p}) = A /\ B \ {p} by XBOOLE_1:49 .= {q} by A3,A4,ZFMISC_1:23; A9 /\ [#] S = A9 /\ ((A \ {p}) \/ (B \ {p})) by PRE_TOPC:def 10 .= (A /\ (A \ {p})) \/ (A /\ (B \ {p})) by XBOOLE_1:23 .= (A \ {p}) \/ (A /\ (B \ {p})) by XBOOLE_1:28,36 .= A \ {p} by A45,A46,A47,XBOOLE_1:12,ZFMISC_1:40 .= V1 by PRE_TOPC:def 10; hence thesis by A44,PRE_TOPC:43; end; ty" is continuous by A6,TOPS_2:def 5; then A48: g is continuous by PRE_TOPC:56; sx" is continuous by A9,TOPS_2:def 5; then A49: f is continuous by PRE_TOPC:56; A50: ty9 is one-to-one by A6,TOPS_2:def 5; then A51: ty" = (ty qua Function)" by A19,TOPS_2:def 4; A52: dom sx9 = [#] T1 by FUNCT_2:def 1; then A53: dom sx9 /\ dom ty9 = { b } by A27,A16,A35,XXREAL_1:138; sx9 tolerates ty9 proof let t be set; assume t in dom sx9 /\ dom ty9; then t = b by A53,TARSKI:def 1; hence thesis by A10,A7; end; then A54: rng F = rng sx9 \/ rng ty9 by A31,FRECHET:39 .= [#] S by A22,A20,PRE_TOPC:def 10; A55: sx9 is one-to-one by A9,TOPS_2:def 5; then A56: sx" = (sx qua Function)" by A21,TOPS_2:def 4; A57: for r being set st r in ([#] U1) /\ ([#] U2) holds f.r = g.r proof let r be set; b in E2 by A5,XXREAL_1:3; then A58: b in dom ty by A35,PRE_TOPC:def 10; b in E1 by A8,XXREAL_1:2; then b in dom sx by A52,PRE_TOPC:def 10; then A59: f.q = b by A10,A55,A56,FUNCT_1:56; assume r in ([#] U1) /\ ([#] U2); then r = q by A10,A21,A19,A23,TARSKI:def 1; hence thesis by A7,A50,A51,A58,A59,FUNCT_1:56; end; ([#] U1) \/ ([#] U2) = [#] S by A36,A33,PRE_TOPC:def 10; then A60: ex h being Function of S,T st h = f+*g & h is continuous by A18,A14,A43 ,A38,A49,A48,A57,JGRAPH_2:9; A61: F is one-to-one by A31,A55,A50,A53,A23,Th5; then F" = (F qua Function)" by A54,TOPS_2:def 4; then F" = sx" +* ty" by A10,A7,A31,A55,A50,A53,A23,A56,A51,Th6; then F is being_homeomorphism by A32,A37,A61,A54,A60,TOPS_2:def 5; hence thesis by T_0TOPSP:def 1; end; theorem Th77: for D being Simple_closed_curve, p being Point of TOP-REAL 2 st p in D holds (TOP-REAL 2) | (D \ {p}), I(01) are_homeomorphic proof let D be Simple_closed_curve, p be Point of TOP-REAL 2; consider q being Point of TOP-REAL 2 such that A1: q in D and A2: p <> q by Th4; not q in {p} by A2,TARSKI:def 1; then reconsider R2p = D \ {p} as non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2 by A1, XBOOLE_0:def 5; assume p in D; then consider P1, P2 being non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2 such that A3: P1 is_an_arc_of p,q and A4: P2 is_an_arc_of p,q and A5: D = P1 \/ P2 and A6: P1 /\ P2 = {p,q} by A1,A2,TOPREAL2:5; A7: P2 is_an_arc_of q, p by A4,JORDAN5B:14; D \ {p} = (P1 \ {p}) \/ (P2 \ {p}) by A5,XBOOLE_1:42; then (TOP-REAL 2) | R2p, I(01) are_homeomorphic by A2,A3,A6,A7,Th76; hence thesis; end; theorem for D being Simple_closed_curve, p, q being Point of TOP-REAL 2 st p in D & q in D holds (TOP-REAL 2) | (D \ {p}), (TOP-REAL 2) | (D \ {q}) are_homeomorphic proof let D be Simple_closed_curve, p, q be Point of TOP-REAL 2; assume that A1: p in D and A2: q in D; per cases; suppose p = q; hence thesis; end; suppose p <> q; then reconsider Dp = D \ {p}, Dq = D \ {q} as non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2 by A1,A2, ZFMISC_1:64; A3: (TOP-REAL 2) | Dq, I(01) are_homeomorphic by A2,Th77; (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp, I(01) are_homeomorphic by A1,Th77; hence thesis by A3,BORSUK_3:3; end; end; theorem Th79: for n being Element of NAT, C being non empty Subset of TOP-REAL n, E being Subset of I(01) st (ex p1, p2 being Point of I[01] st p1 < p2 & E = [. p1,p2 .]) & I(01)|E, (TOP-REAL n)|C are_homeomorphic holds ex s1, s2 being Point of TOP-REAL n st C is_an_arc_of s1,s2 proof let n be Element of NAT, C be non empty Subset of TOP-REAL n, E be Subset of I(01); given p1, p2 being Point of I[01] such that A1: p1 < p2 and A2: E = [. p1,p2 .]; A3: I[01], I(01)|E are_homeomorphic by A1,A2,Th67; assume A4: I(01)|E, (TOP-REAL n)|C are_homeomorphic; E is non empty by A1,A2,Th49; then I[01], (TOP-REAL n)|C are_homeomorphic by A4,A3,BORSUK_3:3; then consider g being Function of I[01], (TOP-REAL n)|C such that A5: g is being_homeomorphism by T_0TOPSP:def 1; set s1 = g.0, s2 = g.1; 0 in the carrier of I[01] by BORSUK_1:86; then A6: g.0 in the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|C by FUNCT_2:7; 1 in the carrier of I[01] by BORSUK_1:86; then A7: g.1 in the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|C by FUNCT_2:7; the carrier of (TOP-REAL n)|C c= the carrier of TOP-REAL n by BORSUK_1:35; then reconsider s1, s2 as Point of TOP-REAL n by A6,A7; C is_an_arc_of s1, s2 by A5,TOPREAL1:def 2; hence thesis; end; theorem Th80: for Dp being non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2, f being Function of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp, I(01), C being non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2 st f is being_homeomorphism & C c= Dp & (ex p1, p2 being Point of I[01] st p1 < p2 & f .:C = [. p1,p2 .]) holds ex s1, s2 being Point of TOP-REAL 2 st C is_an_arc_of s1,s2 proof let Dp be non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2, f be Function of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp , I(01), C be non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2; assume that A1: f is being_homeomorphism and A2: C c= Dp; reconsider C9 = C as Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by A2,PRE_TOPC:29; A3: the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2)|Dp = Dp by PRE_TOPC:29; dom f = the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by FUNCT_2:def 1; then C c= dom f by A2,PRE_TOPC:29; then A4: C c= f"(f.:C) by FUNCT_1:146; given p1, p2 being Point of I[01] such that A5: p1 < p2 and A6: f.:C = [. p1,p2 .]; reconsider E = [. p1,p2 .] as Subset of I(01) by A6; A7: rng f = [#] I(01) by A1,TOPS_2:def 5; A8: f is continuous one-to-one by A1,TOPS_2:def 5; then f"(f.:C) c= C by FUNCT_1:152; then f"(f.:C) = C by A4,XBOOLE_0:def 10; then A9: f".:E = C by A6,A8,A7,TOPS_2:68; the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2)|C = C by PRE_TOPC:29; then A10: (TOP-REAL 2)|C is SubSpace of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by A2,A3,TOPMETR:4; set g = f"| E; the carrier of (I(01)|E) = E by PRE_TOPC:29; then A11: g is Function of the carrier of I(01)|E, the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2)|Dp by FUNCT_2:38; A12: rng g = f".:E by RELAT_1:148 .= [#] ((TOP-REAL 2)|C) by A9,PRE_TOPC:29; then reconsider g as Function of I(01)|E, (TOP-REAL 2)|C by A11,FUNCT_2:8; f" is being_homeomorphism by A1,TOPS_2:70; then A13: f" is one-to-one by TOPS_2:def 5; then A14: g is one-to-one by FUNCT_1:84; then A15: g" = (g qua Function)" by A12,TOPS_2:def 4 .= ((f" qua Function)")|((f").:E) by A13,RFUNCT_2:40 .= ((f qua Function)"")|((f").:E) by A8,A7,TOPS_2:def 4 .= f|C by A8,A9,FUNCT_1:65; then reconsider t = f|C as Function of (TOP-REAL 2) | C, I(01)|E; dom (f") = the carrier of I(01) by FUNCT_2:def 1; then dom g = E by RELAT_1:91 .= the carrier of (I(01)|E) by PRE_TOPC:29; then A16: dom g = [#] (I(01)|E); f" is continuous by A1,TOPS_2:def 5; then A17: g is continuous by A10,Th69; ((TOP-REAL 2) | Dp)|C9 = (TOP-REAL 2) | C by A2,PRE_TOPC:28; then t is continuous by A8,Th69; then g is being_homeomorphism by A12,A16,A14,A17,A15,TOPS_2:def 5; then I(01)|E, (TOP-REAL 2)|C are_homeomorphic by T_0TOPSP:def 1; hence thesis by A5,Th79; end; theorem for D being Simple_closed_curve, C being non empty compact connected Subset of TOP-REAL 2 st C c= D holds C = D or (ex p1, p2 being Point of TOP-REAL 2 st C is_an_arc_of p1,p2) or ex p being Point of TOP-REAL 2 st C = {p } proof let D be Simple_closed_curve, C be non empty compact connected Subset of TOP-REAL 2; assume A1: C c= D; assume A2: C <> D; per cases; suppose C is trivial; hence thesis by Th2; end; suppose A3: C is non trivial; C c< D by A1,A2,XBOOLE_0:def 8; then consider p being Point of TOP-REAL 2 such that A4: p in D and A5: C c= D \ {p} by Th1; consider d1,d2 being Point of TOP-REAL 2 such that A6: d1 in C and A7: d2 in C and A8: d1 <> d2 by A3,REALSET1:15; reconsider Dp = D \ {p} as non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2 by A6,A5; (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp, I(01) are_homeomorphic by A4,Th77; then consider f being Function of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp, I(01) such that A9: f is being_homeomorphism by T_0TOPSP:def 1; reconsider C9 = C as Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by A5,PRE_TOPC:29; C c= [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | Dp) by A5,PRE_TOPC:29; then A10: C9 is compact by COMPTS_1:11; set fC = f.:C9; A11: C9 is connected by CONNSP_1:24; A12: rng f = [#] I(01) by A9,TOPS_2:def 5; f is continuous by A9,TOPS_2:def 5; then reconsider fC as compact connected Subset of I(01) by A10,A11,A12, COMPTS_1:24,TOPS_2:75; reconsider fC9 = fC as Subset of I[01] by PRE_TOPC:39; A13: fC9 c= [#] I(01); A14: for P being Subset of I(01) st P=fC9 holds P is compact; d1 in D \ {p} by A6,A5; then d1 in the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by PRE_TOPC:29; then A15: d1 in dom f by FUNCT_2:def 1; A16: f is one-to-one by A9,TOPS_2:def 5; d2 in D \ {p} by A7,A5; then d2 in the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by PRE_TOPC:29; then A17: d2 in dom f by FUNCT_2:def 1; A18: f.d2 in f.:C9 by A7,FUNCT_2:43; then reconsider fC9 as non empty compact connected Subset of I[01] by A13,A14,COMPTS_1:11 ,CONNSP_1:24; consider p1, p2 being Point of I[01] such that A19: p1 <= p2 and A20: fC9 = [. p1,p2 .] by Th56; A21: f.d1 in f.:C9 by A6,FUNCT_2:43; p1 <> p2 proof assume p1 = p2; then A22: fC9 = {p1} by A20,XXREAL_1:17; then A23: f.d2 = p1 by A18,TARSKI:def 1; f.d1 = p1 by A21,A22,TARSKI:def 1; hence thesis by A8,A15,A17,A16,A23,FUNCT_1:def 8; end; then p1 < p2 by A19,XXREAL_0:1; hence thesis by A5,A9,A20,Th80; end; end; begin :: Addenda :: from BORSUK_6, 2007.04.08, A,T. definition let T be 1-sorted; attr T is real-membered means :: BORSUK_6:def 1 :Def2: the carrier of T is real-membered; end; registration cluster I[01] -> real-membered; coherence proof thus the carrier of I[01] is real-membered by BORSUK_1:83; end; end; :: from RCOMP_3, 2007.04.08, A,T. registration cluster real-membered 1-sorted; existence proof take I[01]; thus thesis; end; end; registration let S be real-membered 1-sorted; cluster the carrier of S -> real-membered; coherence by Def2; end; theorem Th82: for C being non empty compact Subset of I[01] st C c= ].0,1.[ holds ex D being closed-interval Subset of REAL st C c= D & D c= ].0,1.[ & inf C = inf D & sup C = sup D proof let C be non empty compact Subset of I[01]; assume A1: C c= ].0,1.[; reconsider C9 = C as Subset of REAL by BORSUK_1:83,XBOOLE_1:1; reconsider D = [. inf C9, sup C9 .] as Subset of REAL; A2: C9 is bounded_below bounded_above by Th50; then A3: lower_bound C9 <= upper_bound C9 by SEQ_4:24; A4: C c= D proof let x be set; assume A5: x in C; then x in the carrier of I[01]; then reconsider x9 = x as Real by BORSUK_1:83; A6: x9 <= sup C9 by A5,Th51; inf C9 <= x9 by A5,Th51; hence thesis by A6,XXREAL_1:1; end; A7: C9 is closed by Th52; then A8: inf C9 in C9 by Th50,RCOMP_1:31; A9: sup C9 in C9 by A7,Th50,RCOMP_1:30; then A10: D is non empty compact connected Subset of I[01] by A2,A8,Th49,SEQ_4:24; then A11: D is closed-interval Subset of REAL by Th55; then A12: D = [. inf D, sup D .] by INTEGRA1:5; then A13: sup C9 = sup D by A3,XXREAL_1:66; A14: not 1 in D proof assume 1 in D; then sup D >= 1 by A11,INTEGRA2:1; hence thesis by A1,A9,A13,XXREAL_1:4; end; A15: inf C9 = inf D by A3,A12,XXREAL_1:66; A16: not 0 in D proof assume 0 in D; then inf D <= 0 by A11,INTEGRA2:1; hence thesis by A1,A8,A15,XXREAL_1:4; end; A17: D c= ].0,1.[ proof let x be set; assume x in D; hence thesis by A10,A16,A14,BORSUK_1:83,XXREAL_1:5; end; reconsider D as closed-interval Subset of REAL by A3,INTEGRA1:def 1; take D; thus thesis by A4,A3,A12,A17,XXREAL_1:66; consider x being Element of C9; end; theorem Th83: for C being non empty compact Subset of I[01] st C c= ].0,1.[ holds ex p1, p2 being Point of I[01] st p1 <= p2 & C c= [. p1, p2 .] & [.p1,p2 .] c= ]. 0, 1 .[ proof let C be non empty compact Subset of I[01]; assume C c= ].0,1.[; then consider D being closed-interval Subset of REAL such that A1: C c= D and A2: D c= ].0,1.[ and inf C = inf D and sup C = sup D by Th82; consider p1,p2 being Real such that A3: p1 <= p2 and A4: D = [.p1,p2.] by INTEGRA1:def 1; p1 in D by A3,A4,XXREAL_1:1; then A5: p1 in ].0,1.[ by A2; p2 in D by A3,A4,XXREAL_1:1; then A6: p2 in ].0,1.[ by A2; ].0,1.[ c= [.0,1.] by XXREAL_1:25; then reconsider p1, p2 as Point of I[01] by A5,A6,BORSUK_1:83; take p1, p2; thus p1 <= p2 by A3; thus thesis by A1,A2,A4; end; theorem for D being Simple_closed_curve, C being closed Subset of TOP-REAL 2 st C c< D ex p1,p2 being Point of TOP-REAL 2, B being Subset of TOP-REAL 2 st B is_an_arc_of p1,p2 & C c= B & B c= D proof let D be Simple_closed_curve, C be closed Subset of TOP-REAL 2; assume A1: C c< D; then A2: C c= D by XBOOLE_0:def 8; A3: for C being compact Subset of TOP-REAL 2 st C is non trivial & C c< D ex p1,p2 being Point of TOP-REAL 2, B being Subset of TOP-REAL 2 st B is_an_arc_of p1,p2 & C c= B & B c= D proof let C be compact Subset of TOP-REAL 2; assume C is non trivial; then consider d1,d2 being Point of TOP-REAL 2 such that A4: d1 in C and A5: d2 in C and A6: d1 <> d2 by REALSET1:15; assume C c< D; then consider p being Point of TOP-REAL 2 such that A7: p in D and A8: C c= D \ {p} by A4,Th1; reconsider Dp = D \ {p} as non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2 by A4,A8; (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp, I(01) are_homeomorphic by A7,Th77; then consider f being Function of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp, I(01) such that A9: f is being_homeomorphism by T_0TOPSP:def 1; d2 in D \ {p} by A5,A8; then d2 in the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by PRE_TOPC:29; then A10: d2 in dom f by FUNCT_2:def 1; d1 in D \ {p} by A4,A8; then d1 in the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by PRE_TOPC:29; then A11: d1 in dom f by FUNCT_2:def 1; A12: f is one-to-one by A9,TOPS_2:def 5; C c= the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by A8,PRE_TOPC:29; then A13: C c= dom f by FUNCT_2:def 1; dom f = the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by FUNCT_2:def 1; then A14: dom f c= the carrier of TOP-REAL 2 by BORSUK_1:35; dom f = the carrier of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by FUNCT_2:def 1; then A15: dom f = Dp by PRE_TOPC:29; reconsider C9 = C as Subset of (TOP-REAL 2) | Dp by A8,PRE_TOPC:29; C c= [#] ((TOP-REAL 2) | Dp) by A8,PRE_TOPC:29; then A16: C9 is compact by COMPTS_1:11; set fC = f.:C9; A17: rng f = [#] I(01) by A9,TOPS_2:def 5; f is continuous by A9,TOPS_2:def 5; then reconsider fC as compact Subset of I(01) by A16,A17,COMPTS_1:24; reconsider fC9 = fC as Subset of I[01] by PRE_TOPC:39; A18: fC9 c= [#] I(01); A19: for P being Subset of I(01) st P=fC9 holds P is compact; fC9 c= the carrier of I(01); then A20: fC9 c= ].0,1.[ by Def1; A21: f.d2 in f.:C9 by A5,FUNCT_2:43; then reconsider fC9 as non empty compact Subset of I[01] by A18,A19, COMPTS_1:11; consider p1, p2 being Point of I[01] such that A22: p1 <= p2 and A23: fC9 c= [. p1,p2 .] and A24: [.p1,p2.] c= ].0,1.[ by A20,Th83; reconsider E = [.p1,p2.] as non empty compact connected Subset of I[01] by A22,Th49; A25: f " E c= dom f by RELAT_1:167; A26: f.d1 in f.:C9 by A4,FUNCT_2:43; p1 <> p2 proof assume p1 = p2; then A27: fC9 c= {p1} by A23,XXREAL_1:17; then A28: f.d2 = p1 by A21,TARSKI:def 1; f.d1 = p1 by A26,A27,TARSKI:def 1; hence thesis by A6,A11,A10,A12,A28,FUNCT_1:def 8; end; then A29: p1 < p2 by A22,XXREAL_0:1; E c= rng f by A17,A24,Def1; then reconsider B = f " E as non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2 by A25,A14, RELAT_1:174,XBOOLE_1:1; rng f = ].0,1.[ by A17,Def1; then f.: (f"E) = E by A24,FUNCT_1:147; then consider s1, s2 being Point of TOP-REAL 2 such that A30: B is_an_arc_of s1,s2 by A9,A29,A15,Th80,RELAT_1:167; take s1, s2, B; thus B is_an_arc_of s1,s2 by A30; Dp c= D by XBOOLE_1:36; hence thesis by A23,A25,A15,A13,FUNCT_1:163,XBOOLE_1:1; end; D is Bounded by JORDAN2C:73; then A31: C is compact by A2,JORDAN2C:16,TOPREAL6:88; per cases; suppose A32: C is trivial; per cases; suppose A33: C = {}; consider p,q being Point of TOP-REAL 2 such that A34: p <> q and A35: p in D and A36: q in D by TOPREAL2:4; reconsider CC = {p,q} as Subset of TOP-REAL 2; A37: q in CC by TARSKI:def 2; p in CC by TARSKI:def 2; then A38: CC is non trivial by A34,A37,REALSET1:14; reconsider pp = {p}, qq = {q} as Subset of TOP-REAL 2; CC = pp \/ qq by ENUMSET1:41; then A39: CC is compact by COMPTS_1:19; A40: CC <> D proof assume CC = D; then D \ CC = {} by XBOOLE_1:37; then not {}((TOP-REAL 2)|D) is connected by A34,A35,A36,JORDAN6:60; hence thesis; end; CC c= D by A35,A36,ZFMISC_1:38; then CC c< D by A40,XBOOLE_0:def 8; then consider p1,p2 being Point of TOP-REAL 2, B being Subset of TOP-REAL 2 such that A41: B is_an_arc_of p1,p2 and CC c= B and A42: B c= D by A3,A38,A39; take p1, p2, B; thus B is_an_arc_of p1,p2 by A41; thus C c= B by A33,XBOOLE_1:2; thus thesis by A42; end; suppose C <> {}; then consider x being Element of TOP-REAL 2 such that A43: C = {x} by A32,Th2; consider y being Element of D such that A44: x <> y by Th3; reconsider y9 = y as Element of TOP-REAL 2; reconsider Y = {y9} as compact non empty Subset of TOP-REAL 2; reconsider Cy = C \/ Y as non empty compact Subset of TOP-REAL 2 by A31, COMPTS_1:19; A45: x in C by A43,TARSKI:def 1; A46: Cy <> D proof assume Cy = D; then A47: D \ Cy = {} by XBOOLE_1:37; Cy = {x,y} by A43,ENUMSET1:41; then not {}((TOP-REAL 2)|D) is connected by A2,A45,A44,A47,JORDAN6:60; hence thesis; end; {y} c= D; then Cy c= D by A2,XBOOLE_1:8; then A48: Cy c< D by A46,XBOOLE_0:def 8; A49: C c= Cy by XBOOLE_1:7; y in Y by TARSKI:def 1; then y in Cy by XBOOLE_0:def 3; then Cy is non trivial by A45,A44,A49,REALSET1:14; then consider p1,p2 being Point of TOP-REAL 2, B being Subset of TOP-REAL 2 such that A50: B is_an_arc_of p1,p2 and A51: Cy c= B and A52: B c= D by A3,A48; take p1, p2, B; thus B is_an_arc_of p1,p2 by A50; thus C c= B by A49,A51,XBOOLE_1:1; thus thesis by A52; end; end; suppose C is non trivial; hence thesis by A1,A31,A3; end; end;