let G1, G2 be _Graph; :: thesis: for W1 being Walk of G1

for W2 being Walk of G2 st G1 == G2 & W1 = W2 holds

( ( W1 is closed implies W2 is closed ) & ( W2 is closed implies W1 is closed ) & ( W1 is directed implies W2 is directed ) & ( W2 is directed implies W1 is directed ) & ( W1 is trivial implies W2 is trivial ) & ( W2 is trivial implies W1 is trivial ) & ( W1 is Trail-like implies W2 is Trail-like ) & ( W2 is Trail-like implies W1 is Trail-like ) & ( W1 is Path-like implies W2 is Path-like ) & ( W2 is Path-like implies W1 is Path-like ) & ( W1 is vertex-distinct implies W2 is vertex-distinct ) & ( W2 is vertex-distinct implies W1 is vertex-distinct ) )

let W1 be Walk of G1; :: thesis: for W2 being Walk of G2 st G1 == G2 & W1 = W2 holds

( ( W1 is closed implies W2 is closed ) & ( W2 is closed implies W1 is closed ) & ( W1 is directed implies W2 is directed ) & ( W2 is directed implies W1 is directed ) & ( W1 is trivial implies W2 is trivial ) & ( W2 is trivial implies W1 is trivial ) & ( W1 is Trail-like implies W2 is Trail-like ) & ( W2 is Trail-like implies W1 is Trail-like ) & ( W1 is Path-like implies W2 is Path-like ) & ( W2 is Path-like implies W1 is Path-like ) & ( W1 is vertex-distinct implies W2 is vertex-distinct ) & ( W2 is vertex-distinct implies W1 is vertex-distinct ) )

let W2 be Walk of G2; :: thesis: ( G1 == G2 & W1 = W2 implies ( ( W1 is closed implies W2 is closed ) & ( W2 is closed implies W1 is closed ) & ( W1 is directed implies W2 is directed ) & ( W2 is directed implies W1 is directed ) & ( W1 is trivial implies W2 is trivial ) & ( W2 is trivial implies W1 is trivial ) & ( W1 is Trail-like implies W2 is Trail-like ) & ( W2 is Trail-like implies W1 is Trail-like ) & ( W1 is Path-like implies W2 is Path-like ) & ( W2 is Path-like implies W1 is Path-like ) & ( W1 is vertex-distinct implies W2 is vertex-distinct ) & ( W2 is vertex-distinct implies W1 is vertex-distinct ) ) )

assume that

A1: G1 == G2 and

A2: W1 = W2 ; :: thesis: ( ( W1 is closed implies W2 is closed ) & ( W2 is closed implies W1 is closed ) & ( W1 is directed implies W2 is directed ) & ( W2 is directed implies W1 is directed ) & ( W1 is trivial implies W2 is trivial ) & ( W2 is trivial implies W1 is trivial ) & ( W1 is Trail-like implies W2 is Trail-like ) & ( W2 is Trail-like implies W1 is Trail-like ) & ( W1 is Path-like implies W2 is Path-like ) & ( W2 is Path-like implies W1 is Path-like ) & ( W1 is vertex-distinct implies W2 is vertex-distinct ) & ( W2 is vertex-distinct implies W1 is vertex-distinct ) )

G1 is Subgraph of G2 by A1, GLIB_000:87;

hence ( ( W1 is closed implies W2 is closed ) & ( W2 is closed implies W1 is closed ) & ( W1 is directed implies W2 is directed ) & ( W2 is directed implies W1 is directed ) & ( W1 is trivial implies W2 is trivial ) & ( W2 is trivial implies W1 is trivial ) & ( W1 is Trail-like implies W2 is Trail-like ) & ( W2 is Trail-like implies W1 is Trail-like ) & ( W1 is Path-like implies W2 is Path-like ) & ( W2 is Path-like implies W1 is Path-like ) & ( W1 is vertex-distinct implies W2 is vertex-distinct ) & ( W2 is vertex-distinct implies W1 is vertex-distinct ) ) by A2, Th174; :: thesis: verum

for W2 being Walk of G2 st G1 == G2 & W1 = W2 holds

( ( W1 is closed implies W2 is closed ) & ( W2 is closed implies W1 is closed ) & ( W1 is directed implies W2 is directed ) & ( W2 is directed implies W1 is directed ) & ( W1 is trivial implies W2 is trivial ) & ( W2 is trivial implies W1 is trivial ) & ( W1 is Trail-like implies W2 is Trail-like ) & ( W2 is Trail-like implies W1 is Trail-like ) & ( W1 is Path-like implies W2 is Path-like ) & ( W2 is Path-like implies W1 is Path-like ) & ( W1 is vertex-distinct implies W2 is vertex-distinct ) & ( W2 is vertex-distinct implies W1 is vertex-distinct ) )

let W1 be Walk of G1; :: thesis: for W2 being Walk of G2 st G1 == G2 & W1 = W2 holds

( ( W1 is closed implies W2 is closed ) & ( W2 is closed implies W1 is closed ) & ( W1 is directed implies W2 is directed ) & ( W2 is directed implies W1 is directed ) & ( W1 is trivial implies W2 is trivial ) & ( W2 is trivial implies W1 is trivial ) & ( W1 is Trail-like implies W2 is Trail-like ) & ( W2 is Trail-like implies W1 is Trail-like ) & ( W1 is Path-like implies W2 is Path-like ) & ( W2 is Path-like implies W1 is Path-like ) & ( W1 is vertex-distinct implies W2 is vertex-distinct ) & ( W2 is vertex-distinct implies W1 is vertex-distinct ) )

let W2 be Walk of G2; :: thesis: ( G1 == G2 & W1 = W2 implies ( ( W1 is closed implies W2 is closed ) & ( W2 is closed implies W1 is closed ) & ( W1 is directed implies W2 is directed ) & ( W2 is directed implies W1 is directed ) & ( W1 is trivial implies W2 is trivial ) & ( W2 is trivial implies W1 is trivial ) & ( W1 is Trail-like implies W2 is Trail-like ) & ( W2 is Trail-like implies W1 is Trail-like ) & ( W1 is Path-like implies W2 is Path-like ) & ( W2 is Path-like implies W1 is Path-like ) & ( W1 is vertex-distinct implies W2 is vertex-distinct ) & ( W2 is vertex-distinct implies W1 is vertex-distinct ) ) )

assume that

A1: G1 == G2 and

A2: W1 = W2 ; :: thesis: ( ( W1 is closed implies W2 is closed ) & ( W2 is closed implies W1 is closed ) & ( W1 is directed implies W2 is directed ) & ( W2 is directed implies W1 is directed ) & ( W1 is trivial implies W2 is trivial ) & ( W2 is trivial implies W1 is trivial ) & ( W1 is Trail-like implies W2 is Trail-like ) & ( W2 is Trail-like implies W1 is Trail-like ) & ( W1 is Path-like implies W2 is Path-like ) & ( W2 is Path-like implies W1 is Path-like ) & ( W1 is vertex-distinct implies W2 is vertex-distinct ) & ( W2 is vertex-distinct implies W1 is vertex-distinct ) )

G1 is Subgraph of G2 by A1, GLIB_000:87;

hence ( ( W1 is closed implies W2 is closed ) & ( W2 is closed implies W1 is closed ) & ( W1 is directed implies W2 is directed ) & ( W2 is directed implies W1 is directed ) & ( W1 is trivial implies W2 is trivial ) & ( W2 is trivial implies W1 is trivial ) & ( W1 is Trail-like implies W2 is Trail-like ) & ( W2 is Trail-like implies W1 is Trail-like ) & ( W1 is Path-like implies W2 is Path-like ) & ( W2 is Path-like implies W1 is Path-like ) & ( W1 is vertex-distinct implies W2 is vertex-distinct ) & ( W2 is vertex-distinct implies W1 is vertex-distinct ) ) by A2, Th174; :: thesis: verum